Peer review remains one of the most important service activities for scientists. Through the time-consuming process of peer review, community volunteers set the bar for the quality of science that is shared with each other and with the world. Attentive, patient, and critical review is required to maintain rigorous and accurate scientific reporting. Reviewers donate their time and effort with little incentive outside of the knowledge that they are contributing to sustain scientific rigor. Space Weather is fortunate to be able to continually rely on our reviewers to maintain a journal that receives and publishes high-quality, high-impact articles. We recognize the time, effort, and dedication each review requires. For this, we extend a heartfelt thank you to all of our 2018 reviewers. We sincerely appreciate your choice to respond positively to our review requests. Last year, Space Weather received 785 peer reviews from 354 individuals. The reviewers who contributed three or more reviews are recognized in italics below. Thank you all for your contributions in 2018.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Atmospheric Science