Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis

Hiromasa Takahashi, Shigeaki Moriyama, Haruhiko Furuta, Hisao Matsunaga, Yuki Sakamoto, Toshihiro Kikuta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA).Methods: The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads.Results: The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations.Conclusions: The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
JournalHead and Face Medicine
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 26 2010

Fingerprint

Finite Element Analysis
Osteotomy
Mandible
Biomechanical Phenomena
Tooth
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy : Biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis. / Takahashi, Hiromasa; Moriyama, Shigeaki; Furuta, Haruhiko; Matsunaga, Hisao; Sakamoto, Yuki; Kikuta, Toshihiro.

In: Head and Face Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 1, 4, 26.03.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takahashi, Hiromasa ; Moriyama, Shigeaki ; Furuta, Haruhiko ; Matsunaga, Hisao ; Sakamoto, Yuki ; Kikuta, Toshihiro. / Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy : Biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis. In: Head and Face Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 1.
@article{a2301fe78d5d4612acc28f3f55874dd1,
title = "Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis",
abstract = "Background: The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA).Methods: The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads.Results: The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations.Conclusions: The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.",
author = "Hiromasa Takahashi and Shigeaki Moriyama and Haruhiko Furuta and Hisao Matsunaga and Yuki Sakamoto and Toshihiro Kikuta",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/1746-160X-6-4",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Head and Face Medicine",
issn = "1746-160X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

T2 - Biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis

AU - Takahashi, Hiromasa

AU - Moriyama, Shigeaki

AU - Furuta, Haruhiko

AU - Matsunaga, Hisao

AU - Sakamoto, Yuki

AU - Kikuta, Toshihiro

PY - 2010/3/26

Y1 - 2010/3/26

N2 - Background: The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA).Methods: The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads.Results: The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations.Conclusions: The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.

AB - Background: The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA).Methods: The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads.Results: The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations.Conclusions: The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952948680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952948680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1746-160X-6-4

DO - 10.1186/1746-160X-6-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20346142

AN - SCOPUS:77952948680

VL - 6

JO - Head and Face Medicine

JF - Head and Face Medicine

SN - 1746-160X

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -