TY - JOUR
T1 - Statistical studies using AIC method to decide the question of "break" or "straight" in arrhenius plots of water proton NMR relaxation times in chilling-sensitive vigna and insensitive pisum seedlings
AU - Iwaya-inoue, Mari
AU - Sakaguchi, Koji
AU - Kaku, Shosuke
PY - 1989/3
Y1 - 1989/3
N2 - The question of "break" or "straight" in Arrhenius plots for the temperature dependency of NMR relaxation times (T1) of water protons in etiolated intact seedlings for chilling-sensitive two Vigna species and chilling-insensitive Pisum was statistically studied using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), a versatile procedure for statistical model identification. Among seven models, the most appropriate was based on the following assumptions: individual k (preparation numbers) two-half lines connecting at the break point (TCB) and imposing no restrictions for the gradient and the break point (Model 7). The worst two models were one straight line or one TCB (Model 1 or 4). Thus, the data obtained from replicated preparations should not be treated as a whole but as individual in each sample case. Break points determined with Model 7 ranged around 11-5°C for V. radiata and 17-10°C for V. mungo. The implication of the occurrence of "break" for Pisum clearly differed from Vigna judging by the model fitness based on the AIC values. The question of "break" or "straight" in Arrhenius plots is therefore fairly dependent on the validity of the model selection in the statistical analysis, and the AIC method is a useful procedure for the resolution of the problem of the "use" or "misuse" of Arrhenius plots in plant physiology.
AB - The question of "break" or "straight" in Arrhenius plots for the temperature dependency of NMR relaxation times (T1) of water protons in etiolated intact seedlings for chilling-sensitive two Vigna species and chilling-insensitive Pisum was statistically studied using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), a versatile procedure for statistical model identification. Among seven models, the most appropriate was based on the following assumptions: individual k (preparation numbers) two-half lines connecting at the break point (TCB) and imposing no restrictions for the gradient and the break point (Model 7). The worst two models were one straight line or one TCB (Model 1 or 4). Thus, the data obtained from replicated preparations should not be treated as a whole but as individual in each sample case. Break points determined with Model 7 ranged around 11-5°C for V. radiata and 17-10°C for V. mungo. The implication of the occurrence of "break" for Pisum clearly differed from Vigna judging by the model fitness based on the AIC values. The question of "break" or "straight" in Arrhenius plots is therefore fairly dependent on the validity of the model selection in the statistical analysis, and the AIC method is a useful procedure for the resolution of the problem of the "use" or "misuse" of Arrhenius plots in plant physiology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013612962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013612962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077744
DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077744
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0013612962
SN - 0032-0781
VL - 30
SP - 309
EP - 316
JO - Plant and Cell Physiology
JF - Plant and Cell Physiology
IS - 2
ER -