TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors for late cytomegalovirus infection after completing letermovir prophylaxis
AU - Mori, Yasuo
AU - Harada, Takuya
AU - Yoshimoto, Goichi
AU - Shima, Takahiro
AU - Numata, Akihiko
AU - Jinnouchi, Fumiaki
AU - Yamauchi, Takuji
AU - Kikushige, Yoshikane
AU - Kunisaki, Yuya
AU - Kato, Koji
AU - Takenaka, Katsuto
AU - Akashi, Koichi
AU - Miyamoto, Toshihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Japanese Society of Hematology.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Prophylactic use of letermovir (LMV) markedly reduces the incidence of early clinically significant cytomegalovirus (csCMV) infection within the first 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), which improves transplant outcomes. However, some patients eventually develop late-csCMV infection (beyond day 100) after completing LMV prophylaxis. To assess the incidence of late-csCMV infection as well as its risk factors and impacts on transplant outcome, a total of 81 allo-HCT recipients who had not developed early csCMV infection during LMV prophylaxis were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 23 (28.4%) patients developed late-csCMV infection (until day 180) at a median time of 131 days after transplantation and 30 days after LMV discontinuation, respectively. Late-csCMV infection was correlated with apparent delayed immune reconstitution: patients transplanted from HLA-mismatched donors (hazard ratio [HR] = 13.0, p = 0.011) or CMV-IgG-negative donors (HR = 2.39, p = 0.043) had a significantly higher risk. In this study, transplant outcomes did not differ between patients with and without late-csCMV infection. This suggests a need to clarify the efficacy of extended administration of LMV for preventing late-csCMV infection in a larger number of allo-HCT recipients, especially those with “high-risk” donors.
AB - Prophylactic use of letermovir (LMV) markedly reduces the incidence of early clinically significant cytomegalovirus (csCMV) infection within the first 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), which improves transplant outcomes. However, some patients eventually develop late-csCMV infection (beyond day 100) after completing LMV prophylaxis. To assess the incidence of late-csCMV infection as well as its risk factors and impacts on transplant outcome, a total of 81 allo-HCT recipients who had not developed early csCMV infection during LMV prophylaxis were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 23 (28.4%) patients developed late-csCMV infection (until day 180) at a median time of 131 days after transplantation and 30 days after LMV discontinuation, respectively. Late-csCMV infection was correlated with apparent delayed immune reconstitution: patients transplanted from HLA-mismatched donors (hazard ratio [HR] = 13.0, p = 0.011) or CMV-IgG-negative donors (HR = 2.39, p = 0.043) had a significantly higher risk. In this study, transplant outcomes did not differ between patients with and without late-csCMV infection. This suggests a need to clarify the efficacy of extended administration of LMV for preventing late-csCMV infection in a larger number of allo-HCT recipients, especially those with “high-risk” donors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129559584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129559584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12185-022-03348-2
DO - 10.1007/s12185-022-03348-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 35524024
AN - SCOPUS:85129559584
SN - 0925-5710
JO - International Journal of Hematology
JF - International Journal of Hematology
ER -