Toward the rational use of standardized infection ratios to benchmark surgical site infections

Haruhisa Fukuda, Keita Morikane, Manabu Kuroki, Shinichiro Taniguchi, Takashi Shinzato, Fumie Sakamoto, Kunihiko Okada, Hiroshi Matsukawa, Yuko Ieiri, Kouji Hayashi, Shin Kawai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network transitioned from surgical site infection (SSI) rates to the standardized infection ratio (SIR) calculated by statistical models that included perioperative factors (surgical approach and surgery duration). Rationally, however, only patient-related variables should be included in the SIR model. Methods: Logistic regression was performed to predict expected SSI rate in 2 models that included or excluded perioperative factors. Observed and expected SSI rates were used to calculate the SIR for each participating hospital. The difference of SIR in each model was then evaluated. Results: Surveillance data were collected from a total of 1,530 colon surgery patients and 185 SSIs. C-index in the model with perioperative factors was statistically greater than that in the model including patient-related factors only (0.701 vs 0.621, respectively, P <.001). At one particular hospital, for which the percentage of open surgery was lowest (33.2%), SIR estimates changed considerably from 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.00) for the model with perioperative variables to 0.79 (0.75-0.85) for the model without perioperative variables. In another hospital with a high percentage of open surgery (88.6%), the estimate of SIR was decreased by 12.1% in the model without perioperative variables. Conclusion: Because surgical approach and duration of surgery each serve as a partial proxy of the operative process or the competence of surgical teams, these factors should not be considered predictive variables.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)810-814
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume41
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Benchmarking
Infection
Proxy
Statistical Models
Mental Competency
Colon
Logistic Models
Confidence Intervals
Delivery of Health Care
Safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Toward the rational use of standardized infection ratios to benchmark surgical site infections. / Fukuda, Haruhisa; Morikane, Keita; Kuroki, Manabu; Taniguchi, Shinichiro; Shinzato, Takashi; Sakamoto, Fumie; Okada, Kunihiko; Matsukawa, Hiroshi; Ieiri, Yuko; Hayashi, Kouji; Kawai, Shin.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 41, No. 9, 01.09.2013, p. 810-814.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fukuda, H, Morikane, K, Kuroki, M, Taniguchi, S, Shinzato, T, Sakamoto, F, Okada, K, Matsukawa, H, Ieiri, Y, Hayashi, K & Kawai, S 2013, 'Toward the rational use of standardized infection ratios to benchmark surgical site infections', American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 810-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.004
Fukuda, Haruhisa ; Morikane, Keita ; Kuroki, Manabu ; Taniguchi, Shinichiro ; Shinzato, Takashi ; Sakamoto, Fumie ; Okada, Kunihiko ; Matsukawa, Hiroshi ; Ieiri, Yuko ; Hayashi, Kouji ; Kawai, Shin. / Toward the rational use of standardized infection ratios to benchmark surgical site infections. In: American Journal of Infection Control. 2013 ; Vol. 41, No. 9. pp. 810-814.
@article{e562e90b37514dd0af923dd34add7218,
title = "Toward the rational use of standardized infection ratios to benchmark surgical site infections",
abstract = "Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network transitioned from surgical site infection (SSI) rates to the standardized infection ratio (SIR) calculated by statistical models that included perioperative factors (surgical approach and surgery duration). Rationally, however, only patient-related variables should be included in the SIR model. Methods: Logistic regression was performed to predict expected SSI rate in 2 models that included or excluded perioperative factors. Observed and expected SSI rates were used to calculate the SIR for each participating hospital. The difference of SIR in each model was then evaluated. Results: Surveillance data were collected from a total of 1,530 colon surgery patients and 185 SSIs. C-index in the model with perioperative factors was statistically greater than that in the model including patient-related factors only (0.701 vs 0.621, respectively, P <.001). At one particular hospital, for which the percentage of open surgery was lowest (33.2{\%}), SIR estimates changed considerably from 0.92 (95{\%} confidence interval: 0.84-1.00) for the model with perioperative variables to 0.79 (0.75-0.85) for the model without perioperative variables. In another hospital with a high percentage of open surgery (88.6{\%}), the estimate of SIR was decreased by 12.1{\%} in the model without perioperative variables. Conclusion: Because surgical approach and duration of surgery each serve as a partial proxy of the operative process or the competence of surgical teams, these factors should not be considered predictive variables.",
author = "Haruhisa Fukuda and Keita Morikane and Manabu Kuroki and Shinichiro Taniguchi and Takashi Shinzato and Fumie Sakamoto and Kunihiko Okada and Hiroshi Matsukawa and Yuko Ieiri and Kouji Hayashi and Shin Kawai",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "810--814",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward the rational use of standardized infection ratios to benchmark surgical site infections

AU - Fukuda, Haruhisa

AU - Morikane, Keita

AU - Kuroki, Manabu

AU - Taniguchi, Shinichiro

AU - Shinzato, Takashi

AU - Sakamoto, Fumie

AU - Okada, Kunihiko

AU - Matsukawa, Hiroshi

AU - Ieiri, Yuko

AU - Hayashi, Kouji

AU - Kawai, Shin

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network transitioned from surgical site infection (SSI) rates to the standardized infection ratio (SIR) calculated by statistical models that included perioperative factors (surgical approach and surgery duration). Rationally, however, only patient-related variables should be included in the SIR model. Methods: Logistic regression was performed to predict expected SSI rate in 2 models that included or excluded perioperative factors. Observed and expected SSI rates were used to calculate the SIR for each participating hospital. The difference of SIR in each model was then evaluated. Results: Surveillance data were collected from a total of 1,530 colon surgery patients and 185 SSIs. C-index in the model with perioperative factors was statistically greater than that in the model including patient-related factors only (0.701 vs 0.621, respectively, P <.001). At one particular hospital, for which the percentage of open surgery was lowest (33.2%), SIR estimates changed considerably from 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.00) for the model with perioperative variables to 0.79 (0.75-0.85) for the model without perioperative variables. In another hospital with a high percentage of open surgery (88.6%), the estimate of SIR was decreased by 12.1% in the model without perioperative variables. Conclusion: Because surgical approach and duration of surgery each serve as a partial proxy of the operative process or the competence of surgical teams, these factors should not be considered predictive variables.

AB - Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network transitioned from surgical site infection (SSI) rates to the standardized infection ratio (SIR) calculated by statistical models that included perioperative factors (surgical approach and surgery duration). Rationally, however, only patient-related variables should be included in the SIR model. Methods: Logistic regression was performed to predict expected SSI rate in 2 models that included or excluded perioperative factors. Observed and expected SSI rates were used to calculate the SIR for each participating hospital. The difference of SIR in each model was then evaluated. Results: Surveillance data were collected from a total of 1,530 colon surgery patients and 185 SSIs. C-index in the model with perioperative factors was statistically greater than that in the model including patient-related factors only (0.701 vs 0.621, respectively, P <.001). At one particular hospital, for which the percentage of open surgery was lowest (33.2%), SIR estimates changed considerably from 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.00) for the model with perioperative variables to 0.79 (0.75-0.85) for the model without perioperative variables. In another hospital with a high percentage of open surgery (88.6%), the estimate of SIR was decreased by 12.1% in the model without perioperative variables. Conclusion: Because surgical approach and duration of surgery each serve as a partial proxy of the operative process or the competence of surgical teams, these factors should not be considered predictive variables.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883275799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883275799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 23375577

AN - SCOPUS:84883275799

VL - 41

SP - 810

EP - 814

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 9

ER -