Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus

Lan Chen, Leonard Lyman Stephen, Huong Do, Jon Karlsson, Stephanie P. Adam, Elizabeth Young, Jonathan T. Deland, Scott J. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires such as the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) are useful in evaluating results after orthopedic interventions. However, despite being frequently used in the literature, its validity has not been established for forefoot disorders. Our study aimed to validate the FAOS for use in assessing outcomes of hallux valgus surgery. Methods: From 2006 to 2009, 195 patients with nonarthritic hallux valgus were included in the construct validity portion of the study. Patients had a SF-36 and a FAOS completed. Forty additional patients, both preoperative and postoperative, were given questionnaires to assess the relevance of each of the FAOS questions as it pertained to their bunions. Patients were also given the FAOS 1 month after the first to assess FAOS reliability. Responsiveness of the FAOS was included with 40 patients who had both preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores. Results: Four out of five FAOS subscales demonstrated acceptable correlation with the SF-36. The FAOS symptoms subscale showed the least correlation with SF-36, demonstrating the foot-specific nature of the questions. Both preoperative and postoperative patients rated the FAOS quality of life questions as the most relevant. All five subscales achieved acceptable test-retest reliability. The FAOS sports and recreation subscale was the least responsive. Conclusion: Patient-based assessments have become increasingly important in evaluating treatment effectiveness. This study has shown that the FAOS has acceptable construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness in hallux valgus patients and is a useful patient-based tool in assessing these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1145-1155
Number of pages11
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume33
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hallux Valgus
Ankle
Foot
Reproducibility of Results
Recreation
Sports
Orthopedics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Chen, L., Lyman Stephen, L., Do, H., Karlsson, J., Adam, S. P., Young, E., ... Ellis, S. J. (2012). Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 33(12), 1145-1155. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.1145

Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. / Chen, Lan; Lyman Stephen, Leonard; Do, Huong; Karlsson, Jon; Adam, Stephanie P.; Young, Elizabeth; Deland, Jonathan T.; Ellis, Scott J.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 33, No. 12, 01.12.2012, p. 1145-1155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, L, Lyman Stephen, L, Do, H, Karlsson, J, Adam, SP, Young, E, Deland, JT & Ellis, SJ 2012, 'Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus', Foot and Ankle International, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1145-1155. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.1145
Chen, Lan ; Lyman Stephen, Leonard ; Do, Huong ; Karlsson, Jon ; Adam, Stephanie P. ; Young, Elizabeth ; Deland, Jonathan T. ; Ellis, Scott J. / Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 12. pp. 1145-1155.
@article{47433b0255d6441fa28d92cfa619ca66,
title = "Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus",
abstract = "Background: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires such as the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) are useful in evaluating results after orthopedic interventions. However, despite being frequently used in the literature, its validity has not been established for forefoot disorders. Our study aimed to validate the FAOS for use in assessing outcomes of hallux valgus surgery. Methods: From 2006 to 2009, 195 patients with nonarthritic hallux valgus were included in the construct validity portion of the study. Patients had a SF-36 and a FAOS completed. Forty additional patients, both preoperative and postoperative, were given questionnaires to assess the relevance of each of the FAOS questions as it pertained to their bunions. Patients were also given the FAOS 1 month after the first to assess FAOS reliability. Responsiveness of the FAOS was included with 40 patients who had both preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores. Results: Four out of five FAOS subscales demonstrated acceptable correlation with the SF-36. The FAOS symptoms subscale showed the least correlation with SF-36, demonstrating the foot-specific nature of the questions. Both preoperative and postoperative patients rated the FAOS quality of life questions as the most relevant. All five subscales achieved acceptable test-retest reliability. The FAOS sports and recreation subscale was the least responsive. Conclusion: Patient-based assessments have become increasingly important in evaluating treatment effectiveness. This study has shown that the FAOS has acceptable construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness in hallux valgus patients and is a useful patient-based tool in assessing these patients.",
author = "Lan Chen and {Lyman Stephen}, Leonard and Huong Do and Jon Karlsson and Adam, {Stephanie P.} and Elizabeth Young and Deland, {Jonathan T.} and Ellis, {Scott J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3113/FAI.2012.1145",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1145--1155",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus

AU - Chen, Lan

AU - Lyman Stephen, Leonard

AU - Do, Huong

AU - Karlsson, Jon

AU - Adam, Stephanie P.

AU - Young, Elizabeth

AU - Deland, Jonathan T.

AU - Ellis, Scott J.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Background: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires such as the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) are useful in evaluating results after orthopedic interventions. However, despite being frequently used in the literature, its validity has not been established for forefoot disorders. Our study aimed to validate the FAOS for use in assessing outcomes of hallux valgus surgery. Methods: From 2006 to 2009, 195 patients with nonarthritic hallux valgus were included in the construct validity portion of the study. Patients had a SF-36 and a FAOS completed. Forty additional patients, both preoperative and postoperative, were given questionnaires to assess the relevance of each of the FAOS questions as it pertained to their bunions. Patients were also given the FAOS 1 month after the first to assess FAOS reliability. Responsiveness of the FAOS was included with 40 patients who had both preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores. Results: Four out of five FAOS subscales demonstrated acceptable correlation with the SF-36. The FAOS symptoms subscale showed the least correlation with SF-36, demonstrating the foot-specific nature of the questions. Both preoperative and postoperative patients rated the FAOS quality of life questions as the most relevant. All five subscales achieved acceptable test-retest reliability. The FAOS sports and recreation subscale was the least responsive. Conclusion: Patient-based assessments have become increasingly important in evaluating treatment effectiveness. This study has shown that the FAOS has acceptable construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness in hallux valgus patients and is a useful patient-based tool in assessing these patients.

AB - Background: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires such as the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) are useful in evaluating results after orthopedic interventions. However, despite being frequently used in the literature, its validity has not been established for forefoot disorders. Our study aimed to validate the FAOS for use in assessing outcomes of hallux valgus surgery. Methods: From 2006 to 2009, 195 patients with nonarthritic hallux valgus were included in the construct validity portion of the study. Patients had a SF-36 and a FAOS completed. Forty additional patients, both preoperative and postoperative, were given questionnaires to assess the relevance of each of the FAOS questions as it pertained to their bunions. Patients were also given the FAOS 1 month after the first to assess FAOS reliability. Responsiveness of the FAOS was included with 40 patients who had both preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores. Results: Four out of five FAOS subscales demonstrated acceptable correlation with the SF-36. The FAOS symptoms subscale showed the least correlation with SF-36, demonstrating the foot-specific nature of the questions. Both preoperative and postoperative patients rated the FAOS quality of life questions as the most relevant. All five subscales achieved acceptable test-retest reliability. The FAOS sports and recreation subscale was the least responsive. Conclusion: Patient-based assessments have become increasingly important in evaluating treatment effectiveness. This study has shown that the FAOS has acceptable construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness in hallux valgus patients and is a useful patient-based tool in assessing these patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870702974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870702974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3113/FAI.2012.1145

DO - 10.3113/FAI.2012.1145

M3 - Article

C2 - 23199868

AN - SCOPUS:84870702974

VL - 33

SP - 1145

EP - 1155

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 12

ER -