Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more

Kinuko Nagayoshi, Takashi Ueki, Yasunobu Nishioka, Tatsuya Manabe, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Minako Hirahashi, Yoshinao Oda, Masao Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extranodal tumor deposits are involved in TNM classification. However, it is uncertain whether a tumor deposit is a regular lymph node metastasis, and its prognostic significance in patients with stage II or II colorectal cancer remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of tumor deposits for stage II and II colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of clinicopathological data. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital/referral center in Japan. PATIENTS: We reviewed the clinical course of 171 stage II and 173 stage II consecutive patients between January 1999 and December 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We examined the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers with tumor deposits and calculated overall survival and recurrence-free survival of the patients according to the status of tumor deposits. The primary outcome was the impact of tumor deposits on patient survival. RESULTS: Thirty-five (10.2%) patients with colorectal cancers had tumor deposits in the pericolic and/or mesocolic region. Survival rates among the patients with tumor deposits were significantly lower than those without (5-year overall survival: 58.4% vs 81.0%, p < 0.0001; 5-year recurrence-free survival: 47.1% vs 73.4%, p < 0.0001). Tumor deposit was an independent prognostic factor for patients with colorectal cancer in multivariate analysis (overall survival: HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.264.04; p = 0.04; recurrence-free survival: HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.044.90; p = 0.04). Tumor deposit was an independent prognostic factor in N0 and N1 colorectal cancer, whereas N2 cancer had poor survival outcome regardless of tumor deposit. LIMITATIONS: Our study was a single-institution retrospective study, and the numbers of patients were relatively small to draw firm conclusions. CONCLUSION: Tumor deposit may be an independent adverse prognostic factor for stage II and II N1 colorectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-474
Number of pages8
JournalDiseases of the colon and rectum
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this