Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents?

Emi Ishita, Yasuko Hagiwara, Yukiko Watanabe, Yoichi Tomiura

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Our goal is to propose an alternative retrieval system of academic documents based on researcher's behavior in practice. In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted. Question items were developed from findings in the previous observational study for researcher's behavior. From the results of 46 respondents, the top three elements checked in the search results were title, abstract, and the full-text version. They also checked structure "Introduction" in the full-text rather than other structures when they found previous research in an unfamiliar field. These results indicate that researchers use different ways for selecting documents based on the type of documents they look for.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages345-346
Number of pages2
ISBN (Electronic)9781450351782
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 23 2018
Event18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2018 - Fort Worth, United States
Duration: Jun 3 2018Jun 7 2018

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
ISSN (Print)1552-5996

Other

Other18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2018
CountryUnited States
CityFort Worth
Period6/3/186/7/18

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Ishita, E., Hagiwara, Y., Watanabe, Y., & Tomiura, Y. (2018). Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents? In JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 345-346). (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3203867

Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents? / Ishita, Emi; Hagiwara, Yasuko; Watanabe, Yukiko; Tomiura, Yoichi.

JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018. p. 345-346 (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ishita, E, Hagiwara, Y, Watanabe, Y & Tomiura, Y 2018, Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents? in JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 345-346, 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2018, Fort Worth, United States, 6/3/18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3203867
Ishita E, Hagiwara Y, Watanabe Y, Tomiura Y. Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents? In JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2018. p. 345-346. (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries). https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3203867
Ishita, Emi ; Hagiwara, Yasuko ; Watanabe, Yukiko ; Tomiura, Yoichi. / Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents?. JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018. pp. 345-346 (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries).
@inproceedings{52699f6f9e6e4edb8406e3f6f0c3d000,
title = "Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents?",
abstract = "Our goal is to propose an alternative retrieval system of academic documents based on researcher's behavior in practice. In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted. Question items were developed from findings in the previous observational study for researcher's behavior. From the results of 46 respondents, the top three elements checked in the search results were title, abstract, and the full-text version. They also checked structure {"}Introduction{"} in the full-text rather than other structures when they found previous research in an unfamiliar field. These results indicate that researchers use different ways for selecting documents based on the type of documents they look for.",
author = "Emi Ishita and Yasuko Hagiwara and Yukiko Watanabe and Yoichi Tomiura",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1145/3197026.3203867",
language = "English",
series = "Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
pages = "345--346",
booktitle = "JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Which Parts of Search Results do Researchers Check when Selecting Academic Documents?

AU - Ishita, Emi

AU - Hagiwara, Yasuko

AU - Watanabe, Yukiko

AU - Tomiura, Yoichi

PY - 2018/5/23

Y1 - 2018/5/23

N2 - Our goal is to propose an alternative retrieval system of academic documents based on researcher's behavior in practice. In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted. Question items were developed from findings in the previous observational study for researcher's behavior. From the results of 46 respondents, the top three elements checked in the search results were title, abstract, and the full-text version. They also checked structure "Introduction" in the full-text rather than other structures when they found previous research in an unfamiliar field. These results indicate that researchers use different ways for selecting documents based on the type of documents they look for.

AB - Our goal is to propose an alternative retrieval system of academic documents based on researcher's behavior in practice. In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted. Question items were developed from findings in the previous observational study for researcher's behavior. From the results of 46 respondents, the top three elements checked in the search results were title, abstract, and the full-text version. They also checked structure "Introduction" in the full-text rather than other structures when they found previous research in an unfamiliar field. These results indicate that researchers use different ways for selecting documents based on the type of documents they look for.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048746201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048746201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3197026.3203867

DO - 10.1145/3197026.3203867

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85048746201

T3 - Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

SP - 345

EP - 346

BT - JCDL 2018 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -