SU‐GG‐T‐257: Modeling of Beam Profiles Based On Three Gaussian Functions in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Acceptance Test of Radiotherapy Planning System

S. Anai, Hidetaka Arimura, F. Araki, M. Tachibana, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Hiroshi Honda, K. Nakamura, Y. Onizuka, H. Terashima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate beam profiles in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for acceptance test of radiotherapy planning system (RTP) system. The beam profiles measured by an ionization chamber were approximated by using three Gaussian functions, and compared with profile data calculated by two RTP systems. Method and Materials: X‐ray linear accelerator with 4,6,10MV (Varian 21EX) was used to deliver symmetric beam profile for a field size of 5×5cm2. A lung phantom consisted of a lung equivalent material (thickness : 170 mm) sandwiched by two Solid Waters, whose thickness were 30 mm and 50 mm for anterior and posterior sides, respectively. Measured beam profiles were approximated by manually determining three amplitudes and standard deviations of three Gaussian functions corresponding to three point spread functions of an x‐ray focus, x‐ray or electron scatter, and a detector,and by integrating the composed function. Finally, we evaluated our method by comparing the approximated beam profiles with those calculated by two algorithms in two RTP systems, i.e., Convolution/superposition (CS) (Philips Pinnacle) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) (Varian Eclipse). Results: Difference between the measured and approximated beam profiles were 4% at 20–80% doses, and 1.5% difference at the other doses. The fringe values (distance between the 50 and 90% levels) of beam profiles approximated by Gaussian functions and calculated by CS and AAA algorithms were 4.7, 6.1, 6.4 mm for 4MV x‐ray, 5.7, 6.9, 7.1 mm for 6MV x‐ray, and 6.8, 7.7, 8.2 mm for 10MV x‐ray, respectively. Conclusion: It was suggested the beam profile model based on the three Gaussian functions may be useful for acceptance test of a RTP system.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Radiosurgery
Radiotherapy
X-Rays
Lung
Particle Accelerators
Electrons
Water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐T‐257 : Modeling of Beam Profiles Based On Three Gaussian Functions in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Acceptance Test of Radiotherapy Planning System. / Anai, S.; Arimura, Hidetaka; Araki, F.; Tachibana, M.; Shioyama, Yoshiyuki; Honda, Hiroshi; Nakamura, K.; Onizuka, Y.; Terashima, H.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 01.01.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee7adbcf9bac491fafa6b542cb9962e1,
title = "SU‐GG‐T‐257: Modeling of Beam Profiles Based On Three Gaussian Functions in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Acceptance Test of Radiotherapy Planning System",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate beam profiles in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for acceptance test of radiotherapy planning system (RTP) system. The beam profiles measured by an ionization chamber were approximated by using three Gaussian functions, and compared with profile data calculated by two RTP systems. Method and Materials: X‐ray linear accelerator with 4,6,10MV (Varian 21EX) was used to deliver symmetric beam profile for a field size of 5×5cm2. A lung phantom consisted of a lung equivalent material (thickness : 170 mm) sandwiched by two Solid Waters, whose thickness were 30 mm and 50 mm for anterior and posterior sides, respectively. Measured beam profiles were approximated by manually determining three amplitudes and standard deviations of three Gaussian functions corresponding to three point spread functions of an x‐ray focus, x‐ray or electron scatter, and a detector,and by integrating the composed function. Finally, we evaluated our method by comparing the approximated beam profiles with those calculated by two algorithms in two RTP systems, i.e., Convolution/superposition (CS) (Philips Pinnacle) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) (Varian Eclipse). Results: Difference between the measured and approximated beam profiles were 4{\%} at 20–80{\%} doses, and 1.5{\%} difference at the other doses. The fringe values (distance between the 50 and 90{\%} levels) of beam profiles approximated by Gaussian functions and calculated by CS and AAA algorithms were 4.7, 6.1, 6.4 mm for 4MV x‐ray, 5.7, 6.9, 7.1 mm for 6MV x‐ray, and 6.8, 7.7, 8.2 mm for 10MV x‐ray, respectively. Conclusion: It was suggested the beam profile model based on the three Gaussian functions may be useful for acceptance test of a RTP system.",
author = "S. Anai and Hidetaka Arimura and F. Araki and M. Tachibana and Yoshiyuki Shioyama and Hiroshi Honda and K. Nakamura and Y. Onizuka and H. Terashima",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.2962009",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐T‐257

T2 - Modeling of Beam Profiles Based On Three Gaussian Functions in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Acceptance Test of Radiotherapy Planning System

AU - Anai, S.

AU - Arimura, Hidetaka

AU - Araki, F.

AU - Tachibana, M.

AU - Shioyama, Yoshiyuki

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

AU - Nakamura, K.

AU - Onizuka, Y.

AU - Terashima, H.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate beam profiles in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for acceptance test of radiotherapy planning system (RTP) system. The beam profiles measured by an ionization chamber were approximated by using three Gaussian functions, and compared with profile data calculated by two RTP systems. Method and Materials: X‐ray linear accelerator with 4,6,10MV (Varian 21EX) was used to deliver symmetric beam profile for a field size of 5×5cm2. A lung phantom consisted of a lung equivalent material (thickness : 170 mm) sandwiched by two Solid Waters, whose thickness were 30 mm and 50 mm for anterior and posterior sides, respectively. Measured beam profiles were approximated by manually determining three amplitudes and standard deviations of three Gaussian functions corresponding to three point spread functions of an x‐ray focus, x‐ray or electron scatter, and a detector,and by integrating the composed function. Finally, we evaluated our method by comparing the approximated beam profiles with those calculated by two algorithms in two RTP systems, i.e., Convolution/superposition (CS) (Philips Pinnacle) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) (Varian Eclipse). Results: Difference between the measured and approximated beam profiles were 4% at 20–80% doses, and 1.5% difference at the other doses. The fringe values (distance between the 50 and 90% levels) of beam profiles approximated by Gaussian functions and calculated by CS and AAA algorithms were 4.7, 6.1, 6.4 mm for 4MV x‐ray, 5.7, 6.9, 7.1 mm for 6MV x‐ray, and 6.8, 7.7, 8.2 mm for 10MV x‐ray, respectively. Conclusion: It was suggested the beam profile model based on the three Gaussian functions may be useful for acceptance test of a RTP system.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate beam profiles in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for acceptance test of radiotherapy planning system (RTP) system. The beam profiles measured by an ionization chamber were approximated by using three Gaussian functions, and compared with profile data calculated by two RTP systems. Method and Materials: X‐ray linear accelerator with 4,6,10MV (Varian 21EX) was used to deliver symmetric beam profile for a field size of 5×5cm2. A lung phantom consisted of a lung equivalent material (thickness : 170 mm) sandwiched by two Solid Waters, whose thickness were 30 mm and 50 mm for anterior and posterior sides, respectively. Measured beam profiles were approximated by manually determining three amplitudes and standard deviations of three Gaussian functions corresponding to three point spread functions of an x‐ray focus, x‐ray or electron scatter, and a detector,and by integrating the composed function. Finally, we evaluated our method by comparing the approximated beam profiles with those calculated by two algorithms in two RTP systems, i.e., Convolution/superposition (CS) (Philips Pinnacle) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) (Varian Eclipse). Results: Difference between the measured and approximated beam profiles were 4% at 20–80% doses, and 1.5% difference at the other doses. The fringe values (distance between the 50 and 90% levels) of beam profiles approximated by Gaussian functions and calculated by CS and AAA algorithms were 4.7, 6.1, 6.4 mm for 4MV x‐ray, 5.7, 6.9, 7.1 mm for 6MV x‐ray, and 6.8, 7.7, 8.2 mm for 10MV x‐ray, respectively. Conclusion: It was suggested the beam profile model based on the three Gaussian functions may be useful for acceptance test of a RTP system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024784222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024784222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2962009

DO - 10.1118/1.2962009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024784222

VL - 35

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -