Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data

Andrew J. Heymsfield, Alain Protat, Richard T. Austin, Dominique Bouniol, Robin J. Hogan, Julien Delanoe, Hajime Okamoto, Kaori Sato, Gerd Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Zhien Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vertical profiles of ice water content (IWC) can now be derived globally from spaceborne cloud satellite radar (CloudSat) data. Integrating these data with Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data may further increase accuracy. Evaluations of the accuracy of IWC retrieved from radar alone and together with other measurements are now essential. A forward model employing aircraft Lagrangian spiral descents through mid- and low-latitude ice clouds is used to estimate profiles of what a lidar and conventional and Doppler radar would sense. Radar reflectivity Ze and Doppler fall speed at multiple wavelengths and extinction in visible wavelengths were derived from particle size distributions and shape data, constrained by IWC that were measured directly in most instances. These data were provided to eight teams that together cover 10 retrieval methods. Almost 3400 vertically distributed points from 19 clouds were used. Approximate cloud optical depths ranged from below 1 to more than 50. The teams returned retrieval IWC profiles that were evaluated in seven different ways to identify the amount and sources of errors. The mean (median) ratio of the retrieved-to-measured IWC was 1.15 (1.03) ± 0.66 for all teams, 1.08 (1.00) ± 0.60 for those employing a lidar-radar approach, and 1.27 (1.12) ± 0.78 for the standard CloudSat radar-visible optical depth algorithm for Ze > -28 dBZe. The ratios for the groups employing the lidar-radar approach and the radar-visible optical depth algorithm may be lower by as much as 25% because of uncertainties in the extinction in small ice particles provided to the groups. Retrievals from future spaceborne radar using reftectivity-Doppler fall speeds show considerable promise. A lidarradar approach, as applied to measurements from CALIPSO and CloudSat, is useful only in a narrow range of ice water paths (IWP) (40 < IWP < 100 g m-2). Because of the use of the Rayleigh approximation at high reflectivities in some of the algorithms and differences in the way nonspherical particles and Mie effects are considered, IWC retrievals in regions of radar reflectivity at 94 GHz exceeding about 5 dBZe are subject to uncertainties of ± 50%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-163
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

water content
radar
ice
lidar
reflectivity
optical depth
CALIPSO
in situ
method
extinction
wavelength
Doppler radar
vertical profile
aircraft
particle size
water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Heymsfield, A. J., Protat, A., Austin, R. T., Bouniol, D., Hogan, R. J., Delanoe, J., ... Wang, Z. (2008). Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1

Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data. / Heymsfield, Andrew J.; Protat, Alain; Austin, Richard T.; Bouniol, Dominique; Hogan, Robin J.; Delanoe, Julien; Okamoto, Hajime; Sato, Kaori; van Zadelhoff, Gerd Jan; Donovan, David P.; Wang, Zhien.

In: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 135-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heymsfield, AJ, Protat, A, Austin, RT, Bouniol, D, Hogan, RJ, Delanoe, J, Okamoto, H, Sato, K, van Zadelhoff, GJ, Donovan, DP & Wang, Z 2008, 'Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data', Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1
Heymsfield, Andrew J. ; Protat, Alain ; Austin, Richard T. ; Bouniol, Dominique ; Hogan, Robin J. ; Delanoe, Julien ; Okamoto, Hajime ; Sato, Kaori ; van Zadelhoff, Gerd Jan ; Donovan, David P. ; Wang, Zhien. / Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data. In: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 2008 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 135-163.
@article{044c156f861343b0bc61e26678edc206,
title = "Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data",
abstract = "Vertical profiles of ice water content (IWC) can now be derived globally from spaceborne cloud satellite radar (CloudSat) data. Integrating these data with Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data may further increase accuracy. Evaluations of the accuracy of IWC retrieved from radar alone and together with other measurements are now essential. A forward model employing aircraft Lagrangian spiral descents through mid- and low-latitude ice clouds is used to estimate profiles of what a lidar and conventional and Doppler radar would sense. Radar reflectivity Ze and Doppler fall speed at multiple wavelengths and extinction in visible wavelengths were derived from particle size distributions and shape data, constrained by IWC that were measured directly in most instances. These data were provided to eight teams that together cover 10 retrieval methods. Almost 3400 vertically distributed points from 19 clouds were used. Approximate cloud optical depths ranged from below 1 to more than 50. The teams returned retrieval IWC profiles that were evaluated in seven different ways to identify the amount and sources of errors. The mean (median) ratio of the retrieved-to-measured IWC was 1.15 (1.03) ± 0.66 for all teams, 1.08 (1.00) ± 0.60 for those employing a lidar-radar approach, and 1.27 (1.12) ± 0.78 for the standard CloudSat radar-visible optical depth algorithm for Ze > -28 dBZe. The ratios for the groups employing the lidar-radar approach and the radar-visible optical depth algorithm may be lower by as much as 25{\%} because of uncertainties in the extinction in small ice particles provided to the groups. Retrievals from future spaceborne radar using reftectivity-Doppler fall speeds show considerable promise. A lidarradar approach, as applied to measurements from CALIPSO and CloudSat, is useful only in a narrow range of ice water paths (IWP) (40 < IWP < 100 g m-2). Because of the use of the Rayleigh approximation at high reflectivities in some of the algorithms and differences in the way nonspherical particles and Mie effects are considered, IWC retrievals in regions of radar reflectivity at 94 GHz exceeding about 5 dBZe are subject to uncertainties of ± 50{\%}.",
author = "Heymsfield, {Andrew J.} and Alain Protat and Austin, {Richard T.} and Dominique Bouniol and Hogan, {Robin J.} and Julien Delanoe and Hajime Okamoto and Kaori Sato and {van Zadelhoff}, {Gerd Jan} and Donovan, {David P.} and Zhien Wang",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "135--163",
journal = "Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology",
issn = "1558-8424",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing IWC retrieval methods using radar and ancillary measurements with in situ data

AU - Heymsfield, Andrew J.

AU - Protat, Alain

AU - Austin, Richard T.

AU - Bouniol, Dominique

AU - Hogan, Robin J.

AU - Delanoe, Julien

AU - Okamoto, Hajime

AU - Sato, Kaori

AU - van Zadelhoff, Gerd Jan

AU - Donovan, David P.

AU - Wang, Zhien

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Vertical profiles of ice water content (IWC) can now be derived globally from spaceborne cloud satellite radar (CloudSat) data. Integrating these data with Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data may further increase accuracy. Evaluations of the accuracy of IWC retrieved from radar alone and together with other measurements are now essential. A forward model employing aircraft Lagrangian spiral descents through mid- and low-latitude ice clouds is used to estimate profiles of what a lidar and conventional and Doppler radar would sense. Radar reflectivity Ze and Doppler fall speed at multiple wavelengths and extinction in visible wavelengths were derived from particle size distributions and shape data, constrained by IWC that were measured directly in most instances. These data were provided to eight teams that together cover 10 retrieval methods. Almost 3400 vertically distributed points from 19 clouds were used. Approximate cloud optical depths ranged from below 1 to more than 50. The teams returned retrieval IWC profiles that were evaluated in seven different ways to identify the amount and sources of errors. The mean (median) ratio of the retrieved-to-measured IWC was 1.15 (1.03) ± 0.66 for all teams, 1.08 (1.00) ± 0.60 for those employing a lidar-radar approach, and 1.27 (1.12) ± 0.78 for the standard CloudSat radar-visible optical depth algorithm for Ze > -28 dBZe. The ratios for the groups employing the lidar-radar approach and the radar-visible optical depth algorithm may be lower by as much as 25% because of uncertainties in the extinction in small ice particles provided to the groups. Retrievals from future spaceborne radar using reftectivity-Doppler fall speeds show considerable promise. A lidarradar approach, as applied to measurements from CALIPSO and CloudSat, is useful only in a narrow range of ice water paths (IWP) (40 < IWP < 100 g m-2). Because of the use of the Rayleigh approximation at high reflectivities in some of the algorithms and differences in the way nonspherical particles and Mie effects are considered, IWC retrievals in regions of radar reflectivity at 94 GHz exceeding about 5 dBZe are subject to uncertainties of ± 50%.

AB - Vertical profiles of ice water content (IWC) can now be derived globally from spaceborne cloud satellite radar (CloudSat) data. Integrating these data with Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data may further increase accuracy. Evaluations of the accuracy of IWC retrieved from radar alone and together with other measurements are now essential. A forward model employing aircraft Lagrangian spiral descents through mid- and low-latitude ice clouds is used to estimate profiles of what a lidar and conventional and Doppler radar would sense. Radar reflectivity Ze and Doppler fall speed at multiple wavelengths and extinction in visible wavelengths were derived from particle size distributions and shape data, constrained by IWC that were measured directly in most instances. These data were provided to eight teams that together cover 10 retrieval methods. Almost 3400 vertically distributed points from 19 clouds were used. Approximate cloud optical depths ranged from below 1 to more than 50. The teams returned retrieval IWC profiles that were evaluated in seven different ways to identify the amount and sources of errors. The mean (median) ratio of the retrieved-to-measured IWC was 1.15 (1.03) ± 0.66 for all teams, 1.08 (1.00) ± 0.60 for those employing a lidar-radar approach, and 1.27 (1.12) ± 0.78 for the standard CloudSat radar-visible optical depth algorithm for Ze > -28 dBZe. The ratios for the groups employing the lidar-radar approach and the radar-visible optical depth algorithm may be lower by as much as 25% because of uncertainties in the extinction in small ice particles provided to the groups. Retrievals from future spaceborne radar using reftectivity-Doppler fall speeds show considerable promise. A lidarradar approach, as applied to measurements from CALIPSO and CloudSat, is useful only in a narrow range of ice water paths (IWP) (40 < IWP < 100 g m-2). Because of the use of the Rayleigh approximation at high reflectivities in some of the algorithms and differences in the way nonspherical particles and Mie effects are considered, IWC retrievals in regions of radar reflectivity at 94 GHz exceeding about 5 dBZe are subject to uncertainties of ± 50%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40449124775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40449124775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1

DO - 10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:40449124775

VL - 47

SP - 135

EP - 163

JO - Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

JF - Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

SN - 1558-8424

IS - 1

ER -