TY - JOUR
T1 - Shielding effect of protective seats during CT examination
AU - Fujibuchi, Toshiou
AU - Kato, Hideyuki
AU - Hashimoto, Masatoshi
AU - Ochi, Shigehiro
AU - Yanagawa, Noriyuki
AU - Morita, Fuminori
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - Because the exposure to radiation from CT scanning is higher than that from other X-ray diagnostic devices, it is necessary to lower this exposure. In this study, we placed a protective seat on the abdomen and dorsal side of a human body phantom. Three different kinds of CT units, with a single detector, four detectors, and 16 detectors, were used to compare the absorbed dose on the skin surface and uterus. Head and chest CT scans were taken with the standard protocol. The difference in exposure to the uterus with and without the protective shield was found to be small. Exposure to the skin surface was about 0.2 mGy without the protective seat. We found that the exposure dose to chest could be reduced as much as 50% by using the protective seat. Effective radiation differs depending on the institution, and these differences can be more than the amount that can be reduced by using the protective seat. Thus, we conclude that it is important for each institution to determine the best protocol optimization for each individual.
AB - Because the exposure to radiation from CT scanning is higher than that from other X-ray diagnostic devices, it is necessary to lower this exposure. In this study, we placed a protective seat on the abdomen and dorsal side of a human body phantom. Three different kinds of CT units, with a single detector, four detectors, and 16 detectors, were used to compare the absorbed dose on the skin surface and uterus. Head and chest CT scans were taken with the standard protocol. The difference in exposure to the uterus with and without the protective shield was found to be small. Exposure to the skin surface was about 0.2 mGy without the protective seat. We found that the exposure dose to chest could be reduced as much as 50% by using the protective seat. Effective radiation differs depending on the institution, and these differences can be more than the amount that can be reduced by using the protective seat. Thus, we conclude that it is important for each institution to determine the best protocol optimization for each individual.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16644392804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16644392804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6009/jjrt.KJ00003560638
DO - 10.6009/jjrt.KJ00003560638
M3 - Article
C2 - 15614225
AN - SCOPUS:16644392804
SN - 0369-4305
VL - 60
SP - 1730
EP - 1738
JO - Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
JF - Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
IS - 12
ER -