TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of endotoxin absorption after a subtotal resection of the small intestine and a right hemicolectomy for severe superior mesenteric ischemia
AU - Tsugawa, Kouji
AU - Koyanagi, Nobuhiro
AU - Hashizume, Makoto
AU - Wada, Hiroya
AU - Ayukawa, Katsuhiko
AU - Akahoshi, Kazuya
AU - Tomikawa, Morimasa
AU - Sugimachi, Keizo
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Background/Aims: The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of endotoxin absorption therapy after a subtotal resection of the small intestine and a right hemicolectomy for severe superior mesenteric ischemia. Methodology: From April 1980 through August 1999, 82 patients with severe superior mesenteric ischemia were operated on an emergency basis, and they were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=51), did not undergo postoperative endotoxin absorption therapy, while group 2 (n=31), underwent this therapy. The two groups were compared based on the outcome variables. Results: When the number of risk factors was 1 or 2, the mortality rate in group 2 was significantly lower than in group 1 (p<0.05). For postoperative lung or liver failure, the mortality rate was signifi- cantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. For an intraabdominal abscess, the mortality rate was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Twenty-two of the thirty-one patients in group 2 survived. In the surviving cases, this therapy significantly decreased the intravenous concentration of endotoxin (p=0.04). As for the fatalities (n=9), no significant change in the concentration of endotoxin before or after endotoxin absorption was recognized. By the first postoperative month, the survival rate was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (58.8% vs. 71.0%, P=0.04). Conclusions: In conclusion, we may now safely say that both stoma and a resection are recommended while endotoxin absorption using blood filtration may also be an effective additional therapy for post-operative septic shock.
AB - Background/Aims: The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of endotoxin absorption therapy after a subtotal resection of the small intestine and a right hemicolectomy for severe superior mesenteric ischemia. Methodology: From April 1980 through August 1999, 82 patients with severe superior mesenteric ischemia were operated on an emergency basis, and they were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=51), did not undergo postoperative endotoxin absorption therapy, while group 2 (n=31), underwent this therapy. The two groups were compared based on the outcome variables. Results: When the number of risk factors was 1 or 2, the mortality rate in group 2 was significantly lower than in group 1 (p<0.05). For postoperative lung or liver failure, the mortality rate was signifi- cantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. For an intraabdominal abscess, the mortality rate was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Twenty-two of the thirty-one patients in group 2 survived. In the surviving cases, this therapy significantly decreased the intravenous concentration of endotoxin (p=0.04). As for the fatalities (n=9), no significant change in the concentration of endotoxin before or after endotoxin absorption was recognized. By the first postoperative month, the survival rate was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (58.8% vs. 71.0%, P=0.04). Conclusions: In conclusion, we may now safely say that both stoma and a resection are recommended while endotoxin absorption using blood filtration may also be an effective additional therapy for post-operative septic shock.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036375173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036375173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 12239931
AN - SCOPUS:0036375173
VL - 49
SP - 1303
EP - 1306
JO - Acta hepato-splenologica
JF - Acta hepato-splenologica
SN - 0172-6390
IS - 47
ER -