Service quality and performance measurement: Evidence from the Indian water sector

Surender Kumar, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The conventional measures of benchmarking focus mainly on the water produced or water delivered, and ignore the service quality, and as a result the 'low-cost and low-quality' utilities are rated as efficient units. Benchmarking must credit utilities for improvements in service delivery. This study measures the performance of 20 urban water utilities using data from an Asian Development Bank survey of Indian water utilities in 2005. It applies data envelopment analysis to measure the performance of utilities. The results reveal that incorporation of a quality dimension into the analysis significantly increases the average performance of utilities. The difference between conventional quantity-based measures and quality-adjusted estimates implies that there are significant opportunity costs of maintaining the quality of services in water delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-191
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Water Resources Development
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

performance measurement
water
benchmarking
evidence
Asian Development Bank
data envelopment analysis
cost
performance
opportunity costs
service quality
credit
bank
data analysis
costs
services

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Service quality and performance measurement : Evidence from the Indian water sector. / Kumar, Surender; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: International Journal of Water Resources Development, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.06.2010, p. 173-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9900f01c1fc94dfdb2ea687f7ec26565,
title = "Service quality and performance measurement: Evidence from the Indian water sector",
abstract = "The conventional measures of benchmarking focus mainly on the water produced or water delivered, and ignore the service quality, and as a result the 'low-cost and low-quality' utilities are rated as efficient units. Benchmarking must credit utilities for improvements in service delivery. This study measures the performance of 20 urban water utilities using data from an Asian Development Bank survey of Indian water utilities in 2005. It applies data envelopment analysis to measure the performance of utilities. The results reveal that incorporation of a quality dimension into the analysis significantly increases the average performance of utilities. The difference between conventional quantity-based measures and quality-adjusted estimates implies that there are significant opportunity costs of maintaining the quality of services in water delivery.",
author = "Surender Kumar and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07900621003655726",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "173--191",
journal = "International Journal of Water Resources Development",
issn = "0790-0627",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Service quality and performance measurement

T2 - Evidence from the Indian water sector

AU - Kumar, Surender

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - The conventional measures of benchmarking focus mainly on the water produced or water delivered, and ignore the service quality, and as a result the 'low-cost and low-quality' utilities are rated as efficient units. Benchmarking must credit utilities for improvements in service delivery. This study measures the performance of 20 urban water utilities using data from an Asian Development Bank survey of Indian water utilities in 2005. It applies data envelopment analysis to measure the performance of utilities. The results reveal that incorporation of a quality dimension into the analysis significantly increases the average performance of utilities. The difference between conventional quantity-based measures and quality-adjusted estimates implies that there are significant opportunity costs of maintaining the quality of services in water delivery.

AB - The conventional measures of benchmarking focus mainly on the water produced or water delivered, and ignore the service quality, and as a result the 'low-cost and low-quality' utilities are rated as efficient units. Benchmarking must credit utilities for improvements in service delivery. This study measures the performance of 20 urban water utilities using data from an Asian Development Bank survey of Indian water utilities in 2005. It applies data envelopment analysis to measure the performance of utilities. The results reveal that incorporation of a quality dimension into the analysis significantly increases the average performance of utilities. The difference between conventional quantity-based measures and quality-adjusted estimates implies that there are significant opportunity costs of maintaining the quality of services in water delivery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953673768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953673768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07900621003655726

DO - 10.1080/07900621003655726

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953673768

VL - 26

SP - 173

EP - 191

JO - International Journal of Water Resources Development

JF - International Journal of Water Resources Development

SN - 0790-0627

IS - 2

ER -