The household as a node of communal collaboration between settlements and tension within settlements: A case study from the yayoi period in Northern Kyushu (Japan)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reveals that the household does not appear to have been the unit in which the inheritance of commodities and rights, both symbolic and allocative, occurred, at least not during the Yayoi period on the Japanese archipelago when hierarchy was developing. Instead, the grouping which in this paper is called the basic unit-consisting of around five houses with a shared cluster of storage facilities and a burial ground-functioned in this fashion throughout the period. When social differentiation began in the Late Yayoi period, what became hierarchically situated were not households but these larger units of five or so households probably consisting of siblings, their spouses, and children. The lack of significant evidence of a fixed chiefly position in a particular household over a number of generations suggests that this larger grouping, with its archaeologically recognizable cluster of houses and probably representing a clan segment (i.e., lineage), functioned as a stable pool of candidates for the position of the "chief" of a clan. The development of a social hierarchy based upon a clan-segment rather than a household-based social grouping may have preserved a sense of communal togetherness and equality and enabled the moblization of labor, two characteristics of the classic Asiatic mode of production and state formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-177
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Anthropological Research
Volume72
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

grouping
Japan
Asiatic mode of production
social differentiation
state formation
spouse
funeral
commodity
equality
candidacy
labor
lack
evidence
Household
Yayoi
Grouping
Clan

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{614f69c6db7d4a6580a458793b598ae4,
title = "The household as a node of communal collaboration between settlements and tension within settlements: A case study from the yayoi period in Northern Kyushu (Japan)",
abstract = "This paper reveals that the household does not appear to have been the unit in which the inheritance of commodities and rights, both symbolic and allocative, occurred, at least not during the Yayoi period on the Japanese archipelago when hierarchy was developing. Instead, the grouping which in this paper is called the basic unit-consisting of around five houses with a shared cluster of storage facilities and a burial ground-functioned in this fashion throughout the period. When social differentiation began in the Late Yayoi period, what became hierarchically situated were not households but these larger units of five or so households probably consisting of siblings, their spouses, and children. The lack of significant evidence of a fixed chiefly position in a particular household over a number of generations suggests that this larger grouping, with its archaeologically recognizable cluster of houses and probably representing a clan segment (i.e., lineage), functioned as a stable pool of candidates for the position of the {"}chief{"} of a clan. The development of a social hierarchy based upon a clan-segment rather than a household-based social grouping may have preserved a sense of communal togetherness and equality and enabled the moblization of labor, two characteristics of the classic Asiatic mode of production and state formation.",
author = "Koji Mizoguchi",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/686558",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "158--177",
journal = "Journal of Anthropological Research",
issn = "0091-7710",
publisher = "University of New Mexico",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The household as a node of communal collaboration between settlements and tension within settlements

T2 - A case study from the yayoi period in Northern Kyushu (Japan)

AU - Mizoguchi, Koji

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - This paper reveals that the household does not appear to have been the unit in which the inheritance of commodities and rights, both symbolic and allocative, occurred, at least not during the Yayoi period on the Japanese archipelago when hierarchy was developing. Instead, the grouping which in this paper is called the basic unit-consisting of around five houses with a shared cluster of storage facilities and a burial ground-functioned in this fashion throughout the period. When social differentiation began in the Late Yayoi period, what became hierarchically situated were not households but these larger units of five or so households probably consisting of siblings, their spouses, and children. The lack of significant evidence of a fixed chiefly position in a particular household over a number of generations suggests that this larger grouping, with its archaeologically recognizable cluster of houses and probably representing a clan segment (i.e., lineage), functioned as a stable pool of candidates for the position of the "chief" of a clan. The development of a social hierarchy based upon a clan-segment rather than a household-based social grouping may have preserved a sense of communal togetherness and equality and enabled the moblization of labor, two characteristics of the classic Asiatic mode of production and state formation.

AB - This paper reveals that the household does not appear to have been the unit in which the inheritance of commodities and rights, both symbolic and allocative, occurred, at least not during the Yayoi period on the Japanese archipelago when hierarchy was developing. Instead, the grouping which in this paper is called the basic unit-consisting of around five houses with a shared cluster of storage facilities and a burial ground-functioned in this fashion throughout the period. When social differentiation began in the Late Yayoi period, what became hierarchically situated were not households but these larger units of five or so households probably consisting of siblings, their spouses, and children. The lack of significant evidence of a fixed chiefly position in a particular household over a number of generations suggests that this larger grouping, with its archaeologically recognizable cluster of houses and probably representing a clan segment (i.e., lineage), functioned as a stable pool of candidates for the position of the "chief" of a clan. The development of a social hierarchy based upon a clan-segment rather than a household-based social grouping may have preserved a sense of communal togetherness and equality and enabled the moblization of labor, two characteristics of the classic Asiatic mode of production and state formation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971014048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971014048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/686558

DO - 10.1086/686558

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84971014048

VL - 72

SP - 158

EP - 177

JO - Journal of Anthropological Research

JF - Journal of Anthropological Research

SN - 0091-7710

IS - 2

ER -