The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders

Mauricio Tohen, Ellen Frank, Charles L. Bowden, Francesc Colom, S. Nassir Ghaemi, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Gin S. Malhi, Joseph R. Calabrese, Willem A. Nolen, Eduard Vieta, Flávio Kapczinski, Guy M. Goodwin, Trisha Suppes, Gary S. Sachs, K. N.Roy Chengappa, Heinz Grunze, Philip B. Mitchell, Shigenobu Kanba, Michael Berk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

263 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Via an international panel of experts, this paper attempts to document, review, interpret, and propose operational definitions used to describe the course of bipolar disorders for worldwide use, and to disseminate consensus opinion, supported by the existing literature, in order to better predict course and treatment outcomes. Methods: Under the auspices of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, a task force was convened to examine, report, discuss, and integrate findings from the scientific literature related to observational and clinical trial studies in order to reach consensus and propose terminology describing course and outcome in bipolar disorders. Results: Consensus opinion was reached regarding the definition of nineterms (response, remission, recovery, relapse, recurrence, subsyndromal states, predominant polarity, switch, and functional outcome) commonly used to describe course and outcomes in bipolar disorders. Further studies are needed to validate the proposed definitions. Conclusions: Determination and dissemination of a consensus nomenclature serve as the first step toward producing a validated and standardized system to define course and outcome in bipolar disorders in order to identify predictors of outcome and effects of treatment. The task force acknowledges that there is limited validity to the proposed terms, as for the most part they represent a consensus opinion. These definitions need to be validated in existing databases and in future studies, and the primary goals of the task force are to stimulate research on the validity of proposed concepts and further standardize the technical nomenclature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-473
Number of pages21
JournalBipolar Disorders
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 3 2009

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Bipolar Disorder
Terminology
Consensus
Literature
Recurrence
Clinical Trials
Databases
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders. / Tohen, Mauricio; Frank, Ellen; Bowden, Charles L.; Colom, Francesc; Ghaemi, S. Nassir; Yatham, Lakshmi N.; Malhi, Gin S.; Calabrese, Joseph R.; Nolen, Willem A.; Vieta, Eduard; Kapczinski, Flávio; Goodwin, Guy M.; Suppes, Trisha; Sachs, Gary S.; Chengappa, K. N.Roy; Grunze, Heinz; Mitchell, Philip B.; Kanba, Shigenobu; Berk, Michael.

In: Bipolar Disorders, Vol. 11, No. 5, 03.08.2009, p. 453-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Tohen, M, Frank, E, Bowden, CL, Colom, F, Ghaemi, SN, Yatham, LN, Malhi, GS, Calabrese, JR, Nolen, WA, Vieta, E, Kapczinski, F, Goodwin, GM, Suppes, T, Sachs, GS, Chengappa, KNR, Grunze, H, Mitchell, PB, Kanba, S & Berk, M 2009, 'The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders', Bipolar Disorders, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00726.x
Tohen, Mauricio ; Frank, Ellen ; Bowden, Charles L. ; Colom, Francesc ; Ghaemi, S. Nassir ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Malhi, Gin S. ; Calabrese, Joseph R. ; Nolen, Willem A. ; Vieta, Eduard ; Kapczinski, Flávio ; Goodwin, Guy M. ; Suppes, Trisha ; Sachs, Gary S. ; Chengappa, K. N.Roy ; Grunze, Heinz ; Mitchell, Philip B. ; Kanba, Shigenobu ; Berk, Michael. / The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders. In: Bipolar Disorders. 2009 ; Vol. 11, No. 5. pp. 453-473.
@article{1f8dc8d988494cedbe817e4a1c62b8d9,
title = "The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders",
abstract = "Objectives: Via an international panel of experts, this paper attempts to document, review, interpret, and propose operational definitions used to describe the course of bipolar disorders for worldwide use, and to disseminate consensus opinion, supported by the existing literature, in order to better predict course and treatment outcomes. Methods: Under the auspices of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, a task force was convened to examine, report, discuss, and integrate findings from the scientific literature related to observational and clinical trial studies in order to reach consensus and propose terminology describing course and outcome in bipolar disorders. Results: Consensus opinion was reached regarding the definition of nineterms (response, remission, recovery, relapse, recurrence, subsyndromal states, predominant polarity, switch, and functional outcome) commonly used to describe course and outcomes in bipolar disorders. Further studies are needed to validate the proposed definitions. Conclusions: Determination and dissemination of a consensus nomenclature serve as the first step toward producing a validated and standardized system to define course and outcome in bipolar disorders in order to identify predictors of outcome and effects of treatment. The task force acknowledges that there is limited validity to the proposed terms, as for the most part they represent a consensus opinion. These definitions need to be validated in existing databases and in future studies, and the primary goals of the task force are to stimulate research on the validity of proposed concepts and further standardize the technical nomenclature.",
author = "Mauricio Tohen and Ellen Frank and Bowden, {Charles L.} and Francesc Colom and Ghaemi, {S. Nassir} and Yatham, {Lakshmi N.} and Malhi, {Gin S.} and Calabrese, {Joseph R.} and Nolen, {Willem A.} and Eduard Vieta and Fl{\'a}vio Kapczinski and Goodwin, {Guy M.} and Trisha Suppes and Sachs, {Gary S.} and Chengappa, {K. N.Roy} and Heinz Grunze and Mitchell, {Philip B.} and Shigenobu Kanba and Michael Berk",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00726.x",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "453--473",
journal = "Bipolar Disorders",
issn = "1398-5647",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders

AU - Tohen, Mauricio

AU - Frank, Ellen

AU - Bowden, Charles L.

AU - Colom, Francesc

AU - Ghaemi, S. Nassir

AU - Yatham, Lakshmi N.

AU - Malhi, Gin S.

AU - Calabrese, Joseph R.

AU - Nolen, Willem A.

AU - Vieta, Eduard

AU - Kapczinski, Flávio

AU - Goodwin, Guy M.

AU - Suppes, Trisha

AU - Sachs, Gary S.

AU - Chengappa, K. N.Roy

AU - Grunze, Heinz

AU - Mitchell, Philip B.

AU - Kanba, Shigenobu

AU - Berk, Michael

PY - 2009/8/3

Y1 - 2009/8/3

N2 - Objectives: Via an international panel of experts, this paper attempts to document, review, interpret, and propose operational definitions used to describe the course of bipolar disorders for worldwide use, and to disseminate consensus opinion, supported by the existing literature, in order to better predict course and treatment outcomes. Methods: Under the auspices of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, a task force was convened to examine, report, discuss, and integrate findings from the scientific literature related to observational and clinical trial studies in order to reach consensus and propose terminology describing course and outcome in bipolar disorders. Results: Consensus opinion was reached regarding the definition of nineterms (response, remission, recovery, relapse, recurrence, subsyndromal states, predominant polarity, switch, and functional outcome) commonly used to describe course and outcomes in bipolar disorders. Further studies are needed to validate the proposed definitions. Conclusions: Determination and dissemination of a consensus nomenclature serve as the first step toward producing a validated and standardized system to define course and outcome in bipolar disorders in order to identify predictors of outcome and effects of treatment. The task force acknowledges that there is limited validity to the proposed terms, as for the most part they represent a consensus opinion. These definitions need to be validated in existing databases and in future studies, and the primary goals of the task force are to stimulate research on the validity of proposed concepts and further standardize the technical nomenclature.

AB - Objectives: Via an international panel of experts, this paper attempts to document, review, interpret, and propose operational definitions used to describe the course of bipolar disorders for worldwide use, and to disseminate consensus opinion, supported by the existing literature, in order to better predict course and treatment outcomes. Methods: Under the auspices of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, a task force was convened to examine, report, discuss, and integrate findings from the scientific literature related to observational and clinical trial studies in order to reach consensus and propose terminology describing course and outcome in bipolar disorders. Results: Consensus opinion was reached regarding the definition of nineterms (response, remission, recovery, relapse, recurrence, subsyndromal states, predominant polarity, switch, and functional outcome) commonly used to describe course and outcomes in bipolar disorders. Further studies are needed to validate the proposed definitions. Conclusions: Determination and dissemination of a consensus nomenclature serve as the first step toward producing a validated and standardized system to define course and outcome in bipolar disorders in order to identify predictors of outcome and effects of treatment. The task force acknowledges that there is limited validity to the proposed terms, as for the most part they represent a consensus opinion. These definitions need to be validated in existing databases and in future studies, and the primary goals of the task force are to stimulate research on the validity of proposed concepts and further standardize the technical nomenclature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67749096067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67749096067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00726.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00726.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19624385

AN - SCOPUS:67749096067

VL - 11

SP - 453

EP - 473

JO - Bipolar Disorders

JF - Bipolar Disorders

SN - 1398-5647

IS - 5

ER -