Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Junya Fujita, Shuji Takiguchi, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Yutaka Kimura, Hiroshi Imamura, Shigeyuki Tamura, Chikara Ebisui, Kentaro Kishi, Kazumasa Fujitani, Yukinori Kurokawa, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: LigaSure, a bipolar electronic vessel sealing system, has become popular in abdominal surgery but few clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with curative gastric cancer were randomly assigned to undergo gastrectomy either with LigaSure or a conventional technique. Results: Of the 160 patients enrolled, 80 were randomized to the LigaSure group and 78 to the conventional group. Patient characteristics were well balanced in the two groups. There were no significant differences between the LigaSure and conventional groups in blood loss (288 vs. 260 ml, respectively; P = 0.748) or operative time (223 and 225 min, respectively; P = 0.368); nor in the incidence of surgical complications or duration of postoperative hospital stay. In a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent gastrectomy that preserved the distal part of the greater omentum, the use of LigaSure significantly reduced blood loss (179 vs. 245 ml; P = 0.033), and the duration of the operation (195 vs. 221 min; P = 0.039). Conclusions: LigaSure did not contribute to reducing intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or other adverse surgical outcomes. The usefulness of the device may be limited to a specific part of the surgical procedure in open gastrectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1723-1729
Number of pages7
JournalSurgery today
Volume44
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastrectomy
Stomach Neoplasms
Randomized Controlled Trials
Operative Time
Omentum
Blood Group Antigens
Length of Stay
Equipment and Supplies
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Fujita, J., Takiguchi, S., Nishikawa, K., Kimura, Y., Imamura, H., Tamura, S., ... Doki, Y. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgery today, 44(9), 1723-1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0930-4

Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. / Fujita, Junya; Takiguchi, Shuji; Nishikawa, Kazuhiro; Kimura, Yutaka; Imamura, Hiroshi; Tamura, Shigeyuki; Ebisui, Chikara; Kishi, Kentaro; Fujitani, Kazumasa; Kurokawa, Yukinori; Mori, Masaki; Doki, Yuichiro.

In: Surgery today, Vol. 44, No. 9, 09.2014, p. 1723-1729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fujita, J, Takiguchi, S, Nishikawa, K, Kimura, Y, Imamura, H, Tamura, S, Ebisui, C, Kishi, K, Fujitani, K, Kurokawa, Y, Mori, M & Doki, Y 2014, 'Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer', Surgery today, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1723-1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0930-4
Fujita, Junya ; Takiguchi, Shuji ; Nishikawa, Kazuhiro ; Kimura, Yutaka ; Imamura, Hiroshi ; Tamura, Shigeyuki ; Ebisui, Chikara ; Kishi, Kentaro ; Fujitani, Kazumasa ; Kurokawa, Yukinori ; Mori, Masaki ; Doki, Yuichiro. / Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In: Surgery today. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 9. pp. 1723-1729.
@article{e4fa7e5aa3874b49a64e21655092058e,
title = "Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: LigaSure, a bipolar electronic vessel sealing system, has become popular in abdominal surgery but few clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with curative gastric cancer were randomly assigned to undergo gastrectomy either with LigaSure or a conventional technique. Results: Of the 160 patients enrolled, 80 were randomized to the LigaSure group and 78 to the conventional group. Patient characteristics were well balanced in the two groups. There were no significant differences between the LigaSure and conventional groups in blood loss (288 vs. 260 ml, respectively; P = 0.748) or operative time (223 and 225 min, respectively; P = 0.368); nor in the incidence of surgical complications or duration of postoperative hospital stay. In a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent gastrectomy that preserved the distal part of the greater omentum, the use of LigaSure significantly reduced blood loss (179 vs. 245 ml; P = 0.033), and the duration of the operation (195 vs. 221 min; P = 0.039). Conclusions: LigaSure did not contribute to reducing intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or other adverse surgical outcomes. The usefulness of the device may be limited to a specific part of the surgical procedure in open gastrectomy.",
author = "Junya Fujita and Shuji Takiguchi and Kazuhiro Nishikawa and Yutaka Kimura and Hiroshi Imamura and Shigeyuki Tamura and Chikara Ebisui and Kentaro Kishi and Kazumasa Fujitani and Yukinori Kurokawa and Masaki Mori and Yuichiro Doki",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00595-014-0930-4",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1723--1729",
journal = "Surgery Today",
issn = "0941-1291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer

AU - Fujita, Junya

AU - Takiguchi, Shuji

AU - Nishikawa, Kazuhiro

AU - Kimura, Yutaka

AU - Imamura, Hiroshi

AU - Tamura, Shigeyuki

AU - Ebisui, Chikara

AU - Kishi, Kentaro

AU - Fujitani, Kazumasa

AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori

AU - Mori, Masaki

AU - Doki, Yuichiro

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Purpose: LigaSure, a bipolar electronic vessel sealing system, has become popular in abdominal surgery but few clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with curative gastric cancer were randomly assigned to undergo gastrectomy either with LigaSure or a conventional technique. Results: Of the 160 patients enrolled, 80 were randomized to the LigaSure group and 78 to the conventional group. Patient characteristics were well balanced in the two groups. There were no significant differences between the LigaSure and conventional groups in blood loss (288 vs. 260 ml, respectively; P = 0.748) or operative time (223 and 225 min, respectively; P = 0.368); nor in the incidence of surgical complications or duration of postoperative hospital stay. In a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent gastrectomy that preserved the distal part of the greater omentum, the use of LigaSure significantly reduced blood loss (179 vs. 245 ml; P = 0.033), and the duration of the operation (195 vs. 221 min; P = 0.039). Conclusions: LigaSure did not contribute to reducing intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or other adverse surgical outcomes. The usefulness of the device may be limited to a specific part of the surgical procedure in open gastrectomy.

AB - Purpose: LigaSure, a bipolar electronic vessel sealing system, has become popular in abdominal surgery but few clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with curative gastric cancer were randomly assigned to undergo gastrectomy either with LigaSure or a conventional technique. Results: Of the 160 patients enrolled, 80 were randomized to the LigaSure group and 78 to the conventional group. Patient characteristics were well balanced in the two groups. There were no significant differences between the LigaSure and conventional groups in blood loss (288 vs. 260 ml, respectively; P = 0.748) or operative time (223 and 225 min, respectively; P = 0.368); nor in the incidence of surgical complications or duration of postoperative hospital stay. In a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent gastrectomy that preserved the distal part of the greater omentum, the use of LigaSure significantly reduced blood loss (179 vs. 245 ml; P = 0.033), and the duration of the operation (195 vs. 221 min; P = 0.039). Conclusions: LigaSure did not contribute to reducing intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or other adverse surgical outcomes. The usefulness of the device may be limited to a specific part of the surgical procedure in open gastrectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906790003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906790003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00595-014-0930-4

DO - 10.1007/s00595-014-0930-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 24838660

AN - SCOPUS:84906790003

VL - 44

SP - 1723

EP - 1729

JO - Surgery Today

JF - Surgery Today

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 9

ER -