Stress intensity factors of embedded elliptical cracks and an assessment of the ASME XI defect recharacterisation criteria

Hiroshi Noguchi, R. A. Smith, J. J. Carruthers, M. D. Gilchrist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers aspects related to the calculation of the stress intensity factors of planar embedded defects in a solid under tension. The determination of stress intensity factor solutions using a modified body force method is described, this technique having certain advantages over existing finite element, boundary element and ordinary body force methods. Furthermore, comprehensive modified body force solutions are presented and discussed for a range of elliptical defect geometries. These solutions have then been used to assess the conservation of the recharacterisation procedure for defects of complex geometry described in Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Maximum stress intensity factor values calculated using both the modified body force method and the ASME XI rules in conjunction with standard solutions are compared and contrasted. The results of this analysis show that, by and large. ASME XI is conservative and hence safe. However, geometries for which ASME XI provides non-conservative estimates have been encountered and, in certain circumstances, this may be a cause for concern.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Stress intensity factors
Cracks
Defects
Geometry
Insulator Elements
Pressure vessel codes
Boilers
Conservation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Stress intensity factors of embedded elliptical cracks and an assessment of the ASME XI defect recharacterisation criteria. / Noguchi, Hiroshi; Smith, R. A.; Carruthers, J. J.; Gilchrist, M. D.

In: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 70, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 69-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bfefb60ca86445df83b30328b51a4204,
title = "Stress intensity factors of embedded elliptical cracks and an assessment of the ASME XI defect recharacterisation criteria",
abstract = "This paper considers aspects related to the calculation of the stress intensity factors of planar embedded defects in a solid under tension. The determination of stress intensity factor solutions using a modified body force method is described, this technique having certain advantages over existing finite element, boundary element and ordinary body force methods. Furthermore, comprehensive modified body force solutions are presented and discussed for a range of elliptical defect geometries. These solutions have then been used to assess the conservation of the recharacterisation procedure for defects of complex geometry described in Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Maximum stress intensity factor values calculated using both the modified body force method and the ASME XI rules in conjunction with standard solutions are compared and contrasted. The results of this analysis show that, by and large. ASME XI is conservative and hence safe. However, geometries for which ASME XI provides non-conservative estimates have been encountered and, in certain circumstances, this may be a cause for concern.",
author = "Hiroshi Noguchi and Smith, {R. A.} and Carruthers, {J. J.} and Gilchrist, {M. D.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00048-8",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "69--76",
journal = "International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping",
issn = "0308-0161",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress intensity factors of embedded elliptical cracks and an assessment of the ASME XI defect recharacterisation criteria

AU - Noguchi, Hiroshi

AU - Smith, R. A.

AU - Carruthers, J. J.

AU - Gilchrist, M. D.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - This paper considers aspects related to the calculation of the stress intensity factors of planar embedded defects in a solid under tension. The determination of stress intensity factor solutions using a modified body force method is described, this technique having certain advantages over existing finite element, boundary element and ordinary body force methods. Furthermore, comprehensive modified body force solutions are presented and discussed for a range of elliptical defect geometries. These solutions have then been used to assess the conservation of the recharacterisation procedure for defects of complex geometry described in Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Maximum stress intensity factor values calculated using both the modified body force method and the ASME XI rules in conjunction with standard solutions are compared and contrasted. The results of this analysis show that, by and large. ASME XI is conservative and hence safe. However, geometries for which ASME XI provides non-conservative estimates have been encountered and, in certain circumstances, this may be a cause for concern.

AB - This paper considers aspects related to the calculation of the stress intensity factors of planar embedded defects in a solid under tension. The determination of stress intensity factor solutions using a modified body force method is described, this technique having certain advantages over existing finite element, boundary element and ordinary body force methods. Furthermore, comprehensive modified body force solutions are presented and discussed for a range of elliptical defect geometries. These solutions have then been used to assess the conservation of the recharacterisation procedure for defects of complex geometry described in Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Maximum stress intensity factor values calculated using both the modified body force method and the ASME XI rules in conjunction with standard solutions are compared and contrasted. The results of this analysis show that, by and large. ASME XI is conservative and hence safe. However, geometries for which ASME XI provides non-conservative estimates have been encountered and, in certain circumstances, this may be a cause for concern.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030735191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030735191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00048-8

DO - 10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00048-8

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 69

EP - 76

JO - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

JF - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

SN - 0308-0161

IS - 1

ER -