TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors associated with increased drainage volumes of chest tubes after transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
AU - Kato, Ryo
AU - Makino, Tomoki
AU - Yamasaki, Makoto
AU - Tanaka, Koji
AU - Miyazaki, Yasuhiro
AU - Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori
AU - Motoori, Masaaki
AU - Kimura, Yutaka
AU - Nakajima, Kiyokazu
AU - Mori, Masaki
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Prolonged chest drain placement can extend the postoperative hospital stay after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer (EC) patients. This study aimed to identify whether or not the risk factors associated with this prolonged chest tube placement are clinically important. Methods: A total of 138 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for thoracic EC were retrospectively analyzed. Using the 75th percentile of the total drainage volume of chest tubes as a cutoff value, the high-output (HO; n = 35) and low-output (LO; n = 103) groups were compared in terms of the clinicopathological parameters. Results: The median durations of right and left chest tube placement were 6 and 9 days, respectively, with a median total drainage volume of 2692 ml. When compared with the LO group, the HO group was significantly associated with male gender, a subcutaneous route for reconstruction, blood transfusion, higher morbidity, and prolonged chest drainage and postoperative hospital stays. A multivariable analysis further identified blood loss (p = 0.03) and the subcutaneous route for reconstruction (p = 0.04) as independent risk factors for increased chest tube drainage after esophagectomy. Conclusion: Blood loss and the subcutaneous route of reconstruction are risk factors for increased drainage of chest tube after esophagectomy for EC.
AB - Purpose: Prolonged chest drain placement can extend the postoperative hospital stay after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer (EC) patients. This study aimed to identify whether or not the risk factors associated with this prolonged chest tube placement are clinically important. Methods: A total of 138 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for thoracic EC were retrospectively analyzed. Using the 75th percentile of the total drainage volume of chest tubes as a cutoff value, the high-output (HO; n = 35) and low-output (LO; n = 103) groups were compared in terms of the clinicopathological parameters. Results: The median durations of right and left chest tube placement were 6 and 9 days, respectively, with a median total drainage volume of 2692 ml. When compared with the LO group, the HO group was significantly associated with male gender, a subcutaneous route for reconstruction, blood transfusion, higher morbidity, and prolonged chest drainage and postoperative hospital stays. A multivariable analysis further identified blood loss (p = 0.03) and the subcutaneous route for reconstruction (p = 0.04) as independent risk factors for increased chest tube drainage after esophagectomy. Conclusion: Blood loss and the subcutaneous route of reconstruction are risk factors for increased drainage of chest tube after esophagectomy for EC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069643977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069643977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00595-019-01849-y
DO - 10.1007/s00595-019-01849-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 31342160
AN - SCOPUS:85069643977
SN - 0941-1291
VL - 49
SP - 1058
EP - 1065
JO - Surgery Today
JF - Surgery Today
IS - 12
ER -