Visual categorization of surface qualities of materials by capuchin monkeys and humans

Chihiro Hiramatsu, Kazuo Fujita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Visually identifying and categorizing the material composition of objects before actually interacting with them is an important skill for operating smoothly and safely in the world. This ability is assumed to have been shaped by evolution; therefore, non-human animals should share similar categorization abilities. Little is known, however, about how non-human animals do this. We tested whether tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were able to visually categorize images that represented nine different materials (metal, ceramic, glass, stone, bark, wood, leather, fabric, and fur), and we compared their performance with that of humans. Capuchins showed excellent categorization abilities for images of fur, which is a familiar material to captive monkeys. Humans showed a tendency to confuse material categories that resembled each other visually and/or semantically. Correlation analyses on reaction time showed that both species made correct choices rapidly in selecting glossy categories like metal and ceramic compared with matte categories like fabric and stone, which contain minute patterns. Overall, our results suggest that monkeys share similar perceptual tendencies with humans in visual categorization of material images to some extent and the potential to categorize materials frequently encountered in their daily lives by visual observation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-82
Number of pages12
JournalVision Research
Volume115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cebus
Haplorhini
Metals
Ceramics
Observation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Visual categorization of surface qualities of materials by capuchin monkeys and humans. / Hiramatsu, Chihiro; Fujita, Kazuo.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 115, 01.10.2015, p. 71-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6790040354c4bdea686cc31980dddc2,
title = "Visual categorization of surface qualities of materials by capuchin monkeys and humans",
abstract = "Visually identifying and categorizing the material composition of objects before actually interacting with them is an important skill for operating smoothly and safely in the world. This ability is assumed to have been shaped by evolution; therefore, non-human animals should share similar categorization abilities. Little is known, however, about how non-human animals do this. We tested whether tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were able to visually categorize images that represented nine different materials (metal, ceramic, glass, stone, bark, wood, leather, fabric, and fur), and we compared their performance with that of humans. Capuchins showed excellent categorization abilities for images of fur, which is a familiar material to captive monkeys. Humans showed a tendency to confuse material categories that resembled each other visually and/or semantically. Correlation analyses on reaction time showed that both species made correct choices rapidly in selecting glossy categories like metal and ceramic compared with matte categories like fabric and stone, which contain minute patterns. Overall, our results suggest that monkeys share similar perceptual tendencies with humans in visual categorization of material images to some extent and the potential to categorize materials frequently encountered in their daily lives by visual observation.",
author = "Chihiro Hiramatsu and Kazuo Fujita",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.006",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "71--82",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual categorization of surface qualities of materials by capuchin monkeys and humans

AU - Hiramatsu, Chihiro

AU - Fujita, Kazuo

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Visually identifying and categorizing the material composition of objects before actually interacting with them is an important skill for operating smoothly and safely in the world. This ability is assumed to have been shaped by evolution; therefore, non-human animals should share similar categorization abilities. Little is known, however, about how non-human animals do this. We tested whether tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were able to visually categorize images that represented nine different materials (metal, ceramic, glass, stone, bark, wood, leather, fabric, and fur), and we compared their performance with that of humans. Capuchins showed excellent categorization abilities for images of fur, which is a familiar material to captive monkeys. Humans showed a tendency to confuse material categories that resembled each other visually and/or semantically. Correlation analyses on reaction time showed that both species made correct choices rapidly in selecting glossy categories like metal and ceramic compared with matte categories like fabric and stone, which contain minute patterns. Overall, our results suggest that monkeys share similar perceptual tendencies with humans in visual categorization of material images to some extent and the potential to categorize materials frequently encountered in their daily lives by visual observation.

AB - Visually identifying and categorizing the material composition of objects before actually interacting with them is an important skill for operating smoothly and safely in the world. This ability is assumed to have been shaped by evolution; therefore, non-human animals should share similar categorization abilities. Little is known, however, about how non-human animals do this. We tested whether tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were able to visually categorize images that represented nine different materials (metal, ceramic, glass, stone, bark, wood, leather, fabric, and fur), and we compared their performance with that of humans. Capuchins showed excellent categorization abilities for images of fur, which is a familiar material to captive monkeys. Humans showed a tendency to confuse material categories that resembled each other visually and/or semantically. Correlation analyses on reaction time showed that both species made correct choices rapidly in selecting glossy categories like metal and ceramic compared with matte categories like fabric and stone, which contain minute patterns. Overall, our results suggest that monkeys share similar perceptual tendencies with humans in visual categorization of material images to some extent and the potential to categorize materials frequently encountered in their daily lives by visual observation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940759764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940759764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26325391

AN - SCOPUS:84940759764

VL - 115

SP - 71

EP - 82

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

ER -