TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection criteria for hepatic resection in intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) multiple hepatocellular carcinoma
AU - Wada, Hiroshi
AU - Eguchi, Hidetoshi
AU - Noda, Takehiro
AU - Ogawa, Hisataka
AU - Yamada, Daisaku
AU - Tomimaru, Yoshito
AU - Tomokuni, Akira
AU - Asaoka, Tadafumi
AU - Kawamoto, Koichi
AU - Gotoh, Kunihito
AU - Marubashi, Shigeru
AU - Umeshita, Koji
AU - Nagano, Hiroaki
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Mori, Masaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Background Several reports have suggested that hepatic resection provides a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the intermediate stage of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC-B). The operative indications for multiple BCLC-B have not been established, however. The aim of this study was to clarify the survival benefit of hepatic resection for multinodular BCLC-B HCC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 85 patients with BCLC-B HCC who underwent liver resection. To evaluate clinicopathologic factors and survival, we divided the patients into 3 types based on radiologic findings regarding tumor number and maximum tumor diameter: type 1, up to 3 lesions <5 cm; type 2, up to 3 lesions ≥5 cm or 4 nodules of any size; type 3, >4 nodules. Results Thirty-four patients were classified as type 1, 32 as type 2, and 19 as type 3. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in type 1 were 97.1%, 87.4%, and 75.2%, respectively. Those in type 2 were 84.0%, 74.0%, and 63.0%, and those in type 3 were 64.9%, 55.7%, and 37.1%, respectively. The overall survival of type 1 patients was significantly better than that of type 3 patients. The prognosis of type 2 patients was worse than that of type 1 patients and better than that of type 3. Multivariate analysis identified radiologic tumor size and tumor number as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hepatic resection should be considered a radical treatment for multinodular BCLC-B HCC. Our subclassification can be applied to select the initial treatment and when making decisions regarding hepatic resection of BCLC-B HCC with multiple nodules.
AB - Background Several reports have suggested that hepatic resection provides a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the intermediate stage of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC-B). The operative indications for multiple BCLC-B have not been established, however. The aim of this study was to clarify the survival benefit of hepatic resection for multinodular BCLC-B HCC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 85 patients with BCLC-B HCC who underwent liver resection. To evaluate clinicopathologic factors and survival, we divided the patients into 3 types based on radiologic findings regarding tumor number and maximum tumor diameter: type 1, up to 3 lesions <5 cm; type 2, up to 3 lesions ≥5 cm or 4 nodules of any size; type 3, >4 nodules. Results Thirty-four patients were classified as type 1, 32 as type 2, and 19 as type 3. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in type 1 were 97.1%, 87.4%, and 75.2%, respectively. Those in type 2 were 84.0%, 74.0%, and 63.0%, and those in type 3 were 64.9%, 55.7%, and 37.1%, respectively. The overall survival of type 1 patients was significantly better than that of type 3 patients. The prognosis of type 2 patients was worse than that of type 1 patients and better than that of type 3. Multivariate analysis identified radiologic tumor size and tumor number as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hepatic resection should be considered a radical treatment for multinodular BCLC-B HCC. Our subclassification can be applied to select the initial treatment and when making decisions regarding hepatic resection of BCLC-B HCC with multiple nodules.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994860081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994860081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.023
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 27395761
AN - SCOPUS:84994860081
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 160
SP - 1227
EP - 1235
JO - Surgery
JF - Surgery
IS - 5
ER -