Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments

Haruka Sogabe, Yoshitsugu Morita, Ishibashi Shinsuke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to clarify the gap in design evaluation that is thought to exist between groups of people - designers, providers (including managers) and end users - we aimed to create and put into a practical format design evaluation indicators that would make it possible for people from all perspectives to make determinations. We wondered if the same object is being evaluated, whether there are gaps in design evaluations among people who are relatively well versed in creating objects, people such as sellers and marketers who are responsible for providing society with the ultimate fruit and the people who actually use them. Therefore, we created design evaluation indicators so that people with different perspectives can evaluate designs using the same criteria and clarified the gap in design evaluations by collecting data from each group of users through the design indicators. In addition, we think that discussion of the factors that lead to the gap between user groups based on the results of the survey can provide hints at new directions for creation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2007
Event16th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2007 - Paris, France
Duration: Jul 28 2007Jul 31 2007

Publication series

NameProceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design
VolumeDS 42

Other

Other16th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2007
CountryFrance
CityParis
Period7/28/077/31/07

Fingerprint

Fruits
Managers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Sogabe, H., Morita, Y., & Shinsuke, I. (2007). Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments. In Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design (Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design; Vol. DS 42).

Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments. / Sogabe, Haruka; Morita, Yoshitsugu; Shinsuke, Ishibashi.

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. 2007. (Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design; Vol. DS 42).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Sogabe, H, Morita, Y & Shinsuke, I 2007, Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments. in Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, vol. DS 42, 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2007, Paris, France, 7/28/07.
Sogabe H, Morita Y, Shinsuke I. Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments. In Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. 2007. (Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design).
Sogabe, Haruka ; Morita, Yoshitsugu ; Shinsuke, Ishibashi. / Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments. Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. 2007. (Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design).
@inproceedings{29083a5806dc492d9c7d26cd0fac6640,
title = "Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments",
abstract = "In order to clarify the gap in design evaluation that is thought to exist between groups of people - designers, providers (including managers) and end users - we aimed to create and put into a practical format design evaluation indicators that would make it possible for people from all perspectives to make determinations. We wondered if the same object is being evaluated, whether there are gaps in design evaluations among people who are relatively well versed in creating objects, people such as sellers and marketers who are responsible for providing society with the ultimate fruit and the people who actually use them. Therefore, we created design evaluation indicators so that people with different perspectives can evaluate designs using the same criteria and clarified the gap in design evaluations by collecting data from each group of users through the design indicators. In addition, we think that discussion of the factors that lead to the gap between user groups based on the results of the survey can provide hints at new directions for creation.",
author = "Haruka Sogabe and Yoshitsugu Morita and Ishibashi Shinsuke",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "1904670024",
series = "Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design",
booktitle = "Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments

AU - Sogabe, Haruka

AU - Morita, Yoshitsugu

AU - Shinsuke, Ishibashi

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - In order to clarify the gap in design evaluation that is thought to exist between groups of people - designers, providers (including managers) and end users - we aimed to create and put into a practical format design evaluation indicators that would make it possible for people from all perspectives to make determinations. We wondered if the same object is being evaluated, whether there are gaps in design evaluations among people who are relatively well versed in creating objects, people such as sellers and marketers who are responsible for providing society with the ultimate fruit and the people who actually use them. Therefore, we created design evaluation indicators so that people with different perspectives can evaluate designs using the same criteria and clarified the gap in design evaluations by collecting data from each group of users through the design indicators. In addition, we think that discussion of the factors that lead to the gap between user groups based on the results of the survey can provide hints at new directions for creation.

AB - In order to clarify the gap in design evaluation that is thought to exist between groups of people - designers, providers (including managers) and end users - we aimed to create and put into a practical format design evaluation indicators that would make it possible for people from all perspectives to make determinations. We wondered if the same object is being evaluated, whether there are gaps in design evaluations among people who are relatively well versed in creating objects, people such as sellers and marketers who are responsible for providing society with the ultimate fruit and the people who actually use them. Therefore, we created design evaluation indicators so that people with different perspectives can evaluate designs using the same criteria and clarified the gap in design evaluations by collecting data from each group of users through the design indicators. In addition, we think that discussion of the factors that lead to the gap between user groups based on the results of the survey can provide hints at new directions for creation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862604153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862604153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1904670024

SN - 9781904670025

T3 - Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

BT - Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

ER -