Temperature distribution estimation in a Dwight-Lloyd Sinter machine based on the combustion rate of Charcoal Quasi-particles

Ziming Wang, Ko Ichiro Ohno, Shunsuke Nonaka, Takayuki Maeda, Kazuya Kunitomo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The coke combustion rate in an iron ore sintering process is one of the most important determining factors of quality and productivity. Biomass carbon material is considered to be a coke substitute with a lower CO2 emission in the sintering process. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combustion rate of a biomass carbon material and to use a sintering simulation model to calculate its temperature profile. The samples were prepared using alumina powder and woody biomass powder. To simplify the experimental conditions, alumina powder, which cannot be reduced, was prepared as a substitute of iron ore. Combustion experiments were carried out in the open at 1073 K~1523 K. The results show that the combustion rates of the biomass carbon material were higher than that of coke. The results were analyzed using an unreacted core model with one reaction interface. The kinetic analysis found that the kc of charcoal was higher than that of coke. It is believed that the larger surface area of charcoal may affect its combustion rate. The analysis of the sintering simulation results shows that the high temperature range of charcoal was smaller than that of coke because of charcoal's low fixed carbon content and density.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number406
    JournalProcesses
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2020

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
    • Process Chemistry and Technology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Temperature distribution estimation in a Dwight-Lloyd Sinter machine based on the combustion rate of Charcoal Quasi-particles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this