Ultrahigh-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone

Koji Yamashita, Akio Hiwatashi, Osamu Togao, Kazufumi Kikuchi, Nozomu Matsumoto, Daichi Momosaka, Hiroshi Nakatake, Yuki Sakai, Hiroshi Honda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Ultrahigh-resolution CT (U-HRCT) provides better spatial resolution than conventional multi-detector row CT (ConvCT) and could be expected to identify microstructures with its 0.25-mm collimation, 1792 channels and 160 detector rows, 0.4 × 0.5 mm focus size, and a 1024 matrix. The aim of the study was to evaluate key anatomic structures in temporal bone using U-HRCT comparing it to ConvCT. Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients (14 males and 16 females; age range, 8–82 years; median 49 years) underwent both U-HRCT and ConvCT. All CT images were obtained with 0.5 mm section thickness and a 512 × 512 matrix, and field of view of 80 mm. Transverse scans were acquired in a plane parallel to the orbitomeatal plane in the helical mode with 120 kV. Images of the 30 temporal bones of unaffected side were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists who rated the visibility of key anatomic structures for both U-HRCT and ConvCT. The ratings between U-HRCT and ConvCT were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. The interobserver agreement on the rating of stapedius tendon was evaluated using weighted κ statistics. Results: Excellent interobserver agreement was shown for U-HRCT (κ = 0.920), whereas good agreement was obtained for ConvCT (κ = 0.733). According to both observers, stapedius tendon was more clearly visualized using U-HRCT than ConvCT (p < 0.0001). All other anatomic structures were well visualized using both CT scanners. Conclusion: The anatomy of temporal bone is more conspicuous on U-HRCT than on ConvCT because of its ultra-high-resolution detector. U-HRCT may provide beneficial information for determining surgical indication or procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2797-2803
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume275
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Temporal Bone
Stapedius
Tendons
Anatomy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Ultrahigh-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone. / Yamashita, Koji; Hiwatashi, Akio; Togao, Osamu; Kikuchi, Kazufumi; Matsumoto, Nozomu; Momosaka, Daichi; Nakatake, Hiroshi; Sakai, Yuki; Honda, Hiroshi.

In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Vol. 275, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 2797-2803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yamashita, Koji ; Hiwatashi, Akio ; Togao, Osamu ; Kikuchi, Kazufumi ; Matsumoto, Nozomu ; Momosaka, Daichi ; Nakatake, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Yuki ; Honda, Hiroshi. / Ultrahigh-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone. In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2018 ; Vol. 275, No. 11. pp. 2797-2803.
@article{1251a118fbca4cc3b524585488c3be69,
title = "Ultrahigh-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone",
abstract = "Objective: Ultrahigh-resolution CT (U-HRCT) provides better spatial resolution than conventional multi-detector row CT (ConvCT) and could be expected to identify microstructures with its 0.25-mm collimation, 1792 channels and 160 detector rows, 0.4 × 0.5 mm focus size, and a 1024 matrix. The aim of the study was to evaluate key anatomic structures in temporal bone using U-HRCT comparing it to ConvCT. Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients (14 males and 16 females; age range, 8–82 years; median 49 years) underwent both U-HRCT and ConvCT. All CT images were obtained with 0.5 mm section thickness and a 512 × 512 matrix, and field of view of 80 mm. Transverse scans were acquired in a plane parallel to the orbitomeatal plane in the helical mode with 120 kV. Images of the 30 temporal bones of unaffected side were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists who rated the visibility of key anatomic structures for both U-HRCT and ConvCT. The ratings between U-HRCT and ConvCT were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. The interobserver agreement on the rating of stapedius tendon was evaluated using weighted κ statistics. Results: Excellent interobserver agreement was shown for U-HRCT (κ = 0.920), whereas good agreement was obtained for ConvCT (κ = 0.733). According to both observers, stapedius tendon was more clearly visualized using U-HRCT than ConvCT (p < 0.0001). All other anatomic structures were well visualized using both CT scanners. Conclusion: The anatomy of temporal bone is more conspicuous on U-HRCT than on ConvCT because of its ultra-high-resolution detector. U-HRCT may provide beneficial information for determining surgical indication or procedures.",
author = "Koji Yamashita and Akio Hiwatashi and Osamu Togao and Kazufumi Kikuchi and Nozomu Matsumoto and Daichi Momosaka and Hiroshi Nakatake and Yuki Sakai and Hiroshi Honda",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00405-018-5101-6",
language = "English",
volume = "275",
pages = "2797--2803",
journal = "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology",
issn = "0937-4477",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrahigh-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone

AU - Yamashita, Koji

AU - Hiwatashi, Akio

AU - Togao, Osamu

AU - Kikuchi, Kazufumi

AU - Matsumoto, Nozomu

AU - Momosaka, Daichi

AU - Nakatake, Hiroshi

AU - Sakai, Yuki

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Objective: Ultrahigh-resolution CT (U-HRCT) provides better spatial resolution than conventional multi-detector row CT (ConvCT) and could be expected to identify microstructures with its 0.25-mm collimation, 1792 channels and 160 detector rows, 0.4 × 0.5 mm focus size, and a 1024 matrix. The aim of the study was to evaluate key anatomic structures in temporal bone using U-HRCT comparing it to ConvCT. Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients (14 males and 16 females; age range, 8–82 years; median 49 years) underwent both U-HRCT and ConvCT. All CT images were obtained with 0.5 mm section thickness and a 512 × 512 matrix, and field of view of 80 mm. Transverse scans were acquired in a plane parallel to the orbitomeatal plane in the helical mode with 120 kV. Images of the 30 temporal bones of unaffected side were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists who rated the visibility of key anatomic structures for both U-HRCT and ConvCT. The ratings between U-HRCT and ConvCT were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. The interobserver agreement on the rating of stapedius tendon was evaluated using weighted κ statistics. Results: Excellent interobserver agreement was shown for U-HRCT (κ = 0.920), whereas good agreement was obtained for ConvCT (κ = 0.733). According to both observers, stapedius tendon was more clearly visualized using U-HRCT than ConvCT (p < 0.0001). All other anatomic structures were well visualized using both CT scanners. Conclusion: The anatomy of temporal bone is more conspicuous on U-HRCT than on ConvCT because of its ultra-high-resolution detector. U-HRCT may provide beneficial information for determining surgical indication or procedures.

AB - Objective: Ultrahigh-resolution CT (U-HRCT) provides better spatial resolution than conventional multi-detector row CT (ConvCT) and could be expected to identify microstructures with its 0.25-mm collimation, 1792 channels and 160 detector rows, 0.4 × 0.5 mm focus size, and a 1024 matrix. The aim of the study was to evaluate key anatomic structures in temporal bone using U-HRCT comparing it to ConvCT. Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients (14 males and 16 females; age range, 8–82 years; median 49 years) underwent both U-HRCT and ConvCT. All CT images were obtained with 0.5 mm section thickness and a 512 × 512 matrix, and field of view of 80 mm. Transverse scans were acquired in a plane parallel to the orbitomeatal plane in the helical mode with 120 kV. Images of the 30 temporal bones of unaffected side were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists who rated the visibility of key anatomic structures for both U-HRCT and ConvCT. The ratings between U-HRCT and ConvCT were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. The interobserver agreement on the rating of stapedius tendon was evaluated using weighted κ statistics. Results: Excellent interobserver agreement was shown for U-HRCT (κ = 0.920), whereas good agreement was obtained for ConvCT (κ = 0.733). According to both observers, stapedius tendon was more clearly visualized using U-HRCT than ConvCT (p < 0.0001). All other anatomic structures were well visualized using both CT scanners. Conclusion: The anatomy of temporal bone is more conspicuous on U-HRCT than on ConvCT because of its ultra-high-resolution detector. U-HRCT may provide beneficial information for determining surgical indication or procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053257531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053257531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00405-018-5101-6

DO - 10.1007/s00405-018-5101-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 30159727

AN - SCOPUS:85053257531

VL - 275

SP - 2797

EP - 2803

JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

SN - 0937-4477

IS - 11

ER -