SU‐E‐I‐43: Verification of the Usefulness of Evaluation Method for Angular Performance with the ANG Test Pattern

Y. Ikushima, H. Akamine, Y. Nakamura, N. Hashimoto, J. Morishita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: A simple method with the ANG test pattern to evaluate the angular performance of medical‐grade liquid‐crystal display (LCD) monitors was proposed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in December 2009 (IEC 62563‐1). The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between the results obtained by using the ANG test pattern and the angular performance measured by a luminance meter. We also examined the effect of ambient‐light conditions on the results evaluated by using the ANG test pattern. Methods: Three LCDs, a medical‐grade monochrome LCD (Radiforce GS220, 500 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), a medical‐grade color LCD (Radiforce RX211, 300 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), and a general‐purpose LCD (SyncMaster940B, 180 cd/m2, Samsung) were used in this study. The ANG test pattern was observed by eight observers under three ambient‐light conditions (0, 35, and 327 lux). Two different scoring methods were used. One is the method proposed by the IEC 62563‐1, and the other is the method modified for comparison of results measured by a luminance meter. The luminance performance was measured as a function of viewing angle, and evaluated as the relative contrast ratio. Finally, the results in terms of the modified scores were compared to the luminance performance in various viewing angles. Results: Variations of the modified scores and the relative contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle indicated a similar tendency for medical‐grade LCDs. On the other hand, the two results did not correspond well for the general‐purpose LCD. The difference between the results obtained at 0 and 327 lux was 0.11 at a maximum for all LCDs used in this study. Conclusions: The evaluation method with the ANG test pattern is considered to be useful for evaluation of the angular performance for medical‐grade LCDs taking ambient‐light conditions into consideration.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
JournalMedical physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Research Design
Color

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐I‐43 : Verification of the Usefulness of Evaluation Method for Angular Performance with the ANG Test Pattern. / Ikushima, Y.; Akamine, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Hashimoto, N.; Morishita, J.

In: Medical physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 06.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4733e0cbdb4444b9f1bfeb503ffb608,
title = "SU‐E‐I‐43: Verification of the Usefulness of Evaluation Method for Angular Performance with the ANG Test Pattern",
abstract = "Purpose: A simple method with the ANG test pattern to evaluate the angular performance of medical‐grade liquid‐crystal display (LCD) monitors was proposed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in December 2009 (IEC 62563‐1). The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between the results obtained by using the ANG test pattern and the angular performance measured by a luminance meter. We also examined the effect of ambient‐light conditions on the results evaluated by using the ANG test pattern. Methods: Three LCDs, a medical‐grade monochrome LCD (Radiforce GS220, 500 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), a medical‐grade color LCD (Radiforce RX211, 300 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), and a general‐purpose LCD (SyncMaster940B, 180 cd/m2, Samsung) were used in this study. The ANG test pattern was observed by eight observers under three ambient‐light conditions (0, 35, and 327 lux). Two different scoring methods were used. One is the method proposed by the IEC 62563‐1, and the other is the method modified for comparison of results measured by a luminance meter. The luminance performance was measured as a function of viewing angle, and evaluated as the relative contrast ratio. Finally, the results in terms of the modified scores were compared to the luminance performance in various viewing angles. Results: Variations of the modified scores and the relative contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle indicated a similar tendency for medical‐grade LCDs. On the other hand, the two results did not correspond well for the general‐purpose LCD. The difference between the results obtained at 0 and 327 lux was 0.11 at a maximum for all LCDs used in this study. Conclusions: The evaluation method with the ANG test pattern is considered to be useful for evaluation of the angular performance for medical‐grade LCDs taking ambient‐light conditions into consideration.",
author = "Y. Ikushima and H. Akamine and Y. Nakamura and N. Hashimoto and J. Morishita",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1118/1.3611616",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐I‐43

T2 - Verification of the Usefulness of Evaluation Method for Angular Performance with the ANG Test Pattern

AU - Ikushima, Y.

AU - Akamine, H.

AU - Nakamura, Y.

AU - Hashimoto, N.

AU - Morishita, J.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Purpose: A simple method with the ANG test pattern to evaluate the angular performance of medical‐grade liquid‐crystal display (LCD) monitors was proposed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in December 2009 (IEC 62563‐1). The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between the results obtained by using the ANG test pattern and the angular performance measured by a luminance meter. We also examined the effect of ambient‐light conditions on the results evaluated by using the ANG test pattern. Methods: Three LCDs, a medical‐grade monochrome LCD (Radiforce GS220, 500 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), a medical‐grade color LCD (Radiforce RX211, 300 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), and a general‐purpose LCD (SyncMaster940B, 180 cd/m2, Samsung) were used in this study. The ANG test pattern was observed by eight observers under three ambient‐light conditions (0, 35, and 327 lux). Two different scoring methods were used. One is the method proposed by the IEC 62563‐1, and the other is the method modified for comparison of results measured by a luminance meter. The luminance performance was measured as a function of viewing angle, and evaluated as the relative contrast ratio. Finally, the results in terms of the modified scores were compared to the luminance performance in various viewing angles. Results: Variations of the modified scores and the relative contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle indicated a similar tendency for medical‐grade LCDs. On the other hand, the two results did not correspond well for the general‐purpose LCD. The difference between the results obtained at 0 and 327 lux was 0.11 at a maximum for all LCDs used in this study. Conclusions: The evaluation method with the ANG test pattern is considered to be useful for evaluation of the angular performance for medical‐grade LCDs taking ambient‐light conditions into consideration.

AB - Purpose: A simple method with the ANG test pattern to evaluate the angular performance of medical‐grade liquid‐crystal display (LCD) monitors was proposed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in December 2009 (IEC 62563‐1). The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between the results obtained by using the ANG test pattern and the angular performance measured by a luminance meter. We also examined the effect of ambient‐light conditions on the results evaluated by using the ANG test pattern. Methods: Three LCDs, a medical‐grade monochrome LCD (Radiforce GS220, 500 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), a medical‐grade color LCD (Radiforce RX211, 300 cd/m2, Eizo Nanao), and a general‐purpose LCD (SyncMaster940B, 180 cd/m2, Samsung) were used in this study. The ANG test pattern was observed by eight observers under three ambient‐light conditions (0, 35, and 327 lux). Two different scoring methods were used. One is the method proposed by the IEC 62563‐1, and the other is the method modified for comparison of results measured by a luminance meter. The luminance performance was measured as a function of viewing angle, and evaluated as the relative contrast ratio. Finally, the results in terms of the modified scores were compared to the luminance performance in various viewing angles. Results: Variations of the modified scores and the relative contrast ratio as a function of viewing angle indicated a similar tendency for medical‐grade LCDs. On the other hand, the two results did not correspond well for the general‐purpose LCD. The difference between the results obtained at 0 and 327 lux was 0.11 at a maximum for all LCDs used in this study. Conclusions: The evaluation method with the ANG test pattern is considered to be useful for evaluation of the angular performance for medical‐grade LCDs taking ambient‐light conditions into consideration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024793228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024793228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3611616

DO - 10.1118/1.3611616

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024793228

VL - 38

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -