The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle inferred from the analysis of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation

Masao Nakada, Chihiro Iriguchi, Shun ichiro Karato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle is inferred from the decay time of the Chandler wobble and semi-diurnal to 18.6 years tidal deformations combined with model viscosity-depth profiles corresponding to a range of temperature-depth models. We use two typical temperature profiles of the D″ layer by considering its dynamic state: (i) bottom thermal boundary layer of the mantle convection (TBL model) and (ii) vigorously small-scale convecting layer (CON model). Three possible models are derived from the comparison between the numerical and observationally inferred decay times of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation. The first and second models are those with a viscosity of ~10 16Pas at the core-mantle boundary. The temperature gradient for the first one, TBL model with a thickness of the D″ layer (L) of ~200km, is nearly constant within the D″ layer. The second one, TBL and CON models with L~300km, requires that the temperature gradient of the lower part (~100km thickness) is larger than that of the upper part. The temperature increases within the D″ layer for these two models are larger than ~1500K. The third model has a constant low viscosity layer (~100km thickness and viscosity smaller than ~10 17Pas) at the bottom of the D″ layer in TBL (L~200 and 300km) and CON (L~300km) models. The temperature increases would be 1000-1600K depending on the viscosity at the top of the D″ layer (10 21-10 22Pas). The heat flows from the core to the mantle for these three models are estimated to be larger than ~5TW. The third model may be preferable after comprehensively taking account of the fitness of the decay time of the Chandler wobble and the tidal deformations for each model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-24
Number of pages14
JournalPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
Volume208-209
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Chandler wobble
D region
Earth mantle
viscosity
mantle
analysis
temperature gradient
temperature gradients
decay
core-mantle boundary
thermal boundary layer
fitness
mantle convection
temperature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Geophysics
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle inferred from the analysis of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation. / Nakada, Masao; Iriguchi, Chihiro; Karato, Shun ichiro.

In: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 208-209, 01.10.2012, p. 11-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34b385970bf64bf4a5955e58e6068f8d,
title = "The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle inferred from the analysis of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation",
abstract = "The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle is inferred from the decay time of the Chandler wobble and semi-diurnal to 18.6 years tidal deformations combined with model viscosity-depth profiles corresponding to a range of temperature-depth models. We use two typical temperature profiles of the D″ layer by considering its dynamic state: (i) bottom thermal boundary layer of the mantle convection (TBL model) and (ii) vigorously small-scale convecting layer (CON model). Three possible models are derived from the comparison between the numerical and observationally inferred decay times of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation. The first and second models are those with a viscosity of ~10 16Pas at the core-mantle boundary. The temperature gradient for the first one, TBL model with a thickness of the D″ layer (L) of ~200km, is nearly constant within the D″ layer. The second one, TBL and CON models with L~300km, requires that the temperature gradient of the lower part (~100km thickness) is larger than that of the upper part. The temperature increases within the D″ layer for these two models are larger than ~1500K. The third model has a constant low viscosity layer (~100km thickness and viscosity smaller than ~10 17Pas) at the bottom of the D″ layer in TBL (L~200 and 300km) and CON (L~300km) models. The temperature increases would be 1000-1600K depending on the viscosity at the top of the D″ layer (10 21-10 22Pas). The heat flows from the core to the mantle for these three models are estimated to be larger than ~5TW. The third model may be preferable after comprehensively taking account of the fitness of the decay time of the Chandler wobble and the tidal deformations for each model.",
author = "Masao Nakada and Chihiro Iriguchi and Karato, {Shun ichiro}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pepi.2012.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "208-209",
pages = "11--24",
journal = "Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors",
issn = "0031-9201",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle inferred from the analysis of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation

AU - Nakada, Masao

AU - Iriguchi, Chihiro

AU - Karato, Shun ichiro

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle is inferred from the decay time of the Chandler wobble and semi-diurnal to 18.6 years tidal deformations combined with model viscosity-depth profiles corresponding to a range of temperature-depth models. We use two typical temperature profiles of the D″ layer by considering its dynamic state: (i) bottom thermal boundary layer of the mantle convection (TBL model) and (ii) vigorously small-scale convecting layer (CON model). Three possible models are derived from the comparison between the numerical and observationally inferred decay times of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation. The first and second models are those with a viscosity of ~10 16Pas at the core-mantle boundary. The temperature gradient for the first one, TBL model with a thickness of the D″ layer (L) of ~200km, is nearly constant within the D″ layer. The second one, TBL and CON models with L~300km, requires that the temperature gradient of the lower part (~100km thickness) is larger than that of the upper part. The temperature increases within the D″ layer for these two models are larger than ~1500K. The third model has a constant low viscosity layer (~100km thickness and viscosity smaller than ~10 17Pas) at the bottom of the D″ layer in TBL (L~200 and 300km) and CON (L~300km) models. The temperature increases would be 1000-1600K depending on the viscosity at the top of the D″ layer (10 21-10 22Pas). The heat flows from the core to the mantle for these three models are estimated to be larger than ~5TW. The third model may be preferable after comprehensively taking account of the fitness of the decay time of the Chandler wobble and the tidal deformations for each model.

AB - The viscosity structure of the D″ layer of the Earth's mantle is inferred from the decay time of the Chandler wobble and semi-diurnal to 18.6 years tidal deformations combined with model viscosity-depth profiles corresponding to a range of temperature-depth models. We use two typical temperature profiles of the D″ layer by considering its dynamic state: (i) bottom thermal boundary layer of the mantle convection (TBL model) and (ii) vigorously small-scale convecting layer (CON model). Three possible models are derived from the comparison between the numerical and observationally inferred decay times of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation. The first and second models are those with a viscosity of ~10 16Pas at the core-mantle boundary. The temperature gradient for the first one, TBL model with a thickness of the D″ layer (L) of ~200km, is nearly constant within the D″ layer. The second one, TBL and CON models with L~300km, requires that the temperature gradient of the lower part (~100km thickness) is larger than that of the upper part. The temperature increases within the D″ layer for these two models are larger than ~1500K. The third model has a constant low viscosity layer (~100km thickness and viscosity smaller than ~10 17Pas) at the bottom of the D″ layer in TBL (L~200 and 300km) and CON (L~300km) models. The temperature increases would be 1000-1600K depending on the viscosity at the top of the D″ layer (10 21-10 22Pas). The heat flows from the core to the mantle for these three models are estimated to be larger than ~5TW. The third model may be preferable after comprehensively taking account of the fitness of the decay time of the Chandler wobble and the tidal deformations for each model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866746042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866746042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pepi.2012.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.pepi.2012.07.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866746042

VL - 208-209

SP - 11

EP - 24

JO - Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

JF - Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

SN - 0031-9201

ER -