Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection

Stephen Palmisano, Deborah Apthorp, Takeharu Senoo, Paul J. Stapley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability - measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open - was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1185-1191
Number of pages7
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume232
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Optic Flow
Individuality
Head

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection. / Palmisano, Stephen; Apthorp, Deborah; Senoo, Takeharu; Stapley, Paul J.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 232, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 1185-1191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palmisano, Stephen ; Apthorp, Deborah ; Senoo, Takeharu ; Stapley, Paul J. / Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2014 ; Vol. 232, No. 4. pp. 1185-1191.
@article{f71b9d14a3fd417495ca309428652004,
title = "Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection",
abstract = "This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability - measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open - was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.",
author = "Stephen Palmisano and Deborah Apthorp and Takeharu Senoo and Stapley, {Paul J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "1185--1191",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection

AU - Palmisano, Stephen

AU - Apthorp, Deborah

AU - Senoo, Takeharu

AU - Stapley, Paul J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability - measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open - was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.

AB - This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability - measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open - was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897027297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897027297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y

DO - 10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y

M3 - Article

VL - 232

SP - 1185

EP - 1191

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 4

ER -