Time discounting: Declining impatience and interval effect

Yusuke Kinari, Fumio Ohtake, Yoshiro Tsutsui

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Most studies have not distinguished delay from intervals, so that whether the declining impatience really holds has been an open question. We conducted an experiment that explicitly distinguishes them, and confirmed it at short delay such as less than 8-week delay. This implies that people make dynamically inconsistent plans. We also found the interval effect that the time discount rate decreases with prolonged intervals. We show that the interval and the magnitude effects are caused because intertemporal choice is made partially based on the differential in reward amount, while Weber’s law explains neither the delay nor the interval effects sufficiently.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBehavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness
PublisherSpringer Japan
Pages49-76
Number of pages28
ISBN (Electronic)9784431554028
ISBN (Print)9784431554011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Reward
Discounting
Impatience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Kinari, Y., Ohtake, F., & Tsutsui, Y. (2016). Time discounting: Declining impatience and interval effect. In Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness (pp. 49-76). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_3

Time discounting : Declining impatience and interval effect. / Kinari, Yusuke; Ohtake, Fumio; Tsutsui, Yoshiro.

Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness. Springer Japan, 2016. p. 49-76.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kinari, Y, Ohtake, F & Tsutsui, Y 2016, Time discounting: Declining impatience and interval effect. in Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness. Springer Japan, pp. 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_3
Kinari Y, Ohtake F, Tsutsui Y. Time discounting: Declining impatience and interval effect. In Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness. Springer Japan. 2016. p. 49-76 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_3
Kinari, Yusuke ; Ohtake, Fumio ; Tsutsui, Yoshiro. / Time discounting : Declining impatience and interval effect. Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness. Springer Japan, 2016. pp. 49-76
@inbook{aef324ef42fb40e8a9d1f4523d72c32d,
title = "Time discounting: Declining impatience and interval effect",
abstract = "Most studies have not distinguished delay from intervals, so that whether the declining impatience really holds has been an open question. We conducted an experiment that explicitly distinguishes them, and confirmed it at short delay such as less than 8-week delay. This implies that people make dynamically inconsistent plans. We also found the interval effect that the time discount rate decreases with prolonged intervals. We show that the interval and the magnitude effects are caused because intertemporal choice is made partially based on the differential in reward amount, while Weber’s law explains neither the delay nor the interval effects sufficiently.",
author = "Yusuke Kinari and Fumio Ohtake and Yoshiro Tsutsui",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_3",
language = "English",
isbn = "9784431554011",
pages = "49--76",
booktitle = "Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
address = "Japan",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Time discounting

T2 - Declining impatience and interval effect

AU - Kinari, Yusuke

AU - Ohtake, Fumio

AU - Tsutsui, Yoshiro

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Most studies have not distinguished delay from intervals, so that whether the declining impatience really holds has been an open question. We conducted an experiment that explicitly distinguishes them, and confirmed it at short delay such as less than 8-week delay. This implies that people make dynamically inconsistent plans. We also found the interval effect that the time discount rate decreases with prolonged intervals. We show that the interval and the magnitude effects are caused because intertemporal choice is made partially based on the differential in reward amount, while Weber’s law explains neither the delay nor the interval effects sufficiently.

AB - Most studies have not distinguished delay from intervals, so that whether the declining impatience really holds has been an open question. We conducted an experiment that explicitly distinguishes them, and confirmed it at short delay such as less than 8-week delay. This implies that people make dynamically inconsistent plans. We also found the interval effect that the time discount rate decreases with prolonged intervals. We show that the interval and the magnitude effects are caused because intertemporal choice is made partially based on the differential in reward amount, while Weber’s law explains neither the delay nor the interval effects sufficiently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960211053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960211053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_3

DO - 10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_3

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84960211053

SN - 9784431554011

SP - 49

EP - 76

BT - Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness

PB - Springer Japan

ER -