Short-term outcomes of open liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection: Secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective study (CSGO-HBP-004)

Shogo Kobayashi, Keisuke Fukui, Yutaka Takeda, Shin Nakahira, Masanori Tsujie, Junzo Shimizu, Atsushi Miyamoto, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Hiroaki Nagano, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection (LLR and OLR, respectively), and we first analyzed a preoperatively enrolled and prospectively collected database. We carried out a secondary analysis using a preoperative enrolled database that included the details of 786 patients who had been enrolled in a previously carried out randomized controlled trial to assess short-term outcomes, including morbidities. Statistical analyses included logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM) with replacement, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses. Among 780 liver resections, OLR was carried out in 543 patients and LLR was carried out in 237 patients. LLR was selected in patients with a worse liver function and was related to a smaller resected liver weight and/or partial resection. Logistic regression, PSM, and IPTW analyses revealed that LLR was associated with less blood loss and a lower incidence of morbidities, but a longer operating time. LLR was found to be a preferred factor in biliary leakage by IPTW only. LLR was a preferred factor for blood loss, morbidities and hospital stay, but was associated with a longer operating time. UMIN-CTR, UMIN000003324.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-94
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Short-term outcomes of open liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection: Secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective study (CSGO-HBP-004)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this