Social safeguards in national and sub-national redd+ initiatives

A comparison based on literature review

Seiji Iwanaga, Yasuhiro Yokota, Kimihiko Hyakumura

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

REDD+ is an approach to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, using economic incentives to influence behavior. The need for safeguards has emerged to avoid the negative social and environmental impacts caused by an overemphasis of such economic incentives. In the context of safeguards, in addition to the UNFCCC's official efforts, voluntary activities (initiatives) by many organizations have attempted to formulate principles, criteria, indicators and guidelines. In this article, we clarified the elements to enhance social safeguards and discussed how those elements are included in each initiative. We reviewed the literature on the SEPC, SESA and REDD+ SES initiatives, and clarified the focal points and problems relating to social safeguards. We found that benefit-sharing is an important aspect of social safeguards, and that more discussions are needed to enhance initiatives. The REDD+ SES initiative has received little criticism in literature to date and has the best-covered elements including "benefit-sharing" among the three initiatives. If more countries adopt REDD+ SES and more cases can be accumulated to identify problems and solutions, it could become a popular initiative in the international community to enhance the social safeguards in REDD+.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-43
Number of pages13
JournalJapan Agricultural Research Quarterly
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

economic incentives
literature review
Motivation
Economics
social impact
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Conservation of Natural Resources
Social Change
deforestation
environmental impact
Organizations
Guidelines
degradation
economic incentive
comparison
Forests
need
indicator

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biotechnology
  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Social safeguards in national and sub-national redd+ initiatives : A comparison based on literature review. / Iwanaga, Seiji; Yokota, Yasuhiro; Hyakumura, Kimihiko.

In: Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 31-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{aef0d421797442a3bf2a6c7dbbb90af7,
title = "Social safeguards in national and sub-national redd+ initiatives: A comparison based on literature review",
abstract = "REDD+ is an approach to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, using economic incentives to influence behavior. The need for safeguards has emerged to avoid the negative social and environmental impacts caused by an overemphasis of such economic incentives. In the context of safeguards, in addition to the UNFCCC's official efforts, voluntary activities (initiatives) by many organizations have attempted to formulate principles, criteria, indicators and guidelines. In this article, we clarified the elements to enhance social safeguards and discussed how those elements are included in each initiative. We reviewed the literature on the SEPC, SESA and REDD+ SES initiatives, and clarified the focal points and problems relating to social safeguards. We found that benefit-sharing is an important aspect of social safeguards, and that more discussions are needed to enhance initiatives. The REDD+ SES initiative has received little criticism in literature to date and has the best-covered elements including {"}benefit-sharing{"} among the three initiatives. If more countries adopt REDD+ SES and more cases can be accumulated to identify problems and solutions, it could become a popular initiative in the international community to enhance the social safeguards in REDD+.",
author = "Seiji Iwanaga and Yasuhiro Yokota and Kimihiko Hyakumura",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.6090/jarq.51.31",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "31--43",
journal = "Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly",
issn = "0021-3551",
publisher = "Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social safeguards in national and sub-national redd+ initiatives

T2 - A comparison based on literature review

AU - Iwanaga, Seiji

AU - Yokota, Yasuhiro

AU - Hyakumura, Kimihiko

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - REDD+ is an approach to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, using economic incentives to influence behavior. The need for safeguards has emerged to avoid the negative social and environmental impacts caused by an overemphasis of such economic incentives. In the context of safeguards, in addition to the UNFCCC's official efforts, voluntary activities (initiatives) by many organizations have attempted to formulate principles, criteria, indicators and guidelines. In this article, we clarified the elements to enhance social safeguards and discussed how those elements are included in each initiative. We reviewed the literature on the SEPC, SESA and REDD+ SES initiatives, and clarified the focal points and problems relating to social safeguards. We found that benefit-sharing is an important aspect of social safeguards, and that more discussions are needed to enhance initiatives. The REDD+ SES initiative has received little criticism in literature to date and has the best-covered elements including "benefit-sharing" among the three initiatives. If more countries adopt REDD+ SES and more cases can be accumulated to identify problems and solutions, it could become a popular initiative in the international community to enhance the social safeguards in REDD+.

AB - REDD+ is an approach to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, using economic incentives to influence behavior. The need for safeguards has emerged to avoid the negative social and environmental impacts caused by an overemphasis of such economic incentives. In the context of safeguards, in addition to the UNFCCC's official efforts, voluntary activities (initiatives) by many organizations have attempted to formulate principles, criteria, indicators and guidelines. In this article, we clarified the elements to enhance social safeguards and discussed how those elements are included in each initiative. We reviewed the literature on the SEPC, SESA and REDD+ SES initiatives, and clarified the focal points and problems relating to social safeguards. We found that benefit-sharing is an important aspect of social safeguards, and that more discussions are needed to enhance initiatives. The REDD+ SES initiative has received little criticism in literature to date and has the best-covered elements including "benefit-sharing" among the three initiatives. If more countries adopt REDD+ SES and more cases can be accumulated to identify problems and solutions, it could become a popular initiative in the international community to enhance the social safeguards in REDD+.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011992417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011992417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.6090/jarq.51.31

DO - 10.6090/jarq.51.31

M3 - Review article

VL - 51

SP - 31

EP - 43

JO - Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly

JF - Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly

SN - 0021-3551

IS - 1

ER -