Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol: A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data

Dongchul Kim, Mian Chin, Hongbin Yu, Thomas Diehl, Qian Tan, Ralph A. Kahn, Kostas Tsigaridis, Susanne E. Bauer, Toshihiko Takemura, Luca Pozzoli, Nicolas Bellouin, Michael Schulz, Sophie Peyridieu, Alain Chédin, Brigitte Koffi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    47 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study evaluates model-simulated dust aerosols over North Africa and the North Atlantic from five global models that participated in the Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models phase II model experiments. The model results are compared with satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), and Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor, dust optical depth (DOD) derived from MODIS and MISR, AOD and coarse-mode AOD (as a proxy of DOD) from ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network Sun photometer measurements, and dust vertical distributions/centroid height from Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder satellite AOD retrievals. We examine the following quantities of AOD and DOD: (1) the magnitudes over land and over ocean in our study domain, (2) the longitudinal gradient from the dust source region over North Africa to the western North Atlantic, (3) seasonal variations at different locations, and (4) the dust vertical profile shape and the AOD centroid height (altitude above or below which half of the AOD is located). The different satellite data show consistent features in most of these aspects; however, the models display large diversity in all of them, with significant differences among the models and between models and observations. By examining dust emission, removal, and mass extinction efficiency in the five models, we also find remarkable differences among the models that all contribute to the discrepancies of model-simulated dust amount and distribution. This study highlights the challenges in simulating the dust physical and optical processes, even in the best known dust environment, and stresses the need for observable quantities to constrain the model processes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)6259-6277
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
    Volume119
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 27 2014

    Fingerprint

    aerosols
    Aerosols
    sinks
    dust
    remote sensing
    Dust
    Remote sensing
    optical depth
    optical thickness
    aerosol
    MISR
    spectroradiometers
    Imaging techniques
    MODIS (radiometry)
    moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer
    Satellites
    Northern Africa
    MODIS
    centroids
    comparison

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Geophysics
    • Forestry
    • Oceanography
    • Aquatic Science
    • Ecology
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Soil Science
    • Geochemistry and Petrology
    • Earth-Surface Processes
    • Atmospheric Science
    • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Space and Planetary Science
    • Palaeontology

    Cite this

    Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol : A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data. / Kim, Dongchul; Chin, Mian; Yu, Hongbin; Diehl, Thomas; Tan, Qian; Kahn, Ralph A.; Tsigaridis, Kostas; Bauer, Susanne E.; Takemura, Toshihiko; Pozzoli, Luca; Bellouin, Nicolas; Schulz, Michael; Peyridieu, Sophie; Chédin, Alain; Koffi, Brigitte.

    In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 119, No. 10, 27.05.2014, p. 6259-6277.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Kim, D, Chin, M, Yu, H, Diehl, T, Tan, Q, Kahn, RA, Tsigaridis, K, Bauer, SE, Takemura, T, Pozzoli, L, Bellouin, N, Schulz, M, Peyridieu, S, Chédin, A & Koffi, B 2014, 'Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol: A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data', Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 119, no. 10, pp. 6259-6277. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021099
    Kim, Dongchul ; Chin, Mian ; Yu, Hongbin ; Diehl, Thomas ; Tan, Qian ; Kahn, Ralph A. ; Tsigaridis, Kostas ; Bauer, Susanne E. ; Takemura, Toshihiko ; Pozzoli, Luca ; Bellouin, Nicolas ; Schulz, Michael ; Peyridieu, Sophie ; Chédin, Alain ; Koffi, Brigitte. / Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol : A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data. In: Journal of Geophysical Research. 2014 ; Vol. 119, No. 10. pp. 6259-6277.
    @article{44481413975649069689f65025f2face,
    title = "Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol: A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data",
    abstract = "This study evaluates model-simulated dust aerosols over North Africa and the North Atlantic from five global models that participated in the Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models phase II model experiments. The model results are compared with satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), and Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor, dust optical depth (DOD) derived from MODIS and MISR, AOD and coarse-mode AOD (as a proxy of DOD) from ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network Sun photometer measurements, and dust vertical distributions/centroid height from Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder satellite AOD retrievals. We examine the following quantities of AOD and DOD: (1) the magnitudes over land and over ocean in our study domain, (2) the longitudinal gradient from the dust source region over North Africa to the western North Atlantic, (3) seasonal variations at different locations, and (4) the dust vertical profile shape and the AOD centroid height (altitude above or below which half of the AOD is located). The different satellite data show consistent features in most of these aspects; however, the models display large diversity in all of them, with significant differences among the models and between models and observations. By examining dust emission, removal, and mass extinction efficiency in the five models, we also find remarkable differences among the models that all contribute to the discrepancies of model-simulated dust amount and distribution. This study highlights the challenges in simulating the dust physical and optical processes, even in the best known dust environment, and stresses the need for observable quantities to constrain the model processes.",
    author = "Dongchul Kim and Mian Chin and Hongbin Yu and Thomas Diehl and Qian Tan and Kahn, {Ralph A.} and Kostas Tsigaridis and Bauer, {Susanne E.} and Toshihiko Takemura and Luca Pozzoli and Nicolas Bellouin and Michael Schulz and Sophie Peyridieu and Alain Ch{\'e}din and Brigitte Koffi",
    year = "2014",
    month = "5",
    day = "27",
    doi = "10.1002/2013JD021099",
    language = "English",
    volume = "119",
    pages = "6259--6277",
    journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
    issn = "0148-0227",
    number = "10",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol

    T2 - A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data

    AU - Kim, Dongchul

    AU - Chin, Mian

    AU - Yu, Hongbin

    AU - Diehl, Thomas

    AU - Tan, Qian

    AU - Kahn, Ralph A.

    AU - Tsigaridis, Kostas

    AU - Bauer, Susanne E.

    AU - Takemura, Toshihiko

    AU - Pozzoli, Luca

    AU - Bellouin, Nicolas

    AU - Schulz, Michael

    AU - Peyridieu, Sophie

    AU - Chédin, Alain

    AU - Koffi, Brigitte

    PY - 2014/5/27

    Y1 - 2014/5/27

    N2 - This study evaluates model-simulated dust aerosols over North Africa and the North Atlantic from five global models that participated in the Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models phase II model experiments. The model results are compared with satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), and Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor, dust optical depth (DOD) derived from MODIS and MISR, AOD and coarse-mode AOD (as a proxy of DOD) from ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network Sun photometer measurements, and dust vertical distributions/centroid height from Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder satellite AOD retrievals. We examine the following quantities of AOD and DOD: (1) the magnitudes over land and over ocean in our study domain, (2) the longitudinal gradient from the dust source region over North Africa to the western North Atlantic, (3) seasonal variations at different locations, and (4) the dust vertical profile shape and the AOD centroid height (altitude above or below which half of the AOD is located). The different satellite data show consistent features in most of these aspects; however, the models display large diversity in all of them, with significant differences among the models and between models and observations. By examining dust emission, removal, and mass extinction efficiency in the five models, we also find remarkable differences among the models that all contribute to the discrepancies of model-simulated dust amount and distribution. This study highlights the challenges in simulating the dust physical and optical processes, even in the best known dust environment, and stresses the need for observable quantities to constrain the model processes.

    AB - This study evaluates model-simulated dust aerosols over North Africa and the North Atlantic from five global models that participated in the Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models phase II model experiments. The model results are compared with satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), and Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor, dust optical depth (DOD) derived from MODIS and MISR, AOD and coarse-mode AOD (as a proxy of DOD) from ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network Sun photometer measurements, and dust vertical distributions/centroid height from Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder satellite AOD retrievals. We examine the following quantities of AOD and DOD: (1) the magnitudes over land and over ocean in our study domain, (2) the longitudinal gradient from the dust source region over North Africa to the western North Atlantic, (3) seasonal variations at different locations, and (4) the dust vertical profile shape and the AOD centroid height (altitude above or below which half of the AOD is located). The different satellite data show consistent features in most of these aspects; however, the models display large diversity in all of them, with significant differences among the models and between models and observations. By examining dust emission, removal, and mass extinction efficiency in the five models, we also find remarkable differences among the models that all contribute to the discrepancies of model-simulated dust amount and distribution. This study highlights the challenges in simulating the dust physical and optical processes, even in the best known dust environment, and stresses the need for observable quantities to constrain the model processes.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902787498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902787498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/2013JD021099

    DO - 10.1002/2013JD021099

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84902787498

    VL - 119

    SP - 6259

    EP - 6277

    JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

    JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

    SN - 0148-0227

    IS - 10

    ER -