TY - JOUR
T1 - Size-dependent sex change can be the ESS without any size advantage of reproduction when mortality is size-dependent
AU - Brooks, Mollie
AU - Iwasa, Yoh
PY - 2010/11/1
Y1 - 2010/11/1
N2 - Almost all models of sex change evolution assume that reproductive rate increases with body size. However, size-dependent sex changing plants often show size-independent reproductive success, presumably due to pollen limitation. Can the observed size-dependent sex change pattern be the ESS in this case? To answer this question, we analyze a game model of size-dependent sex expression in plants. We assume: (1) reproductive rate is perfectly independent of size; (2) mortality decreases with size in the same way for both sexes; (3) growth rates decrease at maturity, more for females than males. We show that the ESS is size-dependent sex expression: small individuals are vegetative, intermediate individuals are male, and large individuals are female. These results demonstrate that mortality is important in size-dependent sex allocation even when mortality rate is independent of sex. They also offer an explanation of why we see populations in poor environments to have sex ratios more biased toward the first sex relative to high quality environments.
AB - Almost all models of sex change evolution assume that reproductive rate increases with body size. However, size-dependent sex changing plants often show size-independent reproductive success, presumably due to pollen limitation. Can the observed size-dependent sex change pattern be the ESS in this case? To answer this question, we analyze a game model of size-dependent sex expression in plants. We assume: (1) reproductive rate is perfectly independent of size; (2) mortality decreases with size in the same way for both sexes; (3) growth rates decrease at maturity, more for females than males. We show that the ESS is size-dependent sex expression: small individuals are vegetative, intermediate individuals are male, and large individuals are female. These results demonstrate that mortality is important in size-dependent sex allocation even when mortality rate is independent of sex. They also offer an explanation of why we see populations in poor environments to have sex ratios more biased toward the first sex relative to high quality environments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956886318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956886318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.07.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 20673775
AN - SCOPUS:77956886318
VL - 78
SP - 183
EP - 191
JO - Theoretical Population Biology
JF - Theoretical Population Biology
SN - 0040-5809
IS - 3
ER -