TY - JOUR
T1 - Research Note
T2 - Behavioral preference and conditioned taste aversion to oleic acid solution in chickens
AU - Kawabata, Fuminori
AU - Yoshida, Yuta
AU - Inoue, Yuki
AU - Kawabata, Yuko
AU - Nishimura, Shotaro
AU - Tabata, Shoji
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grants (# 17K08047 and # 18H02330 ) to F. Kawabata and S. Tabata, respectively.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - A functional fatty acid taste receptor, GPR120, is present in chicken oral tissues, and chickens show a preference for lipid in feed. However, it remains unclear whether chickens can detect fatty acids. To address this issue, we adopted 2 behavioral paradigms: a one-bowl drinking test to evaluate the preference for oleic acid solution and a conditioned taste aversion test to investigate the role of gustation in chickens' ability to detect oleic acid. In the one-bowl drinking test, chickens did not show any preference for solution containing 0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, or 30 mmol/L oleic acid although 30 mmol/L oleic acid was enough to fully activate GPR120, confirmed by Ca2+ imaging. On the other hand, chickens conditioned to avoid 30 mmol/L oleic acid solution also learned to avoid the solution. These results suggested that chickens have a gustatory perception of oleic acid solution but do not have a preference for it. The present results support the idea that chickens prefer lipid in feed, not only by a postingestive effect but also by sensing the taste of fatty acid.
AB - A functional fatty acid taste receptor, GPR120, is present in chicken oral tissues, and chickens show a preference for lipid in feed. However, it remains unclear whether chickens can detect fatty acids. To address this issue, we adopted 2 behavioral paradigms: a one-bowl drinking test to evaluate the preference for oleic acid solution and a conditioned taste aversion test to investigate the role of gustation in chickens' ability to detect oleic acid. In the one-bowl drinking test, chickens did not show any preference for solution containing 0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, or 30 mmol/L oleic acid although 30 mmol/L oleic acid was enough to fully activate GPR120, confirmed by Ca2+ imaging. On the other hand, chickens conditioned to avoid 30 mmol/L oleic acid solution also learned to avoid the solution. These results suggested that chickens have a gustatory perception of oleic acid solution but do not have a preference for it. The present results support the idea that chickens prefer lipid in feed, not only by a postingestive effect but also by sensing the taste of fatty acid.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095747868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095747868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 33357702
AN - SCOPUS:85095747868
SN - 0032-5791
VL - 100
SP - 372
EP - 376
JO - Poultry Science
JF - Poultry Science
IS - 1
ER -