Abstract
Purpose: As a step to large-scale clinical trials, we conducted a small-scale exploratory study to clarify whether the secondary lumen of the double-lumen (DL) peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could perform as well as the secondary lumen of the DL centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), with an acceptable complication rate in the perioperative surgery period. Methods: Forty thoracic esophageal cancer patients requiring central venous catheterization during the perioperative period were assigned to the DL-PICC (4.5-French, 60-cm) group or the DL-CICC (16-gauge, 30-cm) group, with 1:1 randomization. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of continuous catecholamine infusion via the secondary lumen during the observation period. Results: Thirty-two cases (14 cases in the PICC group and 18 cases in the CICC group) were analyzed. Continuous catecholamine infusion via the secondary lumen was completed in all 32 cases. No major complications related to PICC/CICC placement/maintenance were noted in the groups during the median observation period of 6 days. Conclusions: The secondary lumen of the DL-PICCs performed as well as the secondary lumen of the DL-CICCs with acceptable safety during the relatively short perioperative period of these thoracic esophageal cancer patients (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000008131).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 338-343 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Vascular Access |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
- Nephrology
Cite this
Use of double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters for safer perioperative management of esophageal cancer patients. / Fukuda, Shuichi; Nakajima, Kiyokazu; Miyazaki, Yasuhiro; Takahashi, Tsuyoshi; Kurokawa, Yukinori; Yamasaki, Makoto; Miyata, Hiroshi; Takiguchi, Shuji; Mori, Masaki; Doki, Yuichiro.
In: Journal of Vascular Access, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 338-343.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters for safer perioperative management of esophageal cancer patients
AU - Fukuda, Shuichi
AU - Nakajima, Kiyokazu
AU - Miyazaki, Yasuhiro
AU - Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori
AU - Yamasaki, Makoto
AU - Miyata, Hiroshi
AU - Takiguchi, Shuji
AU - Mori, Masaki
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Purpose: As a step to large-scale clinical trials, we conducted a small-scale exploratory study to clarify whether the secondary lumen of the double-lumen (DL) peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could perform as well as the secondary lumen of the DL centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), with an acceptable complication rate in the perioperative surgery period. Methods: Forty thoracic esophageal cancer patients requiring central venous catheterization during the perioperative period were assigned to the DL-PICC (4.5-French, 60-cm) group or the DL-CICC (16-gauge, 30-cm) group, with 1:1 randomization. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of continuous catecholamine infusion via the secondary lumen during the observation period. Results: Thirty-two cases (14 cases in the PICC group and 18 cases in the CICC group) were analyzed. Continuous catecholamine infusion via the secondary lumen was completed in all 32 cases. No major complications related to PICC/CICC placement/maintenance were noted in the groups during the median observation period of 6 days. Conclusions: The secondary lumen of the DL-PICCs performed as well as the secondary lumen of the DL-CICCs with acceptable safety during the relatively short perioperative period of these thoracic esophageal cancer patients (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000008131).
AB - Purpose: As a step to large-scale clinical trials, we conducted a small-scale exploratory study to clarify whether the secondary lumen of the double-lumen (DL) peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could perform as well as the secondary lumen of the DL centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), with an acceptable complication rate in the perioperative surgery period. Methods: Forty thoracic esophageal cancer patients requiring central venous catheterization during the perioperative period were assigned to the DL-PICC (4.5-French, 60-cm) group or the DL-CICC (16-gauge, 30-cm) group, with 1:1 randomization. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of continuous catecholamine infusion via the secondary lumen during the observation period. Results: Thirty-two cases (14 cases in the PICC group and 18 cases in the CICC group) were analyzed. Continuous catecholamine infusion via the secondary lumen was completed in all 32 cases. No major complications related to PICC/CICC placement/maintenance were noted in the groups during the median observation period of 6 days. Conclusions: The secondary lumen of the DL-PICCs performed as well as the secondary lumen of the DL-CICCs with acceptable safety during the relatively short perioperative period of these thoracic esophageal cancer patients (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000008131).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941208212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941208212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5301/jva.5000382
DO - 10.5301/jva.5000382
M3 - Article
C2 - 25907772
AN - SCOPUS:84941208212
VL - 16
SP - 338
EP - 343
JO - Journal of Vascular Access
JF - Journal of Vascular Access
SN - 1129-7298
IS - 4
ER -