TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative explanation of the difference in AC magnetization curves between suspended and immobilized magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical application
AU - Enpuku, Keiji
AU - Yamamura, Shuya
AU - Yoshida, Takashi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant Numbers JP20H05652 and JP21H01343).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12/15
Y1 - 2022/12/15
N2 - We study the difference in AC magnetization (M−H) curves between suspended and immobilized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). We use three commercial MNP samples that are often used for biomedical application. First, we measure the hysteresis area of the AC M−H curve, A, when the amplitude of the excitation field, Hac, is changed. The A vs Hac curve is compared with previously obtained analytical results by taking account of the MNP size distribution in the sample. We show that they quantitatively agree for both suspended and immobilized samples. From the comparison, we clarify the mechanism that determines the AC M−H curve of a suspended sample. For high Hac, the Néel relaxation becomes dominant in the suspended sample, and alignment of easy axes caused by the AC field increases the hysteresis loss compared to the immobilized case. The effect of Brownian relaxation in the suspended sample increases with decreasing Hac and gives additional loss at low field. The portion of Néel-relaxation- and Brownian-relaxation-dominant MNPs in the sample is quantitatively evaluated. We also clarify the difference in harmonic signals between suspended and immobilized samples. Finally, we discuss the condition for the MNP parameters and excitation field that determines the dominant relaxation mechanism in a suspended sample.
AB - We study the difference in AC magnetization (M−H) curves between suspended and immobilized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). We use three commercial MNP samples that are often used for biomedical application. First, we measure the hysteresis area of the AC M−H curve, A, when the amplitude of the excitation field, Hac, is changed. The A vs Hac curve is compared with previously obtained analytical results by taking account of the MNP size distribution in the sample. We show that they quantitatively agree for both suspended and immobilized samples. From the comparison, we clarify the mechanism that determines the AC M−H curve of a suspended sample. For high Hac, the Néel relaxation becomes dominant in the suspended sample, and alignment of easy axes caused by the AC field increases the hysteresis loss compared to the immobilized case. The effect of Brownian relaxation in the suspended sample increases with decreasing Hac and gives additional loss at low field. The portion of Néel-relaxation- and Brownian-relaxation-dominant MNPs in the sample is quantitatively evaluated. We also clarify the difference in harmonic signals between suspended and immobilized samples. Finally, we discuss the condition for the MNP parameters and excitation field that determines the dominant relaxation mechanism in a suspended sample.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140440787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140440787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170089
DO - 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170089
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140440787
VL - 564
JO - Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
JF - Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
SN - 0304-8853
M1 - 170089
ER -