Type A and Type B behaviors, work stressors, and social support at work

Akihito Hagihara, Kimio Tarumi, Alan S. Miller, Kanehisa Morimoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. How Type A personality is related to the stress process has been investigated. However, in the occupational health field, stressful aspects of the work environment for Type A or B workers have not been fully revealed. Methods. In the present study, using signal detection analysis, we analyzed data concerning work stressors and social support (SS) at work among Japanese white-collar workers (n = 560) and identified the respective aspects of work that are stressful for Type A and B workers. We also evaluated the interactions of SS at work and stressor variables among Type A and B workers, individually. Results. Except for one significant predictor, i.e., being unable to learn new things at work, the significant predictors of mental stress were generally quite different for Type A and B workers. Specifically, SS from management was a cause of mental stress for certain groups of Type A workers. Conclusions. It was revealed that the stressful aspects of work environment varied markedly in accord with the Type A vs Type B personality status of the subjects. The results also implied that even support from management can be stressful for Type A workers who had heavy workloads. The present study used specific measures sensitive to individual stressors and identified specific subgroups with the same work stressors. The findings provide information that is useful for stress reduction intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-494
Number of pages9
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Social Support
Type B Personality
Type A Personality
Occupational Health
Workload

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Type A and Type B behaviors, work stressors, and social support at work. / Hagihara, Akihito; Tarumi, Kimio; Miller, Alan S.; Morimoto, Kanehisa.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.01.1997, p. 486-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hagihara, A, Tarumi, K, Miller, AS & Morimoto, K 1997, 'Type A and Type B behaviors, work stressors, and social support at work', Preventive Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 486-494. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1997.0162
Hagihara, Akihito ; Tarumi, Kimio ; Miller, Alan S. ; Morimoto, Kanehisa. / Type A and Type B behaviors, work stressors, and social support at work. In: Preventive Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 486-494.
@article{387a315e3e97491e96cbeca1a2a0890f,
title = "Type A and Type B behaviors, work stressors, and social support at work",
abstract = "Background. How Type A personality is related to the stress process has been investigated. However, in the occupational health field, stressful aspects of the work environment for Type A or B workers have not been fully revealed. Methods. In the present study, using signal detection analysis, we analyzed data concerning work stressors and social support (SS) at work among Japanese white-collar workers (n = 560) and identified the respective aspects of work that are stressful for Type A and B workers. We also evaluated the interactions of SS at work and stressor variables among Type A and B workers, individually. Results. Except for one significant predictor, i.e., being unable to learn new things at work, the significant predictors of mental stress were generally quite different for Type A and B workers. Specifically, SS from management was a cause of mental stress for certain groups of Type A workers. Conclusions. It was revealed that the stressful aspects of work environment varied markedly in accord with the Type A vs Type B personality status of the subjects. The results also implied that even support from management can be stressful for Type A workers who had heavy workloads. The present study used specific measures sensitive to individual stressors and identified specific subgroups with the same work stressors. The findings provide information that is useful for stress reduction intervention.",
author = "Akihito Hagihara and Kimio Tarumi and Miller, {Alan S.} and Kanehisa Morimoto",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/pmed.1997.0162",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "486--494",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Type A and Type B behaviors, work stressors, and social support at work

AU - Hagihara, Akihito

AU - Tarumi, Kimio

AU - Miller, Alan S.

AU - Morimoto, Kanehisa

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Background. How Type A personality is related to the stress process has been investigated. However, in the occupational health field, stressful aspects of the work environment for Type A or B workers have not been fully revealed. Methods. In the present study, using signal detection analysis, we analyzed data concerning work stressors and social support (SS) at work among Japanese white-collar workers (n = 560) and identified the respective aspects of work that are stressful for Type A and B workers. We also evaluated the interactions of SS at work and stressor variables among Type A and B workers, individually. Results. Except for one significant predictor, i.e., being unable to learn new things at work, the significant predictors of mental stress were generally quite different for Type A and B workers. Specifically, SS from management was a cause of mental stress for certain groups of Type A workers. Conclusions. It was revealed that the stressful aspects of work environment varied markedly in accord with the Type A vs Type B personality status of the subjects. The results also implied that even support from management can be stressful for Type A workers who had heavy workloads. The present study used specific measures sensitive to individual stressors and identified specific subgroups with the same work stressors. The findings provide information that is useful for stress reduction intervention.

AB - Background. How Type A personality is related to the stress process has been investigated. However, in the occupational health field, stressful aspects of the work environment for Type A or B workers have not been fully revealed. Methods. In the present study, using signal detection analysis, we analyzed data concerning work stressors and social support (SS) at work among Japanese white-collar workers (n = 560) and identified the respective aspects of work that are stressful for Type A and B workers. We also evaluated the interactions of SS at work and stressor variables among Type A and B workers, individually. Results. Except for one significant predictor, i.e., being unable to learn new things at work, the significant predictors of mental stress were generally quite different for Type A and B workers. Specifically, SS from management was a cause of mental stress for certain groups of Type A workers. Conclusions. It was revealed that the stressful aspects of work environment varied markedly in accord with the Type A vs Type B personality status of the subjects. The results also implied that even support from management can be stressful for Type A workers who had heavy workloads. The present study used specific measures sensitive to individual stressors and identified specific subgroups with the same work stressors. The findings provide information that is useful for stress reduction intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031194809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031194809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/pmed.1997.0162

DO - 10.1006/pmed.1997.0162

M3 - Article

C2 - 9245671

AN - SCOPUS:0031194809

VL - 26

SP - 486

EP - 494

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 4

ER -