What is the best way to represent surface conductance for a range of vegetated sites?

Hikaru Komatsu, Norifumi Hotta, Tomonori Kume

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surface conductance Gs is a significant parameter for indicating the evaporative and photosynthetic properties of a vegetated surface. When comparing Gs values between different observation sites, some studies have used Gsmax and others have used Ĝsmax (where Gsmax is the maximum Gs value measured during the measurement period, and Ĝ smax is the maximum Gs value obtained with a vapour pressure deficit (VPD) of ≥1.0 kPa during the measurement period). In this study, we demonstrate a clear justification for using Ĝsmax instead of Ĝsmax when comparing Gs values between different sites. We examined whether both Ĝsmax and Gsmax lead to the same conclusions in classifying vegetated sites. Komatsu (2003b) [Hydrological Processes 17: 2503-2512] reported a clear relationship between canopy height h and Ĝsmax for coniferous forests with a projected leaf area index (LAI) of ≥3.0. We examined not only the relationship between h and Ĝsmax but also the relationship between h and Gsmax for coniferous forests with a projected LAI of ≥3.0. Both Ĝsmax and Gsmax decreased with increasing h. However, the relationship between h and Gsmax was less well defined than the relationship between h and Ĝ smax because of biased Gsmax data. Consequently, we conclude that Ĝsma'x is a more appropriate index than Gsmax to represent Gs for sites with different vegetation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1142-1147
Number of pages6
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 30 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

coniferous forest
leaf area index
vapor pressure
canopy
vegetation
parameter
index

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

What is the best way to represent surface conductance for a range of vegetated sites? / Komatsu, Hikaru; Hotta, Norifumi; Kume, Tomonori.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 21, No. 9, 30.04.2007, p. 1142-1147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26c42b5a5e744198a20d54c3267b76a7,
title = "What is the best way to represent surface conductance for a range of vegetated sites?",
abstract = "Surface conductance Gs is a significant parameter for indicating the evaporative and photosynthetic properties of a vegetated surface. When comparing Gs values between different observation sites, some studies have used Gsmax and others have used Ĝsmax (where Gsmax is the maximum Gs value measured during the measurement period, and Ĝ smax is the maximum Gs value obtained with a vapour pressure deficit (VPD) of ≥1.0 kPa during the measurement period). In this study, we demonstrate a clear justification for using Ĝsmax instead of Ĝsmax when comparing Gs values between different sites. We examined whether both Ĝsmax and Gsmax lead to the same conclusions in classifying vegetated sites. Komatsu (2003b) [Hydrological Processes 17: 2503-2512] reported a clear relationship between canopy height h and Ĝsmax for coniferous forests with a projected leaf area index (LAI) of ≥3.0. We examined not only the relationship between h and Ĝsmax but also the relationship between h and Gsmax for coniferous forests with a projected LAI of ≥3.0. Both Ĝsmax and Gsmax decreased with increasing h. However, the relationship between h and Gsmax was less well defined than the relationship between h and Ĝ smax because of biased Gsmax data. Consequently, we conclude that Ĝsma'x is a more appropriate index than Gsmax to represent Gs for sites with different vegetation.",
author = "Hikaru Komatsu and Norifumi Hotta and Tomonori Kume",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.6674",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1142--1147",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the best way to represent surface conductance for a range of vegetated sites?

AU - Komatsu, Hikaru

AU - Hotta, Norifumi

AU - Kume, Tomonori

PY - 2007/4/30

Y1 - 2007/4/30

N2 - Surface conductance Gs is a significant parameter for indicating the evaporative and photosynthetic properties of a vegetated surface. When comparing Gs values between different observation sites, some studies have used Gsmax and others have used Ĝsmax (where Gsmax is the maximum Gs value measured during the measurement period, and Ĝ smax is the maximum Gs value obtained with a vapour pressure deficit (VPD) of ≥1.0 kPa during the measurement period). In this study, we demonstrate a clear justification for using Ĝsmax instead of Ĝsmax when comparing Gs values between different sites. We examined whether both Ĝsmax and Gsmax lead to the same conclusions in classifying vegetated sites. Komatsu (2003b) [Hydrological Processes 17: 2503-2512] reported a clear relationship between canopy height h and Ĝsmax for coniferous forests with a projected leaf area index (LAI) of ≥3.0. We examined not only the relationship between h and Ĝsmax but also the relationship between h and Gsmax for coniferous forests with a projected LAI of ≥3.0. Both Ĝsmax and Gsmax decreased with increasing h. However, the relationship between h and Gsmax was less well defined than the relationship between h and Ĝ smax because of biased Gsmax data. Consequently, we conclude that Ĝsma'x is a more appropriate index than Gsmax to represent Gs for sites with different vegetation.

AB - Surface conductance Gs is a significant parameter for indicating the evaporative and photosynthetic properties of a vegetated surface. When comparing Gs values between different observation sites, some studies have used Gsmax and others have used Ĝsmax (where Gsmax is the maximum Gs value measured during the measurement period, and Ĝ smax is the maximum Gs value obtained with a vapour pressure deficit (VPD) of ≥1.0 kPa during the measurement period). In this study, we demonstrate a clear justification for using Ĝsmax instead of Ĝsmax when comparing Gs values between different sites. We examined whether both Ĝsmax and Gsmax lead to the same conclusions in classifying vegetated sites. Komatsu (2003b) [Hydrological Processes 17: 2503-2512] reported a clear relationship between canopy height h and Ĝsmax for coniferous forests with a projected leaf area index (LAI) of ≥3.0. We examined not only the relationship between h and Ĝsmax but also the relationship between h and Gsmax for coniferous forests with a projected LAI of ≥3.0. Both Ĝsmax and Gsmax decreased with increasing h. However, the relationship between h and Gsmax was less well defined than the relationship between h and Ĝ smax because of biased Gsmax data. Consequently, we conclude that Ĝsma'x is a more appropriate index than Gsmax to represent Gs for sites with different vegetation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247491043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247491043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.6674

DO - 10.1002/hyp.6674

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34247491043

VL - 21

SP - 1142

EP - 1147

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 9

ER -