TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of the γ-Ray Evaluation with iodoamphetamine for Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment (REICA) method for quantification of cerebral blood flow including acetazolamide challenge test
AU - Miyazaki, Yoshiaki
AU - Kameyama, Masashi
AU - Nakamizo, Akira
AU - Noguchi, Tomoyuki
AU - Tabata, Nobuyuki
N1 - Funding Information:
MK is listed as an inventor on a patent application (2019–074369, 2017–199618) related to this work submitted by Nihon Medi-Physics to the Japan Patent Office. MK received research funding from Nihon Medi-Physics and Fujifilm Toyama Chemistry, which supply [I] IMP in Japan. 123
Funding Information:
YM and NT received research funding from Nihon Medi-Physics.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Mr. Kazuki Shimomuta (present affiliation: Itoshima Medical Association Hospital) and Mr. Suguru Kawamuro (present affiliation: Fukuoka Kieikai Hospital), Radiological technologists of the National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center for collecting data, Mr. Tomohiko Aso, a radiological technologist of the National Cancer Center for supporting this study, and Editage (www.editage.com ) for English language editing of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objective: The γ-Ray Evaluation with iodoamphetamine for Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment (REICA) is a new method for quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and [123I]N-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP). The present study aimed to validate the REICA method using data including acetazolamide challenge test. Methods: The REICA and Graph-Plot (GP) methods were used to calculate mean CBF (mCBF) for 92 acquisitions (rest: 57, stress: 35) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 33 patients. To obtain stress data, 15 mg/kg of acetazolamide was injected intravenously 10 min before the administration of 123I-IMP, and blood samples were collected under the same conditions as rest data. The reference standard was the Autoradiograph (ARG) method using arterial blood sampling, and the accuracy of the REICA method was analyzed by comparing it with each method. Results: For mCBF, the correlation coefficients (r) were 0.792 for the REICA method and 0.636 for the GP method. For CVR, r values were 0.660 for the REICA method and 0.578 for the GP method. In both acquisitions, the REICA method had a stronger correlation with the ARG method than the GP method. For mCBF, there was a significant difference in the correlation coefficient between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The REICA method was more accurate than the GP method in quantifying CBF and closer to the ARG method. The REICA method, which is a noninvasive method of cerebral blood flow quantification using 123I-IMP, has great medical usefulness.
AB - Objective: The γ-Ray Evaluation with iodoamphetamine for Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment (REICA) is a new method for quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and [123I]N-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP). The present study aimed to validate the REICA method using data including acetazolamide challenge test. Methods: The REICA and Graph-Plot (GP) methods were used to calculate mean CBF (mCBF) for 92 acquisitions (rest: 57, stress: 35) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 33 patients. To obtain stress data, 15 mg/kg of acetazolamide was injected intravenously 10 min before the administration of 123I-IMP, and blood samples were collected under the same conditions as rest data. The reference standard was the Autoradiograph (ARG) method using arterial blood sampling, and the accuracy of the REICA method was analyzed by comparing it with each method. Results: For mCBF, the correlation coefficients (r) were 0.792 for the REICA method and 0.636 for the GP method. For CVR, r values were 0.660 for the REICA method and 0.578 for the GP method. In both acquisitions, the REICA method had a stronger correlation with the ARG method than the GP method. For mCBF, there was a significant difference in the correlation coefficient between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The REICA method was more accurate than the GP method in quantifying CBF and closer to the ARG method. The REICA method, which is a noninvasive method of cerebral blood flow quantification using 123I-IMP, has great medical usefulness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122004507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122004507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12149-021-01700-w
DO - 10.1007/s12149-021-01700-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 34973145
AN - SCOPUS:85122004507
VL - 36
SP - 279
EP - 284
JO - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
SN - 0914-7187
IS - 3
ER -