Seismicity controlled by resistivity structure: The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Kyushu Island, Japan

Koki Aizawa, Hisafumi Asaue, Katsuaki Koike, Shinichi Takakura, Mitsuru Utsugi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Ryokei Yoshimura, Ken'Ichi Yamazaki, Shintaro Komatsu, Makoto Uyeshima, Takao Koyama, Wataru Kanda, Taro Shiotani, Nobuo Matsushima, Maki Hata, Tohru Yoshinaga, Kazunari Uchida, Yuko Tsukashima, Azusa Shito, Shiori FujitaAsuma Wakabayashi, Kaori Tsukamoto, Takeshi Matsushima, Masahiro Miyazaki, Kentaro Kondo, Kanade Takashima, Takeshi Hashimoto, Makoto Tamura, Satoshi Matsumoto, Yusuke Yamashita, Manami Nakamoto, Hiroshi Shimizu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The M JMA 7.3 Kumamoto earthquake that occurred at 1:25 JST on April 16, 2016, not only triggered aftershocks in the vicinity of the epicenter, but also triggered earthquakes that were 50-100 km away from the epicenter of the main shock. The active seismicity can be divided into three regions: (1) the vicinity of the main faults, (2) the northern region of Aso volcano (50 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter), and (3) the regions around three volcanoes, Yufu, Tsurumi, and Garan (100 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter). Notably, the zones between these regions are distinctively seismically inactive. The electric resistivity structure estimated from one-dimensional analysis of the 247 broadband (0.005-3000 s) magnetotelluric and telluric observation sites clearly shows that the earthquakes occurred in resistive regions adjacent to conductive zones or resistive-conductive transition zones. In contrast, seismicity is quite low in electrically conductive zones, which are interpreted as regions of connected fluids. We suggest that the series of the earthquakes was induced by a local accumulated stress and/or fluid supply from conductive zones. Because the relationship between the earthquakes and the resistivity structure is consistent with previous studies, seismic hazard assessment generally can be improved by taking into account the resistivity structure. Following on from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake series, we suggest that there are two zones that have a relatively high potential of earthquake generation along the western extension of the MTL. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Journalearth, planets and space
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

seismicity
electrical resistivity
Japan
earthquakes
earthquake
earthquake epicenter
volcanoes
volcano
fluid
fluids
dimensional analysis
hazard assessment
aftershock
seismic hazard
transition zone
hazards
shock
broadband

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geology
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Seismicity controlled by resistivity structure : The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Kyushu Island, Japan. / Aizawa, Koki; Asaue, Hisafumi; Koike, Katsuaki; Takakura, Shinichi; Utsugi, Mitsuru; Inoue, Hiroyuki; Yoshimura, Ryokei; Yamazaki, Ken'Ichi; Komatsu, Shintaro; Uyeshima, Makoto; Koyama, Takao; Kanda, Wataru; Shiotani, Taro; Matsushima, Nobuo; Hata, Maki; Yoshinaga, Tohru; Uchida, Kazunari; Tsukashima, Yuko; Shito, Azusa; Fujita, Shiori; Wakabayashi, Asuma; Tsukamoto, Kaori; Matsushima, Takeshi; Miyazaki, Masahiro; Kondo, Kentaro; Takashima, Kanade; Hashimoto, Takeshi; Tamura, Makoto; Matsumoto, Satoshi; Yamashita, Yusuke; Nakamoto, Manami; Shimizu, Hiroshi.

In: earth, planets and space, Vol. 69, No. 1, 4, 01.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aizawa, K, Asaue, H, Koike, K, Takakura, S, Utsugi, M, Inoue, H, Yoshimura, R, Yamazaki, KI, Komatsu, S, Uyeshima, M, Koyama, T, Kanda, W, Shiotani, T, Matsushima, N, Hata, M, Yoshinaga, T, Uchida, K, Tsukashima, Y, Shito, A, Fujita, S, Wakabayashi, A, Tsukamoto, K, Matsushima, T, Miyazaki, M, Kondo, K, Takashima, K, Hashimoto, T, Tamura, M, Matsumoto, S, Yamashita, Y, Nakamoto, M & Shimizu, H 2017, 'Seismicity controlled by resistivity structure: The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Kyushu Island, Japan', earth, planets and space, vol. 69, no. 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0590-2
Aizawa, Koki ; Asaue, Hisafumi ; Koike, Katsuaki ; Takakura, Shinichi ; Utsugi, Mitsuru ; Inoue, Hiroyuki ; Yoshimura, Ryokei ; Yamazaki, Ken'Ichi ; Komatsu, Shintaro ; Uyeshima, Makoto ; Koyama, Takao ; Kanda, Wataru ; Shiotani, Taro ; Matsushima, Nobuo ; Hata, Maki ; Yoshinaga, Tohru ; Uchida, Kazunari ; Tsukashima, Yuko ; Shito, Azusa ; Fujita, Shiori ; Wakabayashi, Asuma ; Tsukamoto, Kaori ; Matsushima, Takeshi ; Miyazaki, Masahiro ; Kondo, Kentaro ; Takashima, Kanade ; Hashimoto, Takeshi ; Tamura, Makoto ; Matsumoto, Satoshi ; Yamashita, Yusuke ; Nakamoto, Manami ; Shimizu, Hiroshi. / Seismicity controlled by resistivity structure : The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Kyushu Island, Japan. In: earth, planets and space. 2017 ; Vol. 69, No. 1.
@article{86a320cb297747d19439770b16150c94,
title = "Seismicity controlled by resistivity structure: The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Kyushu Island, Japan",
abstract = "The M JMA 7.3 Kumamoto earthquake that occurred at 1:25 JST on April 16, 2016, not only triggered aftershocks in the vicinity of the epicenter, but also triggered earthquakes that were 50-100 km away from the epicenter of the main shock. The active seismicity can be divided into three regions: (1) the vicinity of the main faults, (2) the northern region of Aso volcano (50 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter), and (3) the regions around three volcanoes, Yufu, Tsurumi, and Garan (100 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter). Notably, the zones between these regions are distinctively seismically inactive. The electric resistivity structure estimated from one-dimensional analysis of the 247 broadband (0.005-3000 s) magnetotelluric and telluric observation sites clearly shows that the earthquakes occurred in resistive regions adjacent to conductive zones or resistive-conductive transition zones. In contrast, seismicity is quite low in electrically conductive zones, which are interpreted as regions of connected fluids. We suggest that the series of the earthquakes was induced by a local accumulated stress and/or fluid supply from conductive zones. Because the relationship between the earthquakes and the resistivity structure is consistent with previous studies, seismic hazard assessment generally can be improved by taking into account the resistivity structure. Following on from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake series, we suggest that there are two zones that have a relatively high potential of earthquake generation along the western extension of the MTL. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]",
author = "Koki Aizawa and Hisafumi Asaue and Katsuaki Koike and Shinichi Takakura and Mitsuru Utsugi and Hiroyuki Inoue and Ryokei Yoshimura and Ken'Ichi Yamazaki and Shintaro Komatsu and Makoto Uyeshima and Takao Koyama and Wataru Kanda and Taro Shiotani and Nobuo Matsushima and Maki Hata and Tohru Yoshinaga and Kazunari Uchida and Yuko Tsukashima and Azusa Shito and Shiori Fujita and Asuma Wakabayashi and Kaori Tsukamoto and Takeshi Matsushima and Masahiro Miyazaki and Kentaro Kondo and Kanade Takashima and Takeshi Hashimoto and Makoto Tamura and Satoshi Matsumoto and Yusuke Yamashita and Manami Nakamoto and Hiroshi Shimizu",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s40623-016-0590-2",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
journal = "Earth, Planets and Space",
issn = "1343-8832",
publisher = "Terra Scientific Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seismicity controlled by resistivity structure

T2 - The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Kyushu Island, Japan

AU - Aizawa, Koki

AU - Asaue, Hisafumi

AU - Koike, Katsuaki

AU - Takakura, Shinichi

AU - Utsugi, Mitsuru

AU - Inoue, Hiroyuki

AU - Yoshimura, Ryokei

AU - Yamazaki, Ken'Ichi

AU - Komatsu, Shintaro

AU - Uyeshima, Makoto

AU - Koyama, Takao

AU - Kanda, Wataru

AU - Shiotani, Taro

AU - Matsushima, Nobuo

AU - Hata, Maki

AU - Yoshinaga, Tohru

AU - Uchida, Kazunari

AU - Tsukashima, Yuko

AU - Shito, Azusa

AU - Fujita, Shiori

AU - Wakabayashi, Asuma

AU - Tsukamoto, Kaori

AU - Matsushima, Takeshi

AU - Miyazaki, Masahiro

AU - Kondo, Kentaro

AU - Takashima, Kanade

AU - Hashimoto, Takeshi

AU - Tamura, Makoto

AU - Matsumoto, Satoshi

AU - Yamashita, Yusuke

AU - Nakamoto, Manami

AU - Shimizu, Hiroshi

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - The M JMA 7.3 Kumamoto earthquake that occurred at 1:25 JST on April 16, 2016, not only triggered aftershocks in the vicinity of the epicenter, but also triggered earthquakes that were 50-100 km away from the epicenter of the main shock. The active seismicity can be divided into three regions: (1) the vicinity of the main faults, (2) the northern region of Aso volcano (50 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter), and (3) the regions around three volcanoes, Yufu, Tsurumi, and Garan (100 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter). Notably, the zones between these regions are distinctively seismically inactive. The electric resistivity structure estimated from one-dimensional analysis of the 247 broadband (0.005-3000 s) magnetotelluric and telluric observation sites clearly shows that the earthquakes occurred in resistive regions adjacent to conductive zones or resistive-conductive transition zones. In contrast, seismicity is quite low in electrically conductive zones, which are interpreted as regions of connected fluids. We suggest that the series of the earthquakes was induced by a local accumulated stress and/or fluid supply from conductive zones. Because the relationship between the earthquakes and the resistivity structure is consistent with previous studies, seismic hazard assessment generally can be improved by taking into account the resistivity structure. Following on from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake series, we suggest that there are two zones that have a relatively high potential of earthquake generation along the western extension of the MTL. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

AB - The M JMA 7.3 Kumamoto earthquake that occurred at 1:25 JST on April 16, 2016, not only triggered aftershocks in the vicinity of the epicenter, but also triggered earthquakes that were 50-100 km away from the epicenter of the main shock. The active seismicity can be divided into three regions: (1) the vicinity of the main faults, (2) the northern region of Aso volcano (50 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter), and (3) the regions around three volcanoes, Yufu, Tsurumi, and Garan (100 km northeast of the mainshock epicenter). Notably, the zones between these regions are distinctively seismically inactive. The electric resistivity structure estimated from one-dimensional analysis of the 247 broadband (0.005-3000 s) magnetotelluric and telluric observation sites clearly shows that the earthquakes occurred in resistive regions adjacent to conductive zones or resistive-conductive transition zones. In contrast, seismicity is quite low in electrically conductive zones, which are interpreted as regions of connected fluids. We suggest that the series of the earthquakes was induced by a local accumulated stress and/or fluid supply from conductive zones. Because the relationship between the earthquakes and the resistivity structure is consistent with previous studies, seismic hazard assessment generally can be improved by taking into account the resistivity structure. Following on from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake series, we suggest that there are two zones that have a relatively high potential of earthquake generation along the western extension of the MTL. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008413160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008413160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40623-016-0590-2

DO - 10.1186/s40623-016-0590-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85008413160

VL - 69

JO - Earth, Planets and Space

JF - Earth, Planets and Space

SN - 1343-8832

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -