Quantification method for parameters affecting multi-scale roughness-induced fatigue crack closure

Tomoki Mizoguchi, Motomichi Koyama, Hiroshi Noguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Our challenge is to clarify the relationship between crack roughness and microstructure. Roughness-induced crack closure (RICC) is known to be one of the main factors decelerating fatigue crack growth. Two factors trigger RICC: 1) nanometer-scale roughness on the crack surface (nano-roughness) and 2) degree of crack deflection (micro-roughness). These factors affect the friction stress acting on the crack planes and the stress intensity factor range for crack closure. For instance, S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie discussed the effects of geometrical mismatch between fatigue crack planes on crack closure. We further attempt to measure multi-scale crack roughness to quantitatively estimate RICC with respect to both friction and crack closure effects. In this study, we examine the multi-scale crack roughness of a lamellar-structured Fe-9Mn-3Ni-1.4Al-0.01C steel sample as a case study. We verify the effect of crack surface friction. Here, we assume that the basic effect of nano-roughness on friction is significant when the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is less than the angle of nano-roughness. If the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is larger than the angle of nano-roughness, the nano-roughness effect does not occur because the crack surfaces do no contact with each other. To further discuss the underlying effects of multi-scale roughness, we will present more details on the microstructure- and mechanical condition-related roughness parameters and their quantification techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1075
Number of pages5
JournalProcedia Structural Integrity
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018
Event22nd European Conference on Fracture, ECF 2018 - Belgrade, Serbia
Duration: Aug 25 2018Aug 26 2018

Fingerprint

Crack closure
Surface roughness
Cracks
Friction
Fatigue cracks
Microstructure
Steel
Fatigue crack propagation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Quantification method for parameters affecting multi-scale roughness-induced fatigue crack closure. / Mizoguchi, Tomoki; Koyama, Motomichi; Noguchi, Hiroshi.

In: Procedia Structural Integrity, Vol. 13, 01.01.2018, p. 1071-1075.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{6d88465fbe484310903c186747c62ff3,
title = "Quantification method for parameters affecting multi-scale roughness-induced fatigue crack closure",
abstract = "Our challenge is to clarify the relationship between crack roughness and microstructure. Roughness-induced crack closure (RICC) is known to be one of the main factors decelerating fatigue crack growth. Two factors trigger RICC: 1) nanometer-scale roughness on the crack surface (nano-roughness) and 2) degree of crack deflection (micro-roughness). These factors affect the friction stress acting on the crack planes and the stress intensity factor range for crack closure. For instance, S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie discussed the effects of geometrical mismatch between fatigue crack planes on crack closure. We further attempt to measure multi-scale crack roughness to quantitatively estimate RICC with respect to both friction and crack closure effects. In this study, we examine the multi-scale crack roughness of a lamellar-structured Fe-9Mn-3Ni-1.4Al-0.01C steel sample as a case study. We verify the effect of crack surface friction. Here, we assume that the basic effect of nano-roughness on friction is significant when the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is less than the angle of nano-roughness. If the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is larger than the angle of nano-roughness, the nano-roughness effect does not occur because the crack surfaces do no contact with each other. To further discuss the underlying effects of multi-scale roughness, we will present more details on the microstructure- and mechanical condition-related roughness parameters and their quantification techniques.",
author = "Tomoki Mizoguchi and Motomichi Koyama and Hiroshi Noguchi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.225",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1071--1075",
journal = "Procedia Structural Integrity",
issn = "2452-3216",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification method for parameters affecting multi-scale roughness-induced fatigue crack closure

AU - Mizoguchi, Tomoki

AU - Koyama, Motomichi

AU - Noguchi, Hiroshi

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Our challenge is to clarify the relationship between crack roughness and microstructure. Roughness-induced crack closure (RICC) is known to be one of the main factors decelerating fatigue crack growth. Two factors trigger RICC: 1) nanometer-scale roughness on the crack surface (nano-roughness) and 2) degree of crack deflection (micro-roughness). These factors affect the friction stress acting on the crack planes and the stress intensity factor range for crack closure. For instance, S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie discussed the effects of geometrical mismatch between fatigue crack planes on crack closure. We further attempt to measure multi-scale crack roughness to quantitatively estimate RICC with respect to both friction and crack closure effects. In this study, we examine the multi-scale crack roughness of a lamellar-structured Fe-9Mn-3Ni-1.4Al-0.01C steel sample as a case study. We verify the effect of crack surface friction. Here, we assume that the basic effect of nano-roughness on friction is significant when the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is less than the angle of nano-roughness. If the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is larger than the angle of nano-roughness, the nano-roughness effect does not occur because the crack surfaces do no contact with each other. To further discuss the underlying effects of multi-scale roughness, we will present more details on the microstructure- and mechanical condition-related roughness parameters and their quantification techniques.

AB - Our challenge is to clarify the relationship between crack roughness and microstructure. Roughness-induced crack closure (RICC) is known to be one of the main factors decelerating fatigue crack growth. Two factors trigger RICC: 1) nanometer-scale roughness on the crack surface (nano-roughness) and 2) degree of crack deflection (micro-roughness). These factors affect the friction stress acting on the crack planes and the stress intensity factor range for crack closure. For instance, S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie discussed the effects of geometrical mismatch between fatigue crack planes on crack closure. We further attempt to measure multi-scale crack roughness to quantitatively estimate RICC with respect to both friction and crack closure effects. In this study, we examine the multi-scale crack roughness of a lamellar-structured Fe-9Mn-3Ni-1.4Al-0.01C steel sample as a case study. We verify the effect of crack surface friction. Here, we assume that the basic effect of nano-roughness on friction is significant when the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is less than the angle of nano-roughness. If the inclination angle of micro-roughness against the loading direction is larger than the angle of nano-roughness, the nano-roughness effect does not occur because the crack surfaces do no contact with each other. To further discuss the underlying effects of multi-scale roughness, we will present more details on the microstructure- and mechanical condition-related roughness parameters and their quantification techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064661554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064661554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.225

DO - 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.225

M3 - Conference article

VL - 13

SP - 1071

EP - 1075

JO - Procedia Structural Integrity

JF - Procedia Structural Integrity

SN - 2452-3216

ER -