The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury

Warren R. Dunn, Leonard Lyman Stephen, Andrew E. Lincoln, Paul J. Amoroso, Thomas Wickiewicz, Robert G. Marx

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although there is evidence that very active, young patients are better served with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a lack of objective data demonstrating that future knee injury is prevented by these procedures. Hypothesis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protects against reinjury of the knee that would require reoperation. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A cohort of 6576 active-duty army personnel who had been hospitalized for anterior cruciate ligament injury from 1990 to 1996 were identified. Using the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database, the authors followed these individuals for up to 9 years and collected clinical, demographic, and occupational data. These data were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable analyses to determine the effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the rate of knee reinjury that required operation. Results: Of the 6576 study subjects, 3795 subjects (58%) underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 2781 (42%) did not. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower among the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group (4.90/100 person-years) compared with those treated conservatively (13.86/100 person-years; P < .0001). Proportional hazard regression analyses adjusted for age, race, sex, marital status, education, and physical activity level confirmed that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was protective against meniscal and cartilage reinjury (P < .0001). Secondary medial meniscal injury was more common than secondary lateral meniscal injury (P < .003). Younger age was the strongest predictor of failure of conservative management leading to late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P < .0001). Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protected against reoperation in this young, active population; younger subjects were more likely to require late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Strong consideration should be given to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after anterior cruciate ligament injury in young, active individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1906-1914
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Knee
Reoperation
Wounds and Injuries
Knee Injuries
Military Personnel
Marital Status
Cartilage
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Demography
Databases
Exercise
Education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury. / Dunn, Warren R.; Lyman Stephen, Leonard; Lincoln, Andrew E.; Amoroso, Paul J.; Wickiewicz, Thomas; Marx, Robert G.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 8, 01.12.2004, p. 1906-1914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunn, Warren R. ; Lyman Stephen, Leonard ; Lincoln, Andrew E. ; Amoroso, Paul J. ; Wickiewicz, Thomas ; Marx, Robert G. / The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 1906-1914.
@article{41bbe18d546f4a0e87ab6463b9e040b1,
title = "The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury",
abstract = "Background: Although there is evidence that very active, young patients are better served with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a lack of objective data demonstrating that future knee injury is prevented by these procedures. Hypothesis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protects against reinjury of the knee that would require reoperation. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A cohort of 6576 active-duty army personnel who had been hospitalized for anterior cruciate ligament injury from 1990 to 1996 were identified. Using the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database, the authors followed these individuals for up to 9 years and collected clinical, demographic, and occupational data. These data were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable analyses to determine the effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the rate of knee reinjury that required operation. Results: Of the 6576 study subjects, 3795 subjects (58{\%}) underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 2781 (42{\%}) did not. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower among the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group (4.90/100 person-years) compared with those treated conservatively (13.86/100 person-years; P < .0001). Proportional hazard regression analyses adjusted for age, race, sex, marital status, education, and physical activity level confirmed that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was protective against meniscal and cartilage reinjury (P < .0001). Secondary medial meniscal injury was more common than secondary lateral meniscal injury (P < .003). Younger age was the strongest predictor of failure of conservative management leading to late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P < .0001). Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protected against reoperation in this young, active population; younger subjects were more likely to require late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Strong consideration should be given to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after anterior cruciate ligament injury in young, active individuals.",
author = "Dunn, {Warren R.} and {Lyman Stephen}, Leonard and Lincoln, {Andrew E.} and Amoroso, {Paul J.} and Thomas Wickiewicz and Marx, {Robert G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0363546504265006",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1906--1914",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury

AU - Dunn, Warren R.

AU - Lyman Stephen, Leonard

AU - Lincoln, Andrew E.

AU - Amoroso, Paul J.

AU - Wickiewicz, Thomas

AU - Marx, Robert G.

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Background: Although there is evidence that very active, young patients are better served with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a lack of objective data demonstrating that future knee injury is prevented by these procedures. Hypothesis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protects against reinjury of the knee that would require reoperation. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A cohort of 6576 active-duty army personnel who had been hospitalized for anterior cruciate ligament injury from 1990 to 1996 were identified. Using the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database, the authors followed these individuals for up to 9 years and collected clinical, demographic, and occupational data. These data were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable analyses to determine the effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the rate of knee reinjury that required operation. Results: Of the 6576 study subjects, 3795 subjects (58%) underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 2781 (42%) did not. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower among the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group (4.90/100 person-years) compared with those treated conservatively (13.86/100 person-years; P < .0001). Proportional hazard regression analyses adjusted for age, race, sex, marital status, education, and physical activity level confirmed that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was protective against meniscal and cartilage reinjury (P < .0001). Secondary medial meniscal injury was more common than secondary lateral meniscal injury (P < .003). Younger age was the strongest predictor of failure of conservative management leading to late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P < .0001). Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protected against reoperation in this young, active population; younger subjects were more likely to require late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Strong consideration should be given to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after anterior cruciate ligament injury in young, active individuals.

AB - Background: Although there is evidence that very active, young patients are better served with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a lack of objective data demonstrating that future knee injury is prevented by these procedures. Hypothesis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protects against reinjury of the knee that would require reoperation. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A cohort of 6576 active-duty army personnel who had been hospitalized for anterior cruciate ligament injury from 1990 to 1996 were identified. Using the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database, the authors followed these individuals for up to 9 years and collected clinical, demographic, and occupational data. These data were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable analyses to determine the effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the rate of knee reinjury that required operation. Results: Of the 6576 study subjects, 3795 subjects (58%) underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 2781 (42%) did not. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower among the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group (4.90/100 person-years) compared with those treated conservatively (13.86/100 person-years; P < .0001). Proportional hazard regression analyses adjusted for age, race, sex, marital status, education, and physical activity level confirmed that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was protective against meniscal and cartilage reinjury (P < .0001). Secondary medial meniscal injury was more common than secondary lateral meniscal injury (P < .003). Younger age was the strongest predictor of failure of conservative management leading to late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P < .0001). Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protected against reoperation in this young, active population; younger subjects were more likely to require late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Strong consideration should be given to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after anterior cruciate ligament injury in young, active individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9244248181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9244248181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546504265006

DO - 10.1177/0363546504265006

M3 - Article

C2 - 15572320

AN - SCOPUS:9244248181

VL - 32

SP - 1906

EP - 1914

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 8

ER -