TY - JOUR
T1 - Sequential HBV treatment with tenofovir alafenamide for patients with chronic hepatitis B
T2 - week 96 results from a real-world, multicenter cohort study
AU - The Kyushu University Liver Disease Study (KULDS) Group
AU - Ogawa, Eiichi
AU - Nakamuta, Makoto
AU - Koyanagi, Toshimasa
AU - Ooho, Aritsune
AU - Furusyo, Norihiro
AU - Kajiwara, Eiji
AU - Dohmen, Kazufumi
AU - Kawano, Akira
AU - Satoh, Takeaki
AU - Takahashi, Kazuhiro
AU - Azuma, Koichi
AU - Yamashita, Nobuyuki
AU - Yamashita, Naoki
AU - Sugimoto, Rie
AU - Amagase, Hiromasa
AU - Kuniyoshi, Masami
AU - Ichiki, Yasunori
AU - Morita, Chie
AU - Kato, Masaki
AU - Shimoda, Shinji
AU - Nomura, Hideyuki
AU - Hayashi, Jun
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Gilead Sciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background and aims: Outcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least 2 years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Results: The proportions of complete viral suppression (CVS) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 98.5%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n = 198), TDF (n = 137), and NA combination (n = 123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20–2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved CVS at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, p < 0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those without (coefficient 21.7, p < 0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48. Conclusions: Based on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.
AB - Background and aims: Outcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least 2 years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Results: The proportions of complete viral suppression (CVS) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 98.5%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n = 198), TDF (n = 137), and NA combination (n = 123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20–2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved CVS at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, p < 0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those without (coefficient 21.7, p < 0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48. Conclusions: Based on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123777898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123777898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12072-021-10295-3
DO - 10.1007/s12072-021-10295-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 35075593
AN - SCOPUS:85123777898
VL - 16
SP - 282
EP - 293
JO - Hepatology International
JF - Hepatology International
SN - 1936-0533
IS - 2
ER -