The effect of trade openness on deforestation: empirical analysis for 142 countries

Tetsuya Tsurumi, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores the effect of trade openness on deforestation. Previous studies do not find a clear effect of trade openness on deforestation. We use updated data on the annual rate of deforestation for 142 countries from 1990 to 2003, treat trade and income as endogenous, and take into consideration an adjustment process by applying a dynamic model. We find that an increase in trade openness increases deforestation for non-OECD countries while slowing down deforestation for OECD countries. There is a possibility that both capital–labor and environmental-regulation effects have a negative impact on deforestation in developing countries, whereas the opposite holds in developed countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-324
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Economics and Policy Studies
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 4 2014

Fingerprint

empirical analysis
deforestation
OECD
trade openness
effect
Empirical analysis
Trade openness
Deforestation
developing world
income

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The effect of trade openness on deforestation : empirical analysis for 142 countries. / Tsurumi, Tetsuya; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 04.10.2014, p. 305-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94eb1ca366c948ef9b2832d920f7b30c,
title = "The effect of trade openness on deforestation: empirical analysis for 142 countries",
abstract = "This study explores the effect of trade openness on deforestation. Previous studies do not find a clear effect of trade openness on deforestation. We use updated data on the annual rate of deforestation for 142 countries from 1990 to 2003, treat trade and income as endogenous, and take into consideration an adjustment process by applying a dynamic model. We find that an increase in trade openness increases deforestation for non-OECD countries while slowing down deforestation for OECD countries. There is a possibility that both capital–labor and environmental-regulation effects have a negative impact on deforestation in developing countries, whereas the opposite holds in developed countries.",
author = "Tetsuya Tsurumi and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10018-012-0051-5",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "305--324",
journal = "Environmental Economics and Policy Studies",
issn = "1432-847X",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of trade openness on deforestation

T2 - empirical analysis for 142 countries

AU - Tsurumi, Tetsuya

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2014/10/4

Y1 - 2014/10/4

N2 - This study explores the effect of trade openness on deforestation. Previous studies do not find a clear effect of trade openness on deforestation. We use updated data on the annual rate of deforestation for 142 countries from 1990 to 2003, treat trade and income as endogenous, and take into consideration an adjustment process by applying a dynamic model. We find that an increase in trade openness increases deforestation for non-OECD countries while slowing down deforestation for OECD countries. There is a possibility that both capital–labor and environmental-regulation effects have a negative impact on deforestation in developing countries, whereas the opposite holds in developed countries.

AB - This study explores the effect of trade openness on deforestation. Previous studies do not find a clear effect of trade openness on deforestation. We use updated data on the annual rate of deforestation for 142 countries from 1990 to 2003, treat trade and income as endogenous, and take into consideration an adjustment process by applying a dynamic model. We find that an increase in trade openness increases deforestation for non-OECD countries while slowing down deforestation for OECD countries. There is a possibility that both capital–labor and environmental-regulation effects have a negative impact on deforestation in developing countries, whereas the opposite holds in developed countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908556981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908556981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10018-012-0051-5

DO - 10.1007/s10018-012-0051-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908556981

VL - 16

SP - 305

EP - 324

JO - Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

JF - Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

SN - 1432-847X

IS - 4

ER -