Understand after like, viewer's delight? A fNIRS study of order-effect in combined hedonic and cognitive appraisal of art

Matthew Pelowski, Misato Terai, Tao Liu, Shuang Meng, Godai Saito, Hirofumi Saito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate neural and behavioral aspects of the interrelation between ‘liking’ and ‘understanding’ when both appraisals are made within one judgment task. Our goal was to explore questions regarding how these appraisals combine, and specifically whether there is an order-effect when both are employed in sequence. To this end, we tested a hypothesis derived from new models in neuroaesthetics, and concerning processing of art, which suggest that perception may involve a natural sequence from first processing for hedonic quality (i.e., liking) followed by processing for understanding. Thus, due to the initial liking assessment's capacity to prime deepened cognitive involvement, a Liking-Understanding order may show key differences in final assessments or brain activation when compared to an Understanding-Liking sequence. Thirty-two participants evaluated a range of paintings, balanced for visual appeal and understandability, in a two-part task in which half evaluated for understanding followed by liking and the other half had question order reversed. Brain activity was recorded via functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Results showed no assessment interrelation or order effect in artwork evaluations. However, participants who began with evaluation for liking, and who came to incongruent combinations (i.e., “I like, but I don't understand” or “I don't like, but I understand”), showed significantly higher activation in left medial prefrontal cortex. This area is functionally associated with attention and integration of hedonic/informational elements. Findings provide tentative support for a liking-driven order-effect, as well as for physiological connection between appraisals, which may not appear in behavioral evidence, and suggest need for further consideration of this topic in appraisal research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-138
Number of pages12
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume170
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Art
Paintings
Brain
Prefrontal Cortex
Research
Infrared Spectroscopy
Viewer
Evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Understand after like, viewer's delight? A fNIRS study of order-effect in combined hedonic and cognitive appraisal of art. / Pelowski, Matthew; Terai, Misato; Liu, Tao; Meng, Shuang; Saito, Godai; Saito, Hirofumi.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 170, 01.10.2016, p. 127-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pelowski, Matthew ; Terai, Misato ; Liu, Tao ; Meng, Shuang ; Saito, Godai ; Saito, Hirofumi. / Understand after like, viewer's delight? A fNIRS study of order-effect in combined hedonic and cognitive appraisal of art. In: Acta Psychologica. 2016 ; Vol. 170. pp. 127-138.
@article{c2cc6602ffff47ea8e94bd43e6ae5c47,
title = "Understand after like, viewer's delight? A fNIRS study of order-effect in combined hedonic and cognitive appraisal of art",
abstract = "We investigate neural and behavioral aspects of the interrelation between ‘liking’ and ‘understanding’ when both appraisals are made within one judgment task. Our goal was to explore questions regarding how these appraisals combine, and specifically whether there is an order-effect when both are employed in sequence. To this end, we tested a hypothesis derived from new models in neuroaesthetics, and concerning processing of art, which suggest that perception may involve a natural sequence from first processing for hedonic quality (i.e., liking) followed by processing for understanding. Thus, due to the initial liking assessment's capacity to prime deepened cognitive involvement, a Liking-Understanding order may show key differences in final assessments or brain activation when compared to an Understanding-Liking sequence. Thirty-two participants evaluated a range of paintings, balanced for visual appeal and understandability, in a two-part task in which half evaluated for understanding followed by liking and the other half had question order reversed. Brain activity was recorded via functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Results showed no assessment interrelation or order effect in artwork evaluations. However, participants who began with evaluation for liking, and who came to incongruent combinations (i.e., “I like, but I don't understand” or “I don't like, but I understand”), showed significantly higher activation in left medial prefrontal cortex. This area is functionally associated with attention and integration of hedonic/informational elements. Findings provide tentative support for a liking-driven order-effect, as well as for physiological connection between appraisals, which may not appear in behavioral evidence, and suggest need for further consideration of this topic in appraisal research.",
author = "Matthew Pelowski and Misato Terai and Tao Liu and Shuang Meng and Godai Saito and Hirofumi Saito",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "170",
pages = "127--138",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understand after like, viewer's delight? A fNIRS study of order-effect in combined hedonic and cognitive appraisal of art

AU - Pelowski, Matthew

AU - Terai, Misato

AU - Liu, Tao

AU - Meng, Shuang

AU - Saito, Godai

AU - Saito, Hirofumi

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - We investigate neural and behavioral aspects of the interrelation between ‘liking’ and ‘understanding’ when both appraisals are made within one judgment task. Our goal was to explore questions regarding how these appraisals combine, and specifically whether there is an order-effect when both are employed in sequence. To this end, we tested a hypothesis derived from new models in neuroaesthetics, and concerning processing of art, which suggest that perception may involve a natural sequence from first processing for hedonic quality (i.e., liking) followed by processing for understanding. Thus, due to the initial liking assessment's capacity to prime deepened cognitive involvement, a Liking-Understanding order may show key differences in final assessments or brain activation when compared to an Understanding-Liking sequence. Thirty-two participants evaluated a range of paintings, balanced for visual appeal and understandability, in a two-part task in which half evaluated for understanding followed by liking and the other half had question order reversed. Brain activity was recorded via functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Results showed no assessment interrelation or order effect in artwork evaluations. However, participants who began with evaluation for liking, and who came to incongruent combinations (i.e., “I like, but I don't understand” or “I don't like, but I understand”), showed significantly higher activation in left medial prefrontal cortex. This area is functionally associated with attention and integration of hedonic/informational elements. Findings provide tentative support for a liking-driven order-effect, as well as for physiological connection between appraisals, which may not appear in behavioral evidence, and suggest need for further consideration of this topic in appraisal research.

AB - We investigate neural and behavioral aspects of the interrelation between ‘liking’ and ‘understanding’ when both appraisals are made within one judgment task. Our goal was to explore questions regarding how these appraisals combine, and specifically whether there is an order-effect when both are employed in sequence. To this end, we tested a hypothesis derived from new models in neuroaesthetics, and concerning processing of art, which suggest that perception may involve a natural sequence from first processing for hedonic quality (i.e., liking) followed by processing for understanding. Thus, due to the initial liking assessment's capacity to prime deepened cognitive involvement, a Liking-Understanding order may show key differences in final assessments or brain activation when compared to an Understanding-Liking sequence. Thirty-two participants evaluated a range of paintings, balanced for visual appeal and understandability, in a two-part task in which half evaluated for understanding followed by liking and the other half had question order reversed. Brain activity was recorded via functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Results showed no assessment interrelation or order effect in artwork evaluations. However, participants who began with evaluation for liking, and who came to incongruent combinations (i.e., “I like, but I don't understand” or “I don't like, but I understand”), showed significantly higher activation in left medial prefrontal cortex. This area is functionally associated with attention and integration of hedonic/informational elements. Findings provide tentative support for a liking-driven order-effect, as well as for physiological connection between appraisals, which may not appear in behavioral evidence, and suggest need for further consideration of this topic in appraisal research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977177471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977177471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 27393913

AN - SCOPUS:84977177471

VL - 170

SP - 127

EP - 138

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

ER -