The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography

Kazunori Yoshiura, H. Stamatakis, X. Q. Shi, U. Welander, W. D. McDavid, J. Kristoffersen, G. Tronje

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of an additional scintillator layer on the psychophysical properties of a CCD detector for digital dental radiography. Methods: Radiographs of a test object containing ten holes of increasing depth were obtained throughout the exposure range of two CCD detectors at 70 and 90 kVp. One was the original detector for the Sens-A-Ray system (Regam Medical Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden) and the other the same detector covered by a scintillator layer. Ten viewers evaluated the radiographs for the number of perceptible holes. From these data and the dose response functions for the two detectors, the minimum perceptible exposure difference was found. The reciprocal values of this parameter were plotted against the logarithm of exposure to create Perceptibility Curves (PCs). Results: The four PCs had essentially the same shape and height. There was a shift to lower exposures in the PCs for the detector covered by a scintillator. Conclusions: The two detectors have essentially the same psychophysical properties. Since the detector covered by a scintillator layer is more sensitive, it should be preferred for clinical practice since the dose to the patient is reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-135
Number of pages5
JournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Dental Digital Radiography
Sweden

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Yoshiura, K., Stamatakis, H., Shi, X. Q., Welander, U., McDavid, W. D., Kristoffersen, J., & Tronje, G. (1998). The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 27(3), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600332

The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography. / Yoshiura, Kazunori; Stamatakis, H.; Shi, X. Q.; Welander, U.; McDavid, W. D.; Kristoffersen, J.; Tronje, G.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 131-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoshiura, K, Stamatakis, H, Shi, XQ, Welander, U, McDavid, WD, Kristoffersen, J & Tronje, G 1998, 'The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography', Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 131-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600332
Yoshiura K, Stamatakis H, Shi XQ, Welander U, McDavid WD, Kristoffersen J et al. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1998 Jan 1;27(3):131-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600332
Yoshiura, Kazunori ; Stamatakis, H. ; Shi, X. Q. ; Welander, U. ; McDavid, W. D. ; Kristoffersen, J. ; Tronje, G. / The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography. In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1998 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 131-135.
@article{d9d8d3512daa4dae9d80a133f1539aff,
title = "The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the effect of an additional scintillator layer on the psychophysical properties of a CCD detector for digital dental radiography. Methods: Radiographs of a test object containing ten holes of increasing depth were obtained throughout the exposure range of two CCD detectors at 70 and 90 kVp. One was the original detector for the Sens-A-Ray system (Regam Medical Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden) and the other the same detector covered by a scintillator layer. Ten viewers evaluated the radiographs for the number of perceptible holes. From these data and the dose response functions for the two detectors, the minimum perceptible exposure difference was found. The reciprocal values of this parameter were plotted against the logarithm of exposure to create Perceptibility Curves (PCs). Results: The four PCs had essentially the same shape and height. There was a shift to lower exposures in the PCs for the detector covered by a scintillator. Conclusions: The two detectors have essentially the same psychophysical properties. Since the detector covered by a scintillator layer is more sensitive, it should be preferred for clinical practice since the dose to the patient is reduced.",
author = "Kazunori Yoshiura and H. Stamatakis and Shi, {X. Q.} and U. Welander and McDavid, {W. D.} and J. Kristoffersen and G. Tronje",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600332",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "131--135",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography

AU - Yoshiura, Kazunori

AU - Stamatakis, H.

AU - Shi, X. Q.

AU - Welander, U.

AU - McDavid, W. D.

AU - Kristoffersen, J.

AU - Tronje, G.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the effect of an additional scintillator layer on the psychophysical properties of a CCD detector for digital dental radiography. Methods: Radiographs of a test object containing ten holes of increasing depth were obtained throughout the exposure range of two CCD detectors at 70 and 90 kVp. One was the original detector for the Sens-A-Ray system (Regam Medical Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden) and the other the same detector covered by a scintillator layer. Ten viewers evaluated the radiographs for the number of perceptible holes. From these data and the dose response functions for the two detectors, the minimum perceptible exposure difference was found. The reciprocal values of this parameter were plotted against the logarithm of exposure to create Perceptibility Curves (PCs). Results: The four PCs had essentially the same shape and height. There was a shift to lower exposures in the PCs for the detector covered by a scintillator. Conclusions: The two detectors have essentially the same psychophysical properties. Since the detector covered by a scintillator layer is more sensitive, it should be preferred for clinical practice since the dose to the patient is reduced.

AB - Objective: To compare the effect of an additional scintillator layer on the psychophysical properties of a CCD detector for digital dental radiography. Methods: Radiographs of a test object containing ten holes of increasing depth were obtained throughout the exposure range of two CCD detectors at 70 and 90 kVp. One was the original detector for the Sens-A-Ray system (Regam Medical Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden) and the other the same detector covered by a scintillator layer. Ten viewers evaluated the radiographs for the number of perceptible holes. From these data and the dose response functions for the two detectors, the minimum perceptible exposure difference was found. The reciprocal values of this parameter were plotted against the logarithm of exposure to create Perceptibility Curves (PCs). Results: The four PCs had essentially the same shape and height. There was a shift to lower exposures in the PCs for the detector covered by a scintillator. Conclusions: The two detectors have essentially the same psychophysical properties. Since the detector covered by a scintillator layer is more sensitive, it should be preferred for clinical practice since the dose to the patient is reduced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032059073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032059073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600332

DO - 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600332

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 131

EP - 135

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

IS - 3

ER -