The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern- reversal visual-evoked potentials

S. Kurita-Tashima, S. Tobimatsu, M. Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M. Kato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To demonstrate that the frontal negative potential (N100) does exist in response to pattern-reversal visual stimulation and its independence of the dipole source from the major occipital positive potential (P100), modifications of P100 and N100 with changes in the check size, contrast, and luminance of the stimulus pattern were studied in healthy subjects. Eight different check sizes (10-90 min of arc), eight different contrast levels (10-85%), and six different luminance levels (11-180 cd/m2) were used. Changing the stimulus conditions modified the latencies and amplitudes of P100 and N100 in different ways. P100 latency had a band pass spatial tuning function against check size; N100 latency did not. P100 was sensitive to changes in contrast and luminance; N100 was less dependent on these parameters. These findings suggest the existence of different physiologic properties for N100. Consequently, frontal negativity is considered to be independent of P100.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2423-2428
Number of pages6
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume33
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1992

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern- reversal visual-evoked potentials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kurita-Tashima, S., Tobimatsu, S., Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M., & Kato, M. (1992). The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern- reversal visual-evoked potentials. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33(8), 2423-2428.