Quantifying lifestyle based social equity implications for national sustainable development policy

Yosuke Shigetomi, Andrew Chapman, Keisuke Nansai, Ken'Ichi Matsumoto, Susumu Tohno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this research is to address the challenge of achieving more equitable social outcomes through a reduction and fairer allocation of environmental burdens, and in doing so, contributing to national sustainable development policy. This novel study demonstrates the nature of societal outcomes through the lens of inequity with respect to lifestyle related environmental footprints and stakeholder preferences. Footprints are derived using input-output analysis, while environmental issue preferences and potential remedial actions are identified using a national survey. To highlight the value of the broadly applicable framework, here we demonstrate a case study of Japan, which is interesting due to shifting demographics engendering an aging, shrinking population. Key findings include that the mitigation of environmental footprints in line with household preferences can positively influence both societal equity outcomes and contribute to closing the gap between rich and poor. Importantly, broad participation, i.e. participation irrespective of income level, is shown to be more effective than participation from a single sector. These findings can assist policymakers to develop policies which are responsive to societal preferences and demographic trends while also furthering the debate toward clarifying norms for acceptable levels of social equity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number084044
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying lifestyle based social equity implications for national sustainable development policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this