TY - JOUR
T1 - Ranking and transformation error assessment of shear strength parameters correlations
AU - Daoud, Waled
AU - Kasama, Kiyonobu
AU - Saleh, Naser
AU - Negm, Abdelazim
N1 - Funding Information:
WD carried out the research work, literature review, data collection, analysis of results, and wrote the manuscript. KK studied the collected data and discuss the main findings of the research. AN and NS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Waled A. Daoud is thankful to the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) and Egypt_japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST) for funding his PhD studies. Also, he would like to thank Dr. Hazem Barakat for his technical and financial support during the data collection period and special thanks to Kyushu University for offering the tools and equipment needed for the research. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding Information:
Waled A. Daoud is thankful to the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) and Egypt_japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST) for funding his PhD studies. Also, he would like to thank Dr. Hazem Barakat for his technical and financial support during the data collection period and special thanks to Kyushu University for offering the tools and equipment needed for the research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, The Author(s).
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Shear strength is responsible for soil ability to withstand applied loads and considered the most important engineering properties of soil. Shear strength can be measured directly in the field or in the laboratory, however many empirical correlations were developed to predict shear strength from simple basic and index properties of soil. The main reasons for using these correlations that direct measurements are costly, time consuming, and not always applicable. The correlated shear strength parameter deviates from its actual value, by a transformation error, causing larger uncertainty that affects the overall design. The current commonly used transformation error values have shortcomings that warrant the need for further research. To offer avenues for improving the current values, a database contains geotechnical investigation results for 5087 boreholes collected from Egypt, UAE, Iraq, and Indonesia were created. The database served to assess inherent variability, measurement error, and transformation error more consistently. The most commonly used empirical correlations were ranked based on amended Theil inequality coefficient method, then the transformation error was determined using uncertainty propagation combined with the second moment probabilistic method (RUP-SMP). The adapted methodology can be used as standard procedures to evaluate different empirical correlations for other geotechnical properties. Framework for combining the predicted transformation error with other uncertainties was introduced to determine the overall uncertainty in shear strength parameters.
AB - Shear strength is responsible for soil ability to withstand applied loads and considered the most important engineering properties of soil. Shear strength can be measured directly in the field or in the laboratory, however many empirical correlations were developed to predict shear strength from simple basic and index properties of soil. The main reasons for using these correlations that direct measurements are costly, time consuming, and not always applicable. The correlated shear strength parameter deviates from its actual value, by a transformation error, causing larger uncertainty that affects the overall design. The current commonly used transformation error values have shortcomings that warrant the need for further research. To offer avenues for improving the current values, a database contains geotechnical investigation results for 5087 boreholes collected from Egypt, UAE, Iraq, and Indonesia were created. The database served to assess inherent variability, measurement error, and transformation error more consistently. The most commonly used empirical correlations were ranked based on amended Theil inequality coefficient method, then the transformation error was determined using uncertainty propagation combined with the second moment probabilistic method (RUP-SMP). The adapted methodology can be used as standard procedures to evaluate different empirical correlations for other geotechnical properties. Framework for combining the predicted transformation error with other uncertainties was introduced to determine the overall uncertainty in shear strength parameters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065199991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065199991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40703-016-0028-5
DO - 10.1186/s40703-016-0028-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065199991
SN - 2092-9196
VL - 7
JO - International Journal of Geo-Engineering
JF - International Journal of Geo-Engineering
IS - 1
M1 - 14
ER -