Validation of the tail replacement method in MTF calculations using the homogeneous and non-homogeneous edges of a phantom

C. Anam, W. S. Budi, Toshioh Fujibuchi, F. Haryanto, G. Dougherty

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We validated the tail replacement technique in the modulation transfer function (MTF) calculation of CT images using edges of homogeneous and non-homogeneous phantom using an automated method. The algorithm for the automated MTF calculation consists of several steps. The upper edge of the phantom was detected from its axial image and pixel values was taken to create an edge spread function (ESF). The left tail of the ESF was flipped horizontally to replace the right tail. Differentiating the ESF produced a line spread function (LSF) which was Fourier transformed to produce the MTF. To validate the result for the non-homogeneous phantom was compared with that for a homogeneous phantom. Results showed that in the homogeneous module, the MTF curve generated without tail replacement corresponded to its shape in use. However for the non-homogeneous module, the MTF obtained without tail replacement differed considerably from its shape in use. The 50% value of MTF (MTF-50) without tail replacement was 0.44 cycles/mm compared to 0.33 cycles/mm in use. Using the tail replacement, the MTFs in the homogeneous and non-homogeneous modules were comparable, with MTF-50 values of 0.33 cycles/mm for both. In summary, the MTF cannot be conventionally measured from the edge of the non-homogeneous module, but it can be resolved using the tail replacement technique on the ESF curve.

Original languageEnglish
Article number012001
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume1248
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 6 2019
Event18th Asia-Oceania Congress of Medical Physics, AOCMP 2018 and 16th South-East Asia Congress of Medical Physics, SEACOMP 2018 - Bangsar South, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Duration: Nov 11 2018Nov 14 2018

Fingerprint

modulation transfer function
modules
cycles
curves
pixels

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Validation of the tail replacement method in MTF calculations using the homogeneous and non-homogeneous edges of a phantom. / Anam, C.; Budi, W. S.; Fujibuchi, Toshioh; Haryanto, F.; Dougherty, G.

In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1248, No. 1, 012001, 06.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{1e2b73a63dc74c2293ae78588b7f54d7,
title = "Validation of the tail replacement method in MTF calculations using the homogeneous and non-homogeneous edges of a phantom",
abstract = "We validated the tail replacement technique in the modulation transfer function (MTF) calculation of CT images using edges of homogeneous and non-homogeneous phantom using an automated method. The algorithm for the automated MTF calculation consists of several steps. The upper edge of the phantom was detected from its axial image and pixel values was taken to create an edge spread function (ESF). The left tail of the ESF was flipped horizontally to replace the right tail. Differentiating the ESF produced a line spread function (LSF) which was Fourier transformed to produce the MTF. To validate the result for the non-homogeneous phantom was compared with that for a homogeneous phantom. Results showed that in the homogeneous module, the MTF curve generated without tail replacement corresponded to its shape in use. However for the non-homogeneous module, the MTF obtained without tail replacement differed considerably from its shape in use. The 50{\%} value of MTF (MTF-50) without tail replacement was 0.44 cycles/mm compared to 0.33 cycles/mm in use. Using the tail replacement, the MTFs in the homogeneous and non-homogeneous modules were comparable, with MTF-50 values of 0.33 cycles/mm for both. In summary, the MTF cannot be conventionally measured from the edge of the non-homogeneous module, but it can be resolved using the tail replacement technique on the ESF curve.",
author = "C. Anam and Budi, {W. S.} and Toshioh Fujibuchi and F. Haryanto and G. Dougherty",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012001",
language = "English",
volume = "1248",
journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",
issn = "1742-6588",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the tail replacement method in MTF calculations using the homogeneous and non-homogeneous edges of a phantom

AU - Anam, C.

AU - Budi, W. S.

AU - Fujibuchi, Toshioh

AU - Haryanto, F.

AU - Dougherty, G.

PY - 2019/6/6

Y1 - 2019/6/6

N2 - We validated the tail replacement technique in the modulation transfer function (MTF) calculation of CT images using edges of homogeneous and non-homogeneous phantom using an automated method. The algorithm for the automated MTF calculation consists of several steps. The upper edge of the phantom was detected from its axial image and pixel values was taken to create an edge spread function (ESF). The left tail of the ESF was flipped horizontally to replace the right tail. Differentiating the ESF produced a line spread function (LSF) which was Fourier transformed to produce the MTF. To validate the result for the non-homogeneous phantom was compared with that for a homogeneous phantom. Results showed that in the homogeneous module, the MTF curve generated without tail replacement corresponded to its shape in use. However for the non-homogeneous module, the MTF obtained without tail replacement differed considerably from its shape in use. The 50% value of MTF (MTF-50) without tail replacement was 0.44 cycles/mm compared to 0.33 cycles/mm in use. Using the tail replacement, the MTFs in the homogeneous and non-homogeneous modules were comparable, with MTF-50 values of 0.33 cycles/mm for both. In summary, the MTF cannot be conventionally measured from the edge of the non-homogeneous module, but it can be resolved using the tail replacement technique on the ESF curve.

AB - We validated the tail replacement technique in the modulation transfer function (MTF) calculation of CT images using edges of homogeneous and non-homogeneous phantom using an automated method. The algorithm for the automated MTF calculation consists of several steps. The upper edge of the phantom was detected from its axial image and pixel values was taken to create an edge spread function (ESF). The left tail of the ESF was flipped horizontally to replace the right tail. Differentiating the ESF produced a line spread function (LSF) which was Fourier transformed to produce the MTF. To validate the result for the non-homogeneous phantom was compared with that for a homogeneous phantom. Results showed that in the homogeneous module, the MTF curve generated without tail replacement corresponded to its shape in use. However for the non-homogeneous module, the MTF obtained without tail replacement differed considerably from its shape in use. The 50% value of MTF (MTF-50) without tail replacement was 0.44 cycles/mm compared to 0.33 cycles/mm in use. Using the tail replacement, the MTFs in the homogeneous and non-homogeneous modules were comparable, with MTF-50 values of 0.33 cycles/mm for both. In summary, the MTF cannot be conventionally measured from the edge of the non-homogeneous module, but it can be resolved using the tail replacement technique on the ESF curve.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067640944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067640944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012001

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012001

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85067640944

VL - 1248

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

IS - 1

M1 - 012001

ER -