Why do people stay in or leave Fukushima?

Shinya Horie, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

From the originally constructed survey data from 2011 Fukushima incident, this paper empirically assessed the sources of failures in disaster risk mitigation in short run. Although residential relocation from the cites at risk is one of the effective risk reduction measures, the relocation incurs mobility costs of developing social capital such as communities or searching public services such as education and medical institutions. The estimation results showed that the residents in the disaster cites of 2011 Fukushima incident can tolerate higher risks of radiation exposure when they have attachment to the original residence or higher demands for the public services, and can stay in the cites at risks consequently. Because the tolerance level can depend on the information associated with the risks, the results imply that the authorities’ providing the correct information is one of the keys for the disaster risk reduction in short run.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)840-857
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Regional Science
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

disaster
public service
relocation
move
incident
radiation exposure
social capital
mitigation
tolerance
education
resident
cost
costs
community
risk reduction
demand

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Why do people stay in or leave Fukushima? / Horie, Shinya; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 57, No. 5, 01.11.2017, p. 840-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Horie, Shinya ; Managi, Shunsuke. / Why do people stay in or leave Fukushima?. In: Journal of Regional Science. 2017 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 840-857.
@article{d09f42c46c914208822531e84ce9b2b9,
title = "Why do people stay in or leave Fukushima?",
abstract = "From the originally constructed survey data from 2011 Fukushima incident, this paper empirically assessed the sources of failures in disaster risk mitigation in short run. Although residential relocation from the cites at risk is one of the effective risk reduction measures, the relocation incurs mobility costs of developing social capital such as communities or searching public services such as education and medical institutions. The estimation results showed that the residents in the disaster cites of 2011 Fukushima incident can tolerate higher risks of radiation exposure when they have attachment to the original residence or higher demands for the public services, and can stay in the cites at risks consequently. Because the tolerance level can depend on the information associated with the risks, the results imply that the authorities’ providing the correct information is one of the keys for the disaster risk reduction in short run.",
author = "Shinya Horie and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jors.12341",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "840--857",
journal = "Journal of Regional Science",
issn = "0022-4146",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do people stay in or leave Fukushima?

AU - Horie, Shinya

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - From the originally constructed survey data from 2011 Fukushima incident, this paper empirically assessed the sources of failures in disaster risk mitigation in short run. Although residential relocation from the cites at risk is one of the effective risk reduction measures, the relocation incurs mobility costs of developing social capital such as communities or searching public services such as education and medical institutions. The estimation results showed that the residents in the disaster cites of 2011 Fukushima incident can tolerate higher risks of radiation exposure when they have attachment to the original residence or higher demands for the public services, and can stay in the cites at risks consequently. Because the tolerance level can depend on the information associated with the risks, the results imply that the authorities’ providing the correct information is one of the keys for the disaster risk reduction in short run.

AB - From the originally constructed survey data from 2011 Fukushima incident, this paper empirically assessed the sources of failures in disaster risk mitigation in short run. Although residential relocation from the cites at risk is one of the effective risk reduction measures, the relocation incurs mobility costs of developing social capital such as communities or searching public services such as education and medical institutions. The estimation results showed that the residents in the disaster cites of 2011 Fukushima incident can tolerate higher risks of radiation exposure when they have attachment to the original residence or higher demands for the public services, and can stay in the cites at risks consequently. Because the tolerance level can depend on the information associated with the risks, the results imply that the authorities’ providing the correct information is one of the keys for the disaster risk reduction in short run.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017364169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017364169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jors.12341

DO - 10.1111/jors.12341

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017364169

VL - 57

SP - 840

EP - 857

JO - Journal of Regional Science

JF - Journal of Regional Science

SN - 0022-4146

IS - 5

ER -