Trends in surgical results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1,000 consecutive cases over 20 years in a single institution

Yo Ichi Yamashita, Eiji Tsuijita, Kazuki Takeishi, Teruyoshi Ishida, Toru Ikegami, Takuhiro Ezaki, Takashi Maeda, Tohru Utsunomiya, Naofumi Nagasue, Ken Shirabe, Yoshihiko Maehara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical results have been reported to be improved in hepatic resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years, but the detailed trends in surgical results for HCC in a single high-volume center are still not clear. METHODS: Surgical results in 1,000 hepatic resections for HCC performed at a single medical center from 1989 to 2011 were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those performed in the early period (1989 to 1995, n = 181), the middle period (1996 to 2004, n = 391), and the late period (2005 to 2011, n = 428). RESULTS: Hospital mortality (3.9%, 1.0%, and.5%; P =.0027) and morbidity (45%, 24%, and 15%; P <.0001) rates were significantly decreased. The overall survival rates were significantly improved (50%, 72%, and 78% at 5 years; P =.0021), but there was no significant difference in the disease-free survival (29%, 34%, and 31% at 5 years; P =.7823). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical results of hepatic resections for HCC were significantly improved, with the mortality rate nearly reaching 0%. The 5-year survival rate after hepatic resections for HCC was also improved to 78%, but the consistently high rate of HCC recurrence after hepatic remains a problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)890-896
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume207
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in surgical results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1,000 consecutive cases over 20 years in a single institution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this